preview

Never Let Me Go

Better Essays

A brief examination of Never Let Me Go will reveal that Myra Seaman is correct in their argument. Seaman uses the following quote from the novel. When Tommy and Kathy are confronting Madame about the deferral process, Madame asks, “How can you know it? You think love is so simple?” (pg. 253). Ironically this shows that Madame is acting more inhuman than the clones are, because she is losing the fact that love is simple. Tommy and Kathy are clearly in a loving relationship and this shows that they are human. On the contrary, Madame is displaying an inability to understand someone and is acting inhuman. The way she asks if “love is so simple” proves her inhuman and that Seaman argues that love is what defines us as human. Another time we see …show more content…

In Eatough’s essay, they explain the concept of bildungsromans, the genre of literature that is a “growing up” story. They further expand this to explain that in recent stories, bildungsroman has come not only to mean growing up and finding your place in your community, but also finding your vocation. With Never Let Me Go and other posthuman/biopower contemporary works, Eatough says that, “that, in effect, the time of Bildung will be subordinated and completely determined by the body's physical existence.” (pg. 144). In essence they are saying that one's purpose is carried through their vocation and community even going past them being alive. In the case of Never Let Me Go, the clones showcase this through their end purpose being to donate their organs. After this, Eatough analyzes Kathy’s vocation specifically and her mentality towards it. Eatough writes, “Kathy’s vocation transfers effective care from her own body and channels it into attentive care for the well-being of other bodies;” (pg. 149). What Eatough is saying here is that Kathy and other proficient carers are able to care for their donors because they no longer care for their own self. This is the ultimate form of bildungsroman because it goes past the self and brings Kathy to only care for her community and …show more content…

This article truly shows the darker side of humanity. When introducing us to Ishiguro and the novel, Jennings writes, “He [Ishiguro] knows that when meanings disappear from our languages of self-understanding and social construction, then our capacity to think, to act, and even to feel in ways linked to those meanings disappears as well.” (pg. 19). This explanation is important to understanding why we push the other way. By speaking specifically to words and social construction, Jennings shows us that we can dehumanize a people by simply labeling them something else and removing any complexity to them. We see this time and time again in all of humanity’s history, with slave and Jew being the two most prominent. Jennings also introduces the idea that the clones have come to accept the situation they are in. Jennings explains, “Ishiguro explores ambivalence, defensive denial, and the complex process of identity formation. Kathy H. and her peers only gradually perceive that they are not a fortunate few, but members of what is, in reality, a stigmatized and oppressed group” (pg. 18). Kathy, Ruth, and Tommy do realize what they are and what will happen, but they eventually just accept this. This is again similar to other stigmatized groups who instead of seeking a violent and glorious revolution, simply keep

Get Access