Neverfail Computing

After reviewing the Financial Report from The Leslie Fay Companies from 1987 to 1991, I made ratios of Balance Sheet and Income Statement to start with audit planning, which could help us make comparison directly. Also, the calculation of ratios in liquidity, activity, profitability and solvency contains in my report. The purpose of analytical procedures is to detect “red flags” within the financial and non-financial information. For the financial part, firstly, I made year-to-year comparisons from 1987 to 1991; then, I did going concern analysis that to compare the data from The Laslie Fay Co. with the industry standard

Based upon my knowledge learned on financial reporting, I had compared to companies reporting statistics. The two companies in comparison are PepsiCo Incorperated and The Coca-Cola Company in which both have reported annual statistics for 2004 and 2005. During my comparison of net incomes, gross expenses, stock statistics, and assets accumulations, I have suggested some strategies for each business to take into consideration for better future results. As an accountant in training, I will be giving specific details of my analysis and recommendations, as these are my opinions for financial success.

The liquidity, profitability, and solvency ratios reveal some interesting points about Kudler Fine Food’s financial position. The liquidity ratios revealed that during 2002 and 2003, Kudler was having no trouble paying short-term debt. However, the current and acid-test (quick) ratios showed that during 2003 Kudler had an excess amount of cash that they were not investing properly. These ratios also showed that Kudler was collecting receivables and selling average inventory very quickly. The profitability ratios revealed that during 2002 and 2003, Kudler was using assets efficiently and making a decent profit. The profit margin ratio showed that during 2002 Kudler made a profit of four cents per dollar, and during 2003 they made a profit of roughly six cents per dollar. In addition, the return on assets ratio (which is also a profitability ratio) showed that Kudler utilized their assets efficiently enough to turn a profit. The solvency ratio used, which was the debt to total assets ratio, showed that during 2002 and 2003 Kudler only had around a quarter of their assets financed in debt. All of these ratios show that Kudler was a fairly strong company financially during 2002 and 2003. When trying to figure out how successful Kudler Fine Foods is, it is critical to review all financial statements. By using the horizontal and vertical analysis and the determining ratio calculations the profitability, liquidity, and solvency are figured. A specific

The company’s cash has been decreasing over the 2 years however its current and quick ratio has gone up, from 2.26 to 2.53 and 1.06 to 1.26 respectively, due to its increase in accounts receivable and inventory, the company may need to minimize amount of sales based on credit or require however down payment on its installment sales. Haefren must also be offering more lenient credit terms to its customers since its average collection period has also gone up significantly, this could be correlated to the lax credit terms Wiegandt currently offers Haefren. Haefren’s return on equity is also declining, using the DuPont method, as a result of our low net profit margin and our decreasing asset turnover (as a result of lower sales and higher assets). The company currently finances itself with bank loans which have decreased while cash is decreasing, the increase in debt may be growing to an unsustainable rate as our debt to equity ratio has almost doubled from 5.84 to 9.37 between 1993 and 1994. This poses a major a problem for the corporation as cash and sales are decreasing and loans are increasing, the company may need to liquidate the warehouses. The warehouses could be a major factor in another problem: low profitability. Low operating profit margins of 1.6% suggests high operating expenses. The company may need to cut operating expenses by reducing by

Exhibit 4 gives a good analysis of how these policies have affected the business’ performance and situation. Although sales growth has been consistently large, operating profit margin has decreased overall since his strategies were implemented. Return on equity and net assets have increased and in the year 2000 were 10.3% and 8.4% respectively. This is a good result for the business and shows efficient management of assets.

The financial aspects of a business can make or break a company. In the case of Haefren Baum, the company does not seem to be excelling financial. The company is funding itself through long-term debt and the deferment of payable and expense accounts. Funding from the bank can be seen as the liability account Notes Payable (Bank) increases. The company may be forced to fund itself through the bank because of liquidity issues and the fact that its payments from customers are taking a long period of time, as seen in the average collection period. Factors that may be

In conclusion, financial statements of Dollar General present the increase in company’s profitability and sales over the last two years, they reduced their expenses as well. The only information that the statements do not disclose is which brands of merchandise increased their sales, and what was the cost of goods sold compared to the profit they made. Since the company was concerned about promotion of their private brand it would be helpful to know what percent of sales does their private brand make comparison to other brands. Nevertheless, the long-term liquidity risk does not look as safe. The company will have to show the stability in its ratios overtime to insure investors that it has low risk and is able to repay its debt in a long run as well as maintain stable

- They did not manage their money properly. Without a specific funding plan, they quickly burn out the money they raised even before they fulfilled the need of $1.5 million.

In conclusion, we can state that Ford’s ratios shows a lot about the situation of the company. It’s clear, that also its book value equity and the net income were negative in the last years, it can realize a less than 3000 million $ net income only in 2009. In addition, its sales fall short of the previous ones, the operating revenue decreases continually. Besides, the total debt of the company is also very high, over the past 4 years it remained over 100 billion $ all the time, but it lessens yearly, as the interests too. The amount of Ford’s total

The liquidity, profitability, and solvency ratios reveal some interesting points about Kudler Fine Food’s financial position. The liquidity ratios revealed that during 2002 and 2003, Kudler was having no trouble paying short-term debt. However, the current and acid-test (quick) ratios showed that during 2003 Kudler had an excess amount of cash that they were not investing properly. These ratios also showed that Kudler was collecting receivables and selling average inventory very quickly. The profitability ratios revealed that during 2002 and 2003, Kudler was using assets efficiently and making a decent profit. The profit margin ratio

The company’s debt ratios are 54.5% in 1988, 58.69% in 1989, 62.7% in 1990, and 67.37% in 1991. What this means is that the company is increasing its financial risk by taking on more leverage. The company has been taking an extensive amount of purchasing over the past couple of years, which could be the reason as to why net income has not grown much beyond several thousands of dollars. One could argue that the company is trying to expand its inventory to help accumulate future sales. But another problem is that the company’s

Also, according to its leverage ratios, the company’s debts are not only very high, but are also increasing. Its decreasing TIE ratio indicates that its capability to pay interests is decreasing. The company’s efficiency ratios indicate that despite the fact that its fixed assets are increasingly being utilized to generate sales during the years 1990-1991 as indicated by its increasing fixed asset turnover ratio, the decreasing total assets turnover indicate that overall the company’s total assets are not efficiently being put to use. Thus, as a whole its asset management is becoming less efficient. Last but not the least, based on its profitability ratios, the company’s ability to make profit is decreasing.

On the other hand, Mega Corporation’s financials are going downhill. Despite having a strong balance sheet, there was a benefit pension plan that was hugely under-funded. The income statement was worse. Sales were nearly cut in half, due largely to the fact that foreign competition was squeezing out the margins. Profits and cash flow dropped even more than sales.

If we evaluate the performance of Gulf's management for the period from 1976 to 1983, we will find out that the management basically did not run the company properly. Many indicators prove the fact the management's efforts in spending huge amount of money in exploration and development activities did not yield their benefits. The analysis will cover numerous set of financial indicators in order to present the full picture of Gulf's management's performance.

It’s noticeable how the company’s operations have been deteriorating as they are having a more difficult time translating sales into cash. Their A/R turnover is not where it needs to be, and in line with that, their liabilities are increasing as well. The company has also been inefficient with the use of their assets as their current activity ratios are not up to par with the industry standards.