New London Case

Amongst topics of conversation regarding eminent domain, one will find regulatory usage of land, seizing of land for public use, and the most controversial of late, the seizing of land from a private owner and giving it to a more economically beneficial, often politically connected private owner. Kelo v New London (US 2005), has prompted dozens of proposals to reform eminent domain practices legislatively. Most of these proposals would restrict the use of eminent domain to transfer property from one private individual to another. It is one thing to have a city claim property to further the development of the city by building roads, schools, etc. It is another thing altogether for the government to seize a property so as to gain money from higher taxation. For many years, however, courts have read the public-use restraint broadly, enabling governments to take property from one owner, often small and powerless, and transfer it to another, often large and politically connected, all in the name of economic development, urban renewal, or job creation.

The purpose of ID NYC was to provide a legal government issued identification for every New Yorker that includes benefits. Anyone can receive this municipal ID by only providing a New York City residents address. It does not require any other forms of identification or proof of citizenship. Thus it was highly praised by everyone who supports equality among documented and undocumented NYC residents when it was initially introduced. It was implemented to serve the New Yorkers regardless of their immigration status in the United States. But while creating this course of action, policymakers in the City of New York should have reflected on the consequences ID NYC can bring for some citizens who will acquire it. At the time this policy was created, the ramification of it was not taken into consideration. In this proposed policy reform proposal a specific reform will be discussed to make the ID NYC better for everyone and for the future generation.

Imagine that someone knocks on your door one day and says, “We’re taking your house away for governmental use.” This idea is known as eminent domain and it is a very controversial dispute in our society. Eminent domain is the governments right to seize someone’s land and home for other purposes that can ultimately benefit the whole community. Even though eminent domain is technically protected by our 5th Amendment, it is meant to be used properly and only in extreme conditions.

Defendants were in a "state of nature" so Newgarth's standard laws did not apply to them; the laws of nature would allow them to agree to sacrifice one's life to save the other four

I have the opportunity to purchase a small mixed use property at 664 North Wells Street, (the property includes 664, 666, 668, and 678 North Wells) in the heart of the River North District. After doing some online research, I have found a brokerage firm (Chicago Brokers) that has several listings for properties in the area. I prefer use this brokerage firm because I am in the market to purchase the property, becoming the property owner. In choosing this brokerage firm, I am aware and understand that the commission will be paid by the current owner and split between the brokerage firm representing me, and the brokerage firm representing

The occurring disappearances pile up in Bath, London. Recently, Billy Weaver, a young seventeen year old, disappeared after visiting Bath for a potential job interview. This case is remarkably similar to two cases two years ago, when Christopher Mulloand and Gregory W. Temple went missing. All three men were close in age. Surprisingly, they were all last seen in a boarding house. Her neighbors described the landlady as slightly dotty. Last night, authorities were able to arrest her after she was on the run from the police. The landlady, who allegedly killed the three men, was identified as Mrs. Susan Taylor, a forty-five year old woman. She confessed to killing the three young men with cyanide poisoning. Forensic investigators found fingerprints

Patrol was increased in the vicinity of the area of the crime, and the vicinity of all three pawnshops.

My original insight on this article is that New England’s second largest city was not doing the right research that they needed to come up with a good strategic plan for the community. I believe that the city was more concerned on making a profit when I think they should have been more concerned with the locals needs and wants. In recent years, many malls have been struggling to keep their doors open and have even reconstructed them into a different kind of mall by offering fitness centers and even adding grocery stores to replace the failing department stores. At first, I thought that the city should be considered adding some new features to the malls rather than demolishing these malls all together and replacing them with new buildings. I

After Berman vs. Parker, the definition expanded, and after Kelo vs. New London in 2007, the lines were blurred even further proclaiming that government can take away private property and then sell it to private developers. Some say it shouldn’t benefit private developers because it can easily be abused, but others say if the project produces tax revenue and jobs, economic development can be considered legitimate “public use” (Berkey-Gerard, 2014, p. 80). Ultimately, thanks to the Kelo decision, the idea of using eminent domain to increase jobs in the look of stadiums, corporate headquarters, office buildings, museums, and shopping malls are made

In the case of Bickham v Washington Bank & Trust Company, a distinction must be made as to what type of contract has been made if any. In a unilateral contract is also called a “Promise for an Act” (Cheeseman, 2013). The meaning of this is that an act must be completed in order for there to be a contract. An example of this is if someone was to promise to pay a set amount if a second party painted a wall. If the wall is not painted then the contract does not happen. A bilateral contract is a contract in which two parties agree to a “promise for a promise” (Cheeseman, 2013). In this case there is a bilateral contract created. The agent of the bank Mr. Adams created an agreement in which Mr. Bickham would move all finance business to

Kelly interprets the rationale behind public use requirement and eminent domain while arriving at two conclusions.The article distinguishes between the government and private individuals on terms that while the former has to go through eminent domain to acquire previously private property in order to maintain transparency , the latter can resort to secret buying through some undisclosed agents.The second difference lies in involvement of corruption albeit not in orthodox eminent domain rules but on the side of the private owners in order to influence the taking process. A close to home example would be Indian landowners who were threatened by the Colonial rules of eminent domain and who established relationships with the latter so that no harm would be inflicted.Later, rapid economic development and urbanisation increased the exercise of eminent domain by the Indian government. Article 19 and Article 31 of the constitution recognised the above mentioned characteristics and granted it as a right.It is currently controlled by The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act,

From a professional perspective, I believe in Hitham as one of the most ambitious employee I have worked with. I have known him for about seven years as he has working under my command in Arab Contractors Medical Center and since his first day I saw him a well-disciplined, industrious employee with a pleasant personality, and definitely catching this scholarship will broaden his knowledge and enriching his experience. Beyond that, his forthcoming studies in Sweden will also bodes well for his long-term career, ensuring that he can expect to climb higher and faster. Furthermore, his history of having been graduated from a recognized university will make him enjoy unique opportunities and the mark of academic excellence makes him a highly sought-after

The New London Development Corporation (NLDC) was authorized to cease the property of those refusing to sell their land. These homeowners, consequently, suffered from verbal & physical harassment from the City, thereby making is easier for the Institute of Justice (IJ) to present a case, arguing that the urban renewal project displayed elements of “eminent domain abuse” by forcibly evicting people from their homes. It was argued that “if it is not necessary to take particular property under the guise of accomplishing a public purpose, the taking in any sense cannot be for a public use.” Further, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor emphasized that are only three possible variations of takings that comply with public use requirements; (i) A transfer of private property to the public. (ii) A transfer of private property to common carriers, such as railroads & public utilities. (iii) A transfer of private property to private parties, but only in certain circumstances (Rutkow, 2006). Justice O’Connor, along with Justice Clarence Thomas, disagreed with the standpoint of Justice Anthony Kennedy

Mercury is an appropriate target for AGI. AGI is looking to increase its revenue and profit by utilizing synergies. The initial aim of AGI for acquiring Mercury Athletics is to increase leverage with contract manufacturers and to boost the cooperation with the retailers and distributors. AGI was one of the most profitable and successful companies in the market segment, but the firm’s size remained rather small in comparison with the main competitors. Therefore, with the acquisition of Mercury, AGI planned to build competitive advantage. Besides, the target company had well developed operation infrastructure, impressive labor facilities in China and numerous

1902: Dayton Dry Goods Company was founded in 1902 by George Draper Dayton, a banker who built his wealth by buying farm mortgages in southwest Minnesota and an active member of the Westminster Presbyterian