preview

Never Let Me Go And Ally Condie's Matched: A Comparative Analysis

Decent Essays

Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go and Ally Condie’s Matched may follow similar conventions to create a dystopian society however, the purpose each author conveys is significantly different. Ishiguro uses Tommy G. to illustrate to readers that one’s future is decided by fate, in contrast, Condie uses Cassia Reyes to depict to readers that one should take hold of their future and create their own destiny.

In both novels, Tommy and Cassia are dystopian protagonists who question their surroundings, are curious, and raise concerns not many around them are too worried with. Although both characters doubt their social and political systems, Tommy does not put his thoughts into motion while Cassia does. Unlike his peers, Tommy comes up with conspiracies …show more content…

Both Tommy and Cassia are aware of the issues between the civilians and their society however, Tommy does not do anything to resolve this conflict. Cassia on the other hand makes conscience decisions in order to challenge the Officials and Society. In both texts, the societies Tommy and Cassia live in attempt to control everything they know, do, and eat, which limits the freedom the residents have. In turn this causes certain individuals – like Tommy and Cassia – to question authority and seek out any possibility of escaping. In Never Let Me Go, Tommy strives to avoid his inevitable, interminable, insufferable death by hoping the “deferral” is real. By distracting himself with the possibility of prolonging death, Tommy truly believes that he is working towards a brighter future for himself. Likewise, in Matched, the Society uses the Matching Ceremony and poetic words as a means of distracting their citizens from the true injustice they face: the fact that everything is controlled by them. However, the alikeness between the conflicts in Never Let Me Go and Matched end there because when the characters realize the truth about these diversions – that the deferral is just a rumor, and the ceremony a distraction – the differences become pronounced. When Tommy is told that the talk about deferrals is just childish gossip, he does …show more content…

This is depicted through how Tommy and Cassia manage certain objects that symbolize freedom and choice. In Matched, all citizens are given three tablets which they can eat depending on the circumstance: blue to save a life, green to remain calm, and red to forget. This represents the small freedom and choice the Society lets the citizens make and although they would prefer their citizens take the pills, they do not force it. In a similar fashion, driving in Never Let Me Go symbolizes the freedom of doing and going anywhere one desires. For instance, Kathy says, “I do like the feeling of getting into my little car, knowing for the next couple of hours I'll have only the roads, the big grey sky and my daydreams for company” (Ishiguro, 159). Like Kathy, Tommy can also get in a car at will and drive to wherever he pleases; he can take advantage of this freedom, but never does. That is the key differentiating factor between Cassia and Tommy, Cassia does take advantage of this small choice she gets to

Get Access