Nepotism in American Business and Politics Essay

When George Washington was elected President in 1789 by members of the fledgling United States of America, he was setting into motion a tradition that has stood the test of over 225 years - the presidential election. Even as the United States has seen dozens of wars, made hundreds of scientific advances, and selected thousands of politicians to seats everywhere from small town councils to Congress, the principles of the election have remained the same; the people band together to determine who will best protect their interests at home and assure that the US will always remain on top in foreign policy. Oftentimes, this is found to be a difficult decision, as public opinion is constantly wavering. One sees this in action particularly during the 1992 election - a battle of wills between Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ross Perot; complete with lead changes, major vote swings, and Perot’s unprecedented initial success - ultimately a false alarm to the bipartisan establishment.

Gibbs and Duffy highlighted key factors in succession. President after president realizes there is not a training seminar to be president, you can’t read a book on it. You just have to fall into it, you fall into the responsibilities, and the headaches, and the lack of privacy. But the president signs up for that, and they all soon realize that. The only person that can truly understand what a president goes through is in fact a president. We see presidents as almost godly people, they are the ruler of the free world, and they have say in issues that no one else has input on. It’s a crucial, stressful job that is only understood by someone who has gone through challenges relativity similar. The former presidents that Gibbs and Duffy wrote about has sincere feelings on empowerment towards each other, they truly didn’t want to see anybody fail. Which is weird, because as I was reading this book, I felt as if it was all about taunting each other. However as I got further its not about that at all, it’s a remarkable thing to almost

The myth of meritocracy has been proven true in multiply sources. Studies have hypothesized this before when relating to upward mobility. Upward mobility in the last forty years has been more and more unlikely for years and years now. Factors like race, socioeconomic status, household makeup, and economic conditions of this country play a big role. I will go more indepth about this study by showing more facts in the following paragraphs.

Compare and Contrast In the year 2000, the most controversial Presidential election occurred. The Presidential election consisted of Democrat, Al Gore, and Republican, George W. Bush. This election comes so close to a tie, only because the two elected representatives thought so much alike that their campaigns were nearly identical, with just a few differences here and there. In this comparison and contrast essay about the 2000 Presidential election, including Democratic representative, Al Gore, and Republican representative, George W. Bush, the author will discuss both the differences and the similarities of the representatives childhood, the offices they previously held, and their presidential campaign against each other.

The year 2000 held one of the most controversial elections of all time. Al Gore, Vice President for eight years, against George W. Bush, son of former President H. W. Bush. Both Gore and Bush sought to distance themselves from their normal parties, to make a unique approach to their political ideas. The 2000 United States presidential election was one of the closest presidential elections in history. A month of recounts and court challenges followed, culminating in the Supreme Court case Bush v. Gore. Following the court’s 5-4 decision, George W. Bush was declared the winner over Vice President Al Gore by 537 votes in the state of Florida. Domestic issues as opposed to foreign policy dominated the campaign. Key issues were prescription drug prices, campaign finance reform, Social Security, and education. Each candidate claimed their economic plan would reduce the deficit. Bush parodied himself as a “compassionate conservative.”

One topic that is expressly touched on in the second section of the article is the disenfranchising of the voters. There are a few state instances that are used as reference to show the discrimination that is being used against minorities about their voting rights. The presidential election of 2000, Al Gore V George W. Bush, is shown as an example for the potential disenfranchisement of voters. The article expands on the issue of the family ties that were present between Florida’s Governor, Jeb Bush, and one of the candidates. One company used by the state legislation provided the state with a large “scrub

As industrialization caused cites to grow in leaps and bounds, political bosses started to take power. As the 19th Century came to a close, almost every sizable city had a political boss, or at least had one rising to power. Tons of immigrants from every part of the world began to pour into the major cities. Cities have had diversity in the past, but the huge diversity of the American cities was unique.

