Net Neutrality Regulations Research Paper

The biggest concern is that the internet will become pay-to-play technology with two tiers: one that has speedy service and one that doesn’t. The high-speed lane would be occupied by big internet and media companies, and affluent households. For everyone else there would be the slow lane.

But what exactly is Net neutrality? Net neutrality means cable companies such as Time Warner Cable and Verizon cannot charge more for faster internet speeds. Which means everybody who uses the internet will have the same speed. Hence the word neutrality. Verizon communication sued the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) saying that they do not have jurisdiction over that subject and limiting speeds is a violation of the First Amendment. "The FCC says Net neutrality rules are designed to preserve the internet as an open platform enabling consumer Choice, freedom of expression, and end-user control, competition, and the freedom to innovate without permission." This case went to the US court of appeals for the DC circuit. The courts ruled in favor of a Verizon. The reasoning for the decision is that “FCC has no authority to apply common-carrier obligation like non-discrimination and no-blocking rules to broadband providers.” I agree with this decision. The reason is that the internet should not be like electricity. If you plug your phone into the wall to charge. It's going to have the same amount of current as someone else charging their phone. But what happens if I want to charge my phone faster? I can’t because electricity is neutral. But when I go on the internet and I see it is slow. What happens if I want to make it faster? With Net neutrality I could not make it faster. I want the option to make my internet faster. And what happens to large corporations where internet speed is essential to stay in business? The fact of the matter is that the FCC does not have jurisdiction over this matter. Net neutrality should never be passed. It will only hurt the consumer. In addition, the FCC approved of a $9.25 monthly charge to help low-income families connect to the internet. Three out of the five Commissioners voted for the subsidy plan. This approval is one part of the reform of the fund

The faster Internet speed one desires, the more costly it will be. Meaning that big or small companies have to pay the same flat rate for the same Internet speed. By having the same flat rate for all companies, it makes start-up firms easier to get into the market. If net neutrality were not in place, as written in the article, “Goodbye Net Neutrality…Now What?” by Michael Kassner, who attended the University of Wisconsin, stated, “Getting rid of net neutrality will allow ISPs [Internet service providers] like AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon to supply, for a price, preferential treatment to content providers.” Meaning that the ISPs will charge companies for their websites, services online, etc. to be faster. This could be a positive or negative thing for companies. If the company is a large one and can afford to pay for preferred treatment, not having net neutrality could be a good thing, as we can see from AT&T Sponsored Data service. As explained in the article by Michael Kassner the Sponsored Data service is,” Sponsoring companies agree to pay AT&T so its subscribers need not worry about monthly data limits — a digital version of the razor/razor blade theory. Content providers willing to do this are giving their users more or less a free data pass, so consumers will consider this a plus.” But there are downsides; AT&T or other ISPs can

With the internet growing larger and larger each day, it has been a place where communication and the transfer of information happens within seconds. The internet is a place where the freedom of speech is shown and show the creativity of people. Net neutrality has caught the interest in many people in the United States. With this hot topic debate, President Barack Obama 's position on the subject is wanting a “free and open” internet for fair access to any website (Net Neutrality: A Free and Open Internet, 2015). In the United States, we should maintain a state of net neutrality because it provides an equal opportunity for companies to compete, prevents restrictions on websites, and showcases our fundamental rights to the world.

preserves the free speech of the Internet. This will allow the ISP’s to compete without

Net neutrality is when companies charge you to pay to go on sites like google.Net Neutrality is simply the principle that Internet providers must treat all web traffic equally. It's the only thing stopping companies like Comcast & Verizon from controlling what we can see and say online It is really hard to live without internet.People should not have to pay for internet or anything it is really bad for people to pay for internet that means more people in the streets homeless people and more you have to pay taxes to feed people on the streets that take the economy .down.So that mean less money for the people and that is really bad it takes away from talking to people online and having conversations online.The FCC is really bad and just wants

Net neutrality is internet service providers like Xfinity, AT&T, and Fios that enable access to all contents and applications, for example Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat etc. regardless to the source, without favoring or blocking products and or websites.

The concept of network neutrality (more commonly referred to as net neutrality) has been a fixture of debates over United States telecommunications policy throughout the first decade of the twenty-first century. Based upon the principle that internet access should not be altered or restricted by the Internet Service Provider (ISP) one chooses to use, it has come to represent the hopes of those who believe that the internet still has the potential to radically transform the way in which we interact with both people and information, in the face of the commercial interests of ISPs, who argue that in order to sustain a competitive marketplace for internet provision, they must be allowed to differentiate their services. Whilst this debate has

Net neutrality is the basis in which all internet providers must treat data on the Internet equally and not charge differently based on what device , website, application you use, or content you decide to view. The recent vote in the U.S. to repeal net neutrality’s guidelines is unjust because it violates 1st amendment guidelines, gives the people less freedom, and gives Internet service providers many ways to meddle with data speeds and how their users use the Internet.

Net Neutrality says, “Okay so you have already paid x amount of dollars. Have a nice day! Enjoy your internet!”

How many people have a smartphone? How many people use any source of social media? (snapchat, instagram, facebook...ect) Would you still use these medias if you had to pay for them? How much would you be willing to spend on these? Social media is something more than 75% of americans use everyday.

Net neutrality is the standard that internet service providers should provide all access to all content regardless of the source, and with no bias or opinion with products or the websites. Many consider this the proper way to create articles, whether news or not, considering that people deem only fact to be necessary. However, considering that facts usually stem from a similar source, this would eliminate all originality. Thus meaning, net neutrality will inhibit opinion in articles.

People are more dependent on the internet then they ever were (Conda 2). Internet service provides may start having exclusive deals for certain service like Netflix or YouTube. Internet companies are making the Internet very unfair, and since certain areas only have one or two internet providers they can control whatever they want without people leaving (Gattuso 3). Another reason for not enforcing net neutrality regulation is it would take away all the filters that the broadband providers gave to the families; these filters block “child pornography, obscenity, and other dangerous content on the Web” (Conda 3). Another company came in to play in the net neutrality fight, Google Fiber. Google Fiber supposed to be really fast internet and to compete with the other companies and the FCC (Gattuso

In this field, competition refers to network owners (ISP). Their differential in pricing and control of information alters the competition. Anti-competitive acts by network owners would be barred due to the impact of net neutrality (St. Petersburg). The major companies (telecom and cable) could enforce a fee for faster Internet or prefer content that is associated with their partnered conglomerates. The cause would be a halt in innovation and end up giving larger companies the power to nudge aside the smaller start-ups from expanding (Linux Journal). Also, net neutrality saves the internet as an ideal marketplace. For the previous 10 years, the Internet has been a public marketplace where privatized companies are able to expand and grow, and this reputation will continue to serve (Opposing Views). More importantly, without net neutrality in affect, price discrimination risks start-ups from emerging out of their cocoons. Net neutrality once paved the concept of free market endeavors. Without these regulations, innovators are at the hands of network owners and building new online entrepreneurships or

Around the world, several CEO’s of major tech industries are supporting the idea of keeping the internet free and provide access to information without any barriers. Recently, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg hosted a Q n A in which he mentioned his full support to Net Neutrality. His idea of providing the internet to the world using his initiative internet.org will help several under developed and developing parts of the world to get access to basic internet services and the content it provides. According to him the content should not be discriminated or limited by internet service providers like AT&T and Verizon. In countries where there’s no internet at all, it would be better to have some internet services so that there’s an establishment of connectivity rather than no internet. This is the reason the initiative of internet.org is important and can co-exist with net neutrality. He also believes that net