preview

Nestorius And Apollinarianism

Better Essays

During the 3d and 4th centuries controversy among the leaders and population due to the rising questioning of the humanity and divinity of Jesus Christ. At the beginning of the fourth century, the First Council of Nicaea was convened to come against the heretical teachings of Arius. Arius, a presbyter from Alexandria, who along with his followers believed that “before [the Son] was begotten or created or defined or established, he was not for he was not unbegotten and that the Son had a beginning but God has no beginning.” (Bingham, D. Jeffrey. Pocket History of the Church. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2002. Print.) Therefore according to Arius, Jesus Christ was not eternal nor divine but only possessed divine attributes. As time went on Arianism still was a problem in the church. …show more content…

At the Council of Constantinople, Apollinarianism, taught by Apollinaris the Younger, Bishop of Laodicea, which stated that while Christ, the Logos, had been made flesh then He had to have both a sensitive soul and a rational soul as well as free will. According to Apollinarianism, where there is free will, there is the presence of sin. This coincided with the Council of Chalcedon with contended against the heresy of Nestorius and Nestorianism, which “sacrificed the unity of Christ’s person for the fullness of deity and humanity.” (Bingham, D. Jeffrey. Pocket History of the Church. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2002. Print.). as well as Eutychianism, which supported the idea that Jesus Christ was of one nature only and. This heresy was also known as monophysitism, which held that Jesus Christ had only one nature, a mixture of both divine and human

Get Access