Within this paper I will be discussing and giving a detailed description about “The Big Enchilada” and about George W. Bush’s 2000 election. The Big Enchilada is the story about the 2000 Bush campaign for the presidency that leads up to the election. With this story being a first person account of Stuart Stevens. Which seemed to be the media strategist for the Mitt Romney campaign if I understood correctly. He was also the media strategist for George W. Bush, who was the primary person responsible for the ad attacks against the other presidential runners in the 2000 campaign. Stevens was the key man responsible for the promotional material, convention planning, and debate prep who was responsible for some of the success of the

In the 2000 United State’s Presidential Elections, it was the incumbent Governor George W. Bush of Texas who represented the Republicans and incumbent Vice President Al Gore who depicted the Democrats. While the elections ended with a recount in Florida, Governor Bush was soon declared the president as he gained the majority of the electoral votes with 271. However, controversial uproar soon filled American voters when further polls proved Gore lost the elections while successfully winning the popular vote by more than 500,000 votes. Discouraged with the concept that a presidential candidate could win the popular vote but still lose the presidential elections, many American voters have turned their appeal to the National Popular Vote bill because

The controversy that arose with the presidential election between G.W. Bush and Al Gore is still being spoken of in recent times. The main question that everybody pondered from that December day in 2000 until now is ¨Who really won the 2000 presidential election?¨ Many argue that G.W. Bush won and that is that. While others argue that not all of Al Gore's votes were counted and so disabling the fact of his possible victory. Tensions grew

Presidential elections are almost always controversial, thus, the year 2000 proved that both parties would stop at nothing to win the spot of hierarchy. Through the disruption of votes during George W. Bush and al Gore’s election, there were many indicators that Al Gore, was in fact the real winner. The movie presented in class mentioned that, “The old people in Palm Beach Florida think they voted for Pat Buchanan.” This was the initiation of havoc within the presidential race, as it angered many and led to a recount. Furthermore, Buchanan mentioned that he believed they had mistaken his name for Al Gore, this shows that he was more liked and was more susceptible to winning the popular vote in the

The presidential election of 2000 stands at best as a paradox, at worst as a scandal, of American democracy. Democrat Albert Gore won the most votes, a half million more than his Republican opponent George W. Bush, but lost the presidency in the electoral college by a count of 271-267. Even this count was suspect, dependent on the tally in Florida, where many minority voters were denied the vote, ballots were confusing, and recounts were mishandled and manipulated. The choice of their leader came not from the citizens of the nation, but from lawyers battling for five weeks. The final decision was made not by 105 million voters, but by a 5-4 majority of the unelected U.S. Supreme Court, issuing a tainted and partisan verdict.

There is quite a bit of controversy involved in the presidential election of 2000. There is evidence to support that Al Gore would have in fact won the election, if it were fair to both parties. This is not to say that the outcome was necessarily to George W. Bush’s fault, but the final result was improperly and unjustly swayed in his direction. The nation was held in the balance for nearly an entire month to learn the outcome of the election and who would be the next president of the United States of America. George W. Bush, losing the popular vote, managed to win the electoral votes giving him the victory due to legal technicalities and improper equipment. The series of events ensuing the election quickly showed that there were

Politics is something that has been around since the start of times and usually is the talk of the town. During the 2000’s there were three presidential elections the first one took place in 2000. The Republican candidate was George W. Bush and the Democratic candidate was Al Gore. This race was extremely close. The final state, Florida, which was the deciding factor, was so close there was a recount. This became so big it went to the supreme court, Bush vs. Gore. But in the end George W. Bush won with only 5 more electoral votes than Al Gore. “This marked the fourth election in U.S. history in which the eventual winner failed to win at least a plurality of the popular vote (after the elections of 1824, 1876, and

President DJ Brackish stood behind his desk in the oval office staring out the window at the white house lawn. He was tired and felt old, but he refused to show it. His triumphs and personal sacrifices had become two mile-long lists that intertwined too often over his past term as president. He had done what no other president could accomplish before him. He stopped wars worldwide, ended terrorism, and helped to create an economic boom as great as the 1920’s except without the political corruption and the possibility of being long lasting. However, with his success as president came losses in his personal life. His wife had divorced him right after winning his second turn and he aged faster from the constant stress of running an entire country.