Net Neutrality : Pros And Disadvantages And Cons Of The Internet

What is net neutrality you may ask? Well net neutrality or open internet is legal content and/or applications that internet service providers give you on an equal basis. They cannot have any favorite websites and block others.In my opinion in favor net neutrality. It makes sure every web site is treated equally. This goes for all video,audio,etc. in my future I want to be a entrepreneur and net neutrality helps people get access to broadband networks without any problems! Big companies like Apple, Microsoft, google (and more) also go for net neutrality. As well as those companies there are some that are against net neutrality. Companies such as AT&T, comcast, cox, and verizon are against net neutrality. They said “The rules are too heavy-handed and could stifle investment and innovation.” Again in my opinion i think net neutrality is a great thing because i think everyone should be treated equally and should have the same chance and votes should have a fair play and have no cheating. Of course pirating is extremely illegal and should be corrected, many web sites are being copyrighted and stealing people's identities and these innosite people are getting banked ruped and losing there jobs for using these websites. Net neutrality is basically the human rights but on computers people need and deserve them.For the people that are against net neutrality, a new FCC chairman, ajit pai,worked as a lawyer for verizon and plans to get rid of net neutrality which would be a big win for

Having an open internet help people to communicate and express their stories to others. Being African American is sometimes a struggle, especially when mainstream media stereotype us as one and fail to let African Americans to speak for themselves. So, having Net Neutrality let us have a voice when it comes to racial and social justice. In addition to, small business rely on Net Neutrality to help them launch and market their business ideas. This help the small business lower the roadblock and give them a opportunity and a fair chance to go up against other big companies that are highly known. Thirdly, there is no censorship on what and much you or anyone else upload or download.

Without net neutrality, companies can charge the customer for how much data they use rather than a flat price. Most every other business practice is like this. If someone goes to get fast food and only wants a sandwich but has no other choice but to get the full meal, that is the same concept. This is very appealing to lots of people who may not use as much data as most internet users and feel that they are paying too much. Internet Service Providers are very against net neutrality because it costs them more money.

Why fix a system that isn't broken? We always have been free to browse anything on the internet(no extra packages to pay to view extra things), so why it change now? It only will benefit large companies and the majority of people are middle class, so there'll be a major difference of opinions. Ultimately, more than half of the nation would like to keep net neutrality in play.

In my opinion net neutrality is “Dumb” because it’s the internet providers just want to suck up our money and revoke our internet freedom. I am super against net neutrality because it’s useless it doesn’t even help anything its basically paying overpriced taxes on something we don’t really need or use all the time. Zacks.com says that these web sites may cos 25$ to use: Amazon.inc Netflix.inc Facebook.inc Alphabet.inc and Twitter.inc

To be completely honest, I have never heard Net-Neutrality before this discussion post. After doing some research on this topic, I’ve come to the conclusion that I am against Net-Neutrality.

As previously stated, net neutrality is a complex subject and it has many layers. One issue of major of concern is that of “fast lanes” and the establishment of net neutrality would prevent ISPs from forming these types of connections. Simplified, a fast lane is line of service that provides faster upload and download speeds. A fast lane would allow ISPs to charge companies such as Netflix, Skype, PlayStation Plus, and other streaming services for faster connections that would allow consumers to access the services easier and faster. Proponents of net neutrality worry that the extra expenses for fast lanes could become a formidable challenge for startups and small business owners. Large corporations typically

Since net neutrality forces Internet Service Providers to treat all content equally, people can have equal opportunity on the internet. Blocking, throttling, and slowing websites is restricted with net neutrality, so everybody gets to have equal competition on the internet. Without net neutrality Internet Service Providers would have the ability to throttle companies that support them, and block competitor companies and their services. This would start monopolies that restrict smaller companies from selling products and services. People also have suspicions that Internet Service Providers will start to make people pay microtransactions to have access to each individual site or group of sites on the internet. Because net neutrality evens the playing field for all users of the internet, net neutrality promotes

One of the greatest things about the internet is the ability to visit any website you please to get your news and information. The removal of net neutrality would allow ISPs to slow down or even block you from accessing certain websites unless you pay a premium. This is a basic violation of a our fundamental rights under of the 1st Amendment: freedom of speech and

Net Neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular services or websites. If we were to lose Net Neutrality, then we will inevitably lose all innovation, creativity, and the spread of great ideas on the internet, allowing only the wealthy and powerful to have complete access to the internet. Without net neutrality, we would see a decrease in innovation, the gap of accessibility of information between the rich and poor would increase, we would start to see a rise in censorship in content, which violates free thinking and freedom of speech. The fight against net neutrality is also a very modern one, and is still being fought today, and many advocates for net neutrality will continue to fight until the internet is safely open and free to everyone.

I also think that the government needs to maintain net neutrality, because there have been cases throughout the last few years of ISPs and phone providers illegally blocking websites from all their customers - e.g. AT&T blocking Verizon’s website in an attempt to lower competition. This is not good, because the consumer has a right to know about their ISP’s competition if they want to know it, and blocking it prevents them from making an educated decision if they want to switch. If net neutrality is done away with, and there aren’t proper laws in place, ISPs would also be able to charge different amounts to different companies for the same amount of traffic - meaning that if Verizon had to pay AT&T to unblock their site, AT&T might decide to charge Verizon far more than is reasonable. This also means that ISPs could charge more from larger companies, and make more money than they already do, or charge more from small businesses that they don’t like and drive them bankrupt or cut down their profits due to online traffic being blocked, and the business wouldn’t be able to sustain itself from the lack of

If somehow we abolish net neutrality, we would come into a situation that so-called "law of the stronger" would be adopted. Large corporations will have primacy in the market, while smaller corporations will struggle to survive. And if we abolish net neutrality, I personally think that we will find the way to bypass the new rule. For example with illegal downloading, a lot of people have decided on this way, although they know it is a criminal act, because they are not in the financial situation to buy a service through the

“Net neutrality shackles the internet with rules and regulations designed for the bygone era of the black rotary phone rules that made sense in 1934 but not today”. This is a quote from Brian Paul who is a reporter from “The Mercury News” which is based in San Jose, California. Net Neutrality is the idea that all internet service providers should treat all lawful internet content equally and it is restricting the dynamic and ever-changing landscape of modern computing. Although, on the other side of the argument many people like Tim Berners-Lee who is known to be the creator of the world wide web say “Neutral networks are critical to ensuring fair, open competition in the content market and driving America's growth in the digital era”. It is

Net Neutrality also allows information and ideas to be spread to people. In the article Net Neutrality: Why Artists and Activists Can’t Afford to Lose It by W. Kamau Bell it states “When the activists Alicia Garza, Opal Tometi and Patrisse Cullors started using the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter to discuss the killing of the unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin, it began trending worldwide, eventually anchoring the modern movement against police brutality against African-Americans” This is talking about the spread of ideas on the internet. Without open internet causes like #blacklivesmatter would not have been able to spread. There are many causes that began on the

In this field, competition refers to network owners (ISP). Their differential in pricing and control of information alters the competition. Anti-competitive acts by network owners would be barred due to the impact of net neutrality (St. Petersburg). The major companies (telecom and cable) could enforce a fee for faster Internet or prefer content that is associated with their partnered conglomerates. The cause would be a halt in innovation and end up giving larger companies the power to nudge aside the smaller start-ups from expanding (Linux Journal). Also, net neutrality saves the internet as an ideal marketplace. For the previous 10 years, the Internet has been a public marketplace where privatized companies are able to expand and grow, and this reputation will continue to serve (Opposing Views). More importantly, without net neutrality in affect, price discrimination risks start-ups from emerging out of their cocoons. Net neutrality once paved the concept of free market endeavors. Without these regulations, innovators are at the hands of network owners and building new online entrepreneurships or