Nepal's Present Is Reflexive of Its History

1725 Words7 Pages
Nepal’s present is reflective of its history. Within the past few years, the country has been in a state of disarray because its history has been fraught with political turmoil. As a whole, Nepal is a severely underdeveloped country. Throughout its history, Nepal has had little interaction with the outside world. The lack of political stability throughout its history accounts for many of the reasons of why Nepal is the way it is. As a landlocked country, Nepal has had little interaction with the outside world for most of its history. Unlike most developing countries, Nepal was never colonized. It is for the most part still considered a traditional society and has not experienced much modernization. Nepal’s history for the most part has been able to play out with little interference. While it is still underdeveloped, some theorists believe that the lack of outside interference will greatly benefit Nepal in the long term. While Nepal has recently experienced vast political changes, it used to be a monarchy. In 1846, the Ranas, the ruling dynasty, cut the country off from the outside world. In 1950, Anti-Rana forces allied with the monarch and the end of the Rana rule was brought about in 1951, allowing the sovereignty of the crown to be restored. Nepal joined the United Nations in 1955 looking to be connected to the outside world for the first time in almost a century. Nepal implemented a multi-party constitution in 1959. King Mahendra, who took control of the throne in

More about Nepal's Present Is Reflexive of Its History

Get Access