This article was downloaded by: [UNISA University South Africa] On: 13 February 2012, At: 22:32 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ctas20
Building Innovation Networks: Issues of Strategy and Expertise
Lisa Harris, Anne-Marie Coles & Keith Dickson Available online: 25 Aug 2010
To cite this article: Lisa Harris, Anne-Marie Coles & Keith Dickson (2000): Building Innovation Networks: Issues of Strategy and Expertise, Technology Analysis &
…show more content…
It is argued that the explicit nature of this network strategy has enabled the rm concerned to invest time and resources in the development of speci c management expertise in inter- rm relationship building and project management.
Lisa Harris, Anne-Marie Coles and Keith Dickson, School of Business and Management, Brunel University, Uxbridge Middx, UB8 3PH, UK. This paper has been based on work carried out under the European Community Targeted Social Economic Research (TSER) programme, Project No. PL97–1084. The authors would also like to thank the case study rm for its participation in the project.
ISSN 0953-732 5 print; 1465-3990 online/00/020229-1 3
© 2000 Taylor & Francis Ltd
230
L. Harris et al.
Technology Strategies for New Product Development Rationalist approaches to technology strategy, such as that of Porter,1 view technological innovation as a relatively unproblematic aspect of corporate strategy. This article will attempt to show that the development of new products by a rm is a more complex, dynamic and uncertain activity than this, dependent for success on organizational as well as technological factors. It will be argued that strategies for technological innovation are, by implication, risk management systems. Here we are referring to the introduction of some means of control over the cost and direction of new technologies,
This course for juniors and seniors explores firm strategies related to innovation and technological change. We focus on how the success of technological innovations—new products, processes, and services—depends on the firm’s business model. Other key topics include intellectual property rights and the management of technological uncertainty through organizational arrangements such as corporate venturing, spinoffs, and alliances.
Many of the new forms developed are a direct relationship between self-organization and network. The inner workings of the organization help to develop a massive network. Thus, increasing the number of quality relationships with other business, organization, or school districts. The development of networks is invaluable to any organization. Business managers, principals, superintendents, and etc. use their networks to ensure that the organization, or school they are crafting is one that will represent success.
Technology management (TM) for companies is about sustaining and improving a company’s competitiveness in the long-term; being able to think out-side-the-box of what will be the new best thing before its competitor. There are three main aspects that fall underneath the umbrella of TM, leadership, motivation of employees, and last appropriate management technology. A company’s goal of what they have in mind for TM is to create a synergy among all factors (i.e. research, development, planning, engineering, machines, software, productions, and communications) to make them countersink together
Because the external environment of any company is ever-changing, opportunities must be sought and taken to succeed and continue to compete in the marketplace. Such opportunities can be derived from a variety of reasons (such as new regulatory restrictions or internal mandates), so taking the time to properly identify prospective opportunities for product development is absolutely crucial for an advantage over existing and potential competitors (Crawford, Di Benedetto, 2015). While many companies' products are in a position where they could likely continue to thrive as they are, seeking and taking new opportunities to sustain product growth could pay off in the long run.
In response to this problem, the purpose of this paper is to increase awareness of the possibilities of investments in research devolvement, along with success stories of companies who have seen success in taking on new technology, along with that discussing strategies that can help the business succeed before adapting technology and after adapting new
And fourth, cross-boundary efforts are notoriously underfunded, normally through pilots or projects requiring competition and bidding. When negotiation and bargaining is cofounding with partners from different levels, managers must adapt to the circumstances and objectives of each member in order to catalyze a common goal and strengthen the membership. These forces motivate managers to be creative in the process of collaborative management through the creation of coalitions, exchange of information and negotiation’s strategies. Network management skills evolves for the need of public acceptance and legitimacy, that managers must transmeate to partners, to external stakeholders, in industry and business, to scientific community, to public agencies (p. 195). When the networking skills evolves, changes are evident due to the increase of accountability among partners and the legitimacy of the network is not in question. Overall, the discussion should be on valuing the old-fashion management skills rather than getting rid of them, but to build from them skills management adaptable to the new governance by network
As we can see, both alternatives imply as well opportunities and risks. If I were the decision maker in this case I would surely choose the alternative to implement the new technology that will allow the company to create innovative products.
These technologies grow and develop within the company over time, and are utilized in successive products. The collective body of the company's technology experience broadens with the emergence of every new product. This broadened experience has turned out to be the base for appraising the "incremental newness" of the technology personified in the subsequent new product.
Develops and maintains ‘relationship capital’: This is something of an unknown term in the world of public sector and projects that fall under it. The successful design and completion of a project is supposed to depend upon three critical ingredients, namely physical, human and fiscal capital. But there is little or no mention of relational capital, which is a term that revolves around relation building. The importance of this unique ingredient can be gauged by realizing the fact that there are competing interests at stake whenever there is a project. Different parties come with different objectives and everybody wants to have their share of the pie. Often times, it happens that these differing opinions lead to conflict of interest and become
2) Chesbrough, H., W., (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 44 (3): 35–41.
A 2011 article from MIT Technology Review, "Four Principles for Crafting Your Innovation Strategy” (by Paul B. Carroll and Chunka Mui),
The Australian Innovation system report for 2013 states that an innovation system is ‘an open network of organisations both interacting with each other and
They can investigate the option of improving their current products to be able to compete with the new technology in some way and to invest in product innovation to see if there are possibilities of improving or matching this new technology. This should be done cost effectively to also be able to offer products at an
Another major challenges of any technological industry is R&D and capital expenditures, the R&D and capital expenditures cost is more than innovative output (Fritsch and Franke, 2004). For this organizations have been progressively prompted perform cooperative R&D to establish technological collaboration. For industries to sustain in market they often requires knowledge beyond organizations boundaries in order to overcome the existing technological base and dynamics, which requires innovation to create innovative technologies to compete against other industries to sustain in the market, industries think “two heads are better than one”, Some tasks may be accomplished more easily by two entities working together than by one working alone. So industries are collaborating to develop variety of products, which leads to the business success. The speed of change, particularly as businesses look to move into new areas in tough times, mean that the industries must invest more in creative-focused R&D, and look to exploit existing strengths through new business.
It’s important for an innovation system that knowledge can diffuse from one company to another, especially in a heterogeneous context. It can be measured by number of workshops, conferences and mapping size of the network.