New Zealand And The Constitution Essay

The Constitution had changes the United States greatly. The document, written in 1788, was a powerful representation of the government back then, and amazingly, it’s still in play today. During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government and the constitution. The two parties were the Federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was best for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness in the national economy. Also, the Federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt

Between 1787 and 1791 the Framers of the US Constitution established a system of government upon principles that had been discussed and partially implemented in many countries over the course of several centuries, but never before in such a pure and complete design, which we call a constitutional republic. Since then, the design has often been imitated, but important principles have often been ignored in those imitations, with the result that their governments fall short of being true republics or truly constitutional. The Framers of the Constitution tried very hard to design a system that would not allow any one person or group within the government to gain too much power. Personally, I think they

There are ten documents in “The Making of Constitution”, each document demonstrates the process of forming a constitution. For instance, these documents illustrate the disagreement between the servitude and abolition of slavery, the religious freedom, and the forming a new constitution. In document one, an African American names Cato appeals his emotion toward the bring back of servitude, after he and his family had tasted the sweets of liberty. He claimed that the state of bringing back the slavery is the cruelest act that a man can make, thus he suggests that hanging them would have been more merciful.

issues of all kind. The country I was born in did not guarantee freedom of

| In Massachusetts Bay, men who owned property could go to a town meeting and vote.

Our founding were brilliant men who built a great nation and framed a document that is heralded as the greatest written defenses of liberty in human history. Their work laid the foundation for what our country is today and provided us the many liberties we have enjoyed. However, as our nation grows and changes there have been several serious and divisive issues that have arisen that affect our way of life. These issues have grown to great significance and threaten to undo all their authors have accomplished. Several notable complications with our current constitution are issues with the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of Government. In response, the class of BCPP-101 has been tasked with the writing of a new constitution to address the inadequacies and issues that we have perceived with our current Constitution. After careful deliberation and much debate, we have crafted a new document we believe stands superior to our current Constitution. In it we have attempted to mend the issues found in our current laws and build a stronger constitution more applicable to our present times. We dealt with issues of all branches of government, and rights and liberties in a final document that I am proud to have been a part of crafting.

Professor Larry Sabato is the founder of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia presents 23 proposals to revitalize our Constitution and Make America a Fairer Country. His book provides insight for a hard fought debate. Whether you like his suggestions or not or you agree with him or not, you have to respect anyone that can outwardly state that the United States Constitution as it has been handed down is “outdated.” This quest for reform I’m sure would anger many political conservatives who believe that the Constitution that we know today, is not in need of any reform, and is just the true document that is has always been and should remain.

Traditional Originalism led the court as the method of constitutional interpretation until the late nineteenth century. Judges were compelled to interpret the Constitution based on the original meaning of the provisions. The Originalism view interprets the constitution line by line exactly as the founders would have found it. Later, during the early twentieth century, progressives in the legal community proclaimed that due to the changing social environment as time goes on in the nation, the political system needed to be reconfigured. They thought that the political system needed increased national government authority and a modern administrative state. They also thought that the increased national authority and modern administrative state wouldn’t work well with the traditional Originalism interpretation of the constitution. After long political battles in and out of the court, they won the argument and the Constitution would be adapted without formally amending it. Debates were waged over whether or not the Constitution could be changed through interpretation instead of the originalist requirement of amendment, and over whether or not the Constitution was to be viewed as living. The notion of a “living constitution” was developed, and slowly set precedent as landmark cases made their way through the supreme court, and the interpretation of the constitution was put to the test.

Question - Do political parties in New Zealand follow this Ideology? Choose three specific policy

According to the Nez Zealand government, a company will only be considered as a company in New Zealand after it has been registered with the company’s office which administers the register of companies In New Zealand.

New Zealand’s government is a parliamentary democracy. Similar to Great Britain, there is no written constitution. In 1993, the legislature was expanded to 120 members. These members serve terms of three years, and are elected by a mixed system which is based on proportional representation, not universal suffrage. The Queen of New Zealand is the British monarch, and the

To begin, New Zealand's holds a “parliamentary democracy under a constitutional monarchy” (CIA). This means, the 120 members of parliament make the law's (house of representatives), the executive panel, administers the laws, and the judicial branch clarifies the law. This system is very similar to the Britain's government. Their “president” or better known as sovereign is Queen Elizabeth the II. She is the representative for their government (New Zealand Parliment). The government is broken up into two tiers; central and local. The central government makes the overall decisions that influence New

Abolishing the Monarchy in New Zealand would inherently call into question the issue of constitutional reform. New Zealand would need to consider having a written constitution. In this essay the focus will be on ‘Independence and a Written Constitution’ in relation to steps that may need to occur for New Zealand to become a Republic. I will reflect on the use of the word ‘may’ briefly as there are merits in remaining with an “unwritten Constitution” mainly in relation to the fluidity that has historically led New Zealand’s gradual progression to Independence.

Social class, is a highly controversial topic and is one of the most debated topics amongst sociologists, with many different theorists claiming it entails different things. There has been much debate between sociologists whether or not New Zealand is a classless society, and I am here today to argue against this view, stating my reasons as to why New Zealand is not a classless society and in fact never has been. I will argue this by looking at the social stratification of New Zealand throughout time, dating back to Traditional Maori in the early nineteenth century, through to the contemporary society we see today.

The increase in globalization has enabled a plethora of means in which organizations can access more talent and new technology that have become available. Due to this phenomenon, businesses have required to become more creative and embrace change as an essential method of staying competitive in their marketplace. The increase in ethnic group migration to New Zealand and the concept of managing this diverse range of culture and interacting with individuals with different cultures, belief systems is a current issue that impacts contemporary organisations in New Zealand. According to Sayers (2012), countries throughout history have different yet related ways to deal with inequality and discrimination issues that occur through diverse people existing in close proximity. From social movements focusing on womens rights, civil rights, anti-slavery and indigenous rights, to modern diversity such as disability activism and managing diversity in the workplace, it is apparent that this issue of managing diversity is an ongoing encounter.