Neil Flambé and the Bard’s Banquet
The fifth installment in the Neil Flambé Capers written by Kevin Sylvester, Neil Flambé and the Bard’s Banquet is 310 pages long and was published by Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers, an imprint of Simon & Schuster Children’s Publishing Division. It was copyrighted in 2015 by Kevin Sylvester, and is the first edition. I decided to choose this book because I have read all the other books in the series, and also because I really like mysteries. Celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay has commented “Good fun” on this series.
The protagonist of the book is a talented but cocky teenage chef Neil Flambé, who has a super sensitive nose. Because of this, Neil has been dragged into a number of cases involving food, with most of them involving near-death experiences. He runs a restaurant, Chez
…show more content…
They find his clothes and some blood in the back of an old theatre. Thinking he is dead, they decide to pursue the jewel instead. Stumped by the clues, they ask Isabella’s friend Rose for help. They find themselves tangled with centuries old clues about the works of Shakespeare and food. Also looking for the jewel are the Crayfish brothers and Lord Lane, who staged his own murder to shake the Crayfish brothers off his tail. Neil and his friends think that they have found the jewel, which is a signature of William Shakespeare himself, but Rose is captured by Reggie and Ronnie Crayfish. They save Rose and head to Buckingham Palace to cook a meal for the Queen. Then, Neil realizes that the real jewel is in an old globe. Opening it, he discovers one of Shakespeare’s lost plays, one that Kemp must have stolen. My final thoughts for this book are that it was a really interesting book. What I liked most about it was that how the author kept making us think that something else was actually the solution to the case. I would recommend this book to anyone who likes
In my opinion I thought that this book was a very good book. In this chapter I will describe the setting, theme, plot and conflict etc. This book had a few different settings like
Throughout the chapter, Bourdain mentions listening to songs such as “House of the Rising Sun”, “Whiter Shade of Pale”, and “These Boots Were Made for Walking” and watching films such as Boeing Boeing (393, 397). He mentions these songs in order to set the time period in the 60s for the audience and connect them to the experience. He then tells the story of eating his first oyster, calling it “the proudest moment of my young life,” he claims (398). He discusses how his family seemed disgusted by the oyster, but he enjoyed it. Bourdain allows the reader to see this moment in his life in order to show the exact time that he truly realized that “food had power” (399). Bourdain’s use of his childhood memories connects the reader to the reason why and how he came to love food.
In my personal opinion, this book was very hard to read and follow. At certain times I had a hard time figuring out who was talking in the book. I really wanted to enjoy this book and it’s “case studies” but I simply could not get past the confusion and enjoy this like I would any other book. I feel like the author wrote a lot of the situations for shock
This book is a very good book. It is not one of my favorite books, but it is in, or somewhat close to, the top ten list. It has an intriguing story and has some humor in it to make sure that it isn’t all mellow.
11. Does the author offer solutions to the problems raised in the book? How probable is their success? Can you think of additional solutions?
Over all, I found this book to be very interesting. It brought up a lot of the ethical dilemmas we are going to have to deal with in our field of work. Anytime you work with people problems are bound to arise, like in the book when Ernest found himself sexually attracted to his client Carol, what is important is how you deal with them. While I enjoyed reading the book I felt like it abruptly ended in the middle of a lot of the ethical dilemmas. Personally it left me with a lot of unanswered questions such as what ever happened with all of Marshals ethical problems and his wife, and what ever happened with Dr. Seymour Trotter.
I wouldn’t recommend this book to the average reader. It is a bit hard to read because the author goes into so much depth that the reader could very often forget the main idea. It is a good, informative book but a bit drawn out.
A Midsummer Night’s Dream is one of Shakespeare’s most popular and frequently performed comical plays (Berardinelli). The play transformed into a cinematic production by Michael Hoffman has not changed in its basic plot and dialogue, but the setting and some character traits have. The play setting has been gracefully moved from 16th century Greece to 19th century Tuscany (Berardinelli). The addition of bicycles to the play affects the characters in that they no longer have to chase each other around the woods, but can take chase in a more efficient fashion. As far as characters are concerned, Demetrius is no longer the smug and somewhat rude character we find in act 1, scene 1
I did actually really like this book. I was not sure if I was going to enjoy it when the project was first assigned, but after reading for a while, I became really interested
While reading this book I found myself making notes on how I disagree with certain topics but I didn’t realize until I was about half way through that there were many good points made. Some of the good points I did notice can be found in every chapter
Where Shakespeare's tragedies will tell the story, chiefly, of a single principal character, this is rarely the case with his comedies. The comedies are more social and deal with groups of characters. In the case of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, the principal groups are, at first, introduced severally. Though, one group may interact with another (as when Puck anoints Lysander's eyes, or Titania is in love with Bottom) they retain separate identities.
The rise of tension between characters is another characteristic of comedic plays. After Oberon sees the way that Helena has been treated by Demetrius, he orders Puck to apply the juice to the eyes of Demetrius. Puck accidentally applies the juice to Lysander’s eye, which causes him to fall in love with Helena. After the mistake had been caught, Oberon sends Puck to watch Helena and Oberon applies the juice to Demetrius’ eyes. This causes both men to fall for Helena and now the battle is for Helena and not Hermia. Helena is convinced that this is a joke or prank because neither of the two men loved her before. Now because of Puck’s mistakes the four decide to find a
This story has a lot of issues that are going to be talked about in this paper such as the realism, the conflicts, the characters, Hintons style, the themes, etc. This book is pretty interesting and brings up a lot of good issues. There are a lot of reasons for reading this book, and also a lot to not read this book. Its just your own opinion, and there are a lot of opinions in this paper.
Overall the book was a good read and touched on some various topics that are discussed in our class.
If there was no such thing as sympathy, empathy, or love in our world, it would be a hard place to live. If there was no hard law or reason in our world, it would be a crazy place to live. Neither of these worlds would be anybody’s first choice as a home - it's just common sense take away either of these two fundamental aspects of life, and everything is immediately chaos. In fact, it is only in a world such as ours, where legal and human emotion work together, that we are happy. In William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream, Shakespeare recognizes this truth and uses the two settings to represent the city of Athens as law, order, civility, and judgment, while the woods represent chaos, incivility, dreams, and love.