Newborn Screening Research Paper

3. Even though screening tests exist, most people aren’t checked for the disease. Why not?

Soon after the child is born, several drops of blood samples would be collected. Additionally, parents’ or legal guardians’ written consent is necessary prior to screening. The consent would include detailed information regarding the testing program, sample storing process, retention, and future research use. According to the bill, legal guardians and parents of a child, or after 18 years, the newborn child would have a chance to request the department not to use the samples for research purposes and/or destroy the samples. The bill would help to determine phenylketonuria, the hereditary and congenital diseases, including, but not limited to, Biotinidase deficiency and cystic fibrosis (AB-170, 2015). The early prevention process would help to determine the causes of intellectual disabilities or physical defects. Furthermore, the process

With this in mind, many people who suffer with PKU use many low protein, dairy free, fruits and vegetables products to maintain their health and even stated that “PKU isn't just a diet thing. It's a brain thing.” Since all 50 states and territories of the United States require the screening of PKU, it is normally tested right after the baby is born. By taking a few drops of blood from the heel of the baby, the sample will be sent to a laboratory to test the amount of phenylalanine in the sample. Since PKU is also known as a genetic disorder, many health care providers also suggested the idea of genetic testing so it can into detail about the mutations in the genes that will cause

Soon after birth, all babies born in the United States will check for a specific disease. This is called newborn screening. All infants look healthy because they can see from just a baby emergency and screening. Finding these conditions soon after birth can prevent severe problems such as brain damage, organ damage and even death. For example, if the baby's body is capable of handling phenylalanine, make a test (PKU) for phenylketonuria. Phenylalanine is a result of brain damage found in some of the many protein-rich foods and sweeteners can be built on the blood and tissues of a baby with PKU. PKU and baby are put in a special case to avoid the diet initially. Babies are tested for hypothyroidism means that the body does not make enough thyroid hormone. Hypothyroidism baby can take hormonal drugs to prevent a slowdown in growth and brain damage that can occur if not treated hypothyroidism. Also, baby with sickle cell disease are at

Testing allows parents to prepare and eliminates surprises, parents especially of the communities prone to the sandhoff disease should get tested to see if they are a carrier to this disease. Sandhoff should become a required prenatal test to ensure no child must go through the pain and symptoms and not be fully supported and prepared. The sandhoff disease has many destructive aspects that make these two test essential to any parent concerned. Wouldn't you like to have time to support and prepare your

In most cases, cases of G6PD deficiency go undiagnosed until a child develops symptoms. If the symptoms occur the individual should talk to a doctor about performing a screening with blood tests to check for G6PD deficiency. If doctors suspect G6PD deficiency, blood tests usually are done to confirm the diagnosis and to rule out other possible causes of the anaemia.

Newborn screenings are done to identify infants with PKU. Each state in the United States differs with their screening process, but most of the screenings consists of blood tests. A few drops of blood are collected from the baby’s heel 24 hours after the baby is born. The blood sample is sent to the laboratory to test for metabolic disorders such as PKU. If there is an indication of PKU further tests are conducted like urine tests and more blood tests.

Twila Brase, a public health nurse and president of the citizens’ council on Health Care who is aware of new born screening as the largest single application of genetic testing in medicine as a challenge that might result into an explosion of the return of Eugenics, issue of the privacy and sometimes involuntary genetic research. She addresses herself to physicians, medical researchers, and the interested patients in the article: “Newborn Genetics Screening Runs the Risk Violating Rights”, warning them that genetic testing might cause future disasters as the government with the help of researchers, they might eliminate, the people who do not meet their (eugenicists) point of view of being healthy. She critically discusses how the government,

Newborn genome screening is an issue that will becoming increasingly important in the coming decades. It has the potential to bring about many early diagnoses which could have a large impact on healthcare. This will only occur though if states can uniformly adopt a standard set of tests to be screened for. Equally important is the subject of uniformed consent. When we apply these variables to the 6 steps process we can fully compare the benefits and risks. This gives insight into taking the most appropriate actions in the future.

New born screenings have been implemented since the 1960s. More 44 states advocate for 21 of 29 screenings and yearly newborns go through screenings for genetic defects. The intention of new born screenings is to identify genetic conditions before traits occur for early treatment. For instance, PKU screenings pinpoint infants therefore a calculation of diet is given to prevent mental retardation. Unfortunately, not all conditions are treated the same with the use of dietary measures, it even goes as far as medical procedures. Diagnosed defects include developmental delays, neurological defects and increase in morality. Even more some are left without treatment being of its rare condition and become therefore become a patient in waiting. In

prior to the predicative or prenatal testing. The direct gene test is useful for the

condition. However, as a good health-care consumer I should have information about that particular test and its alternatives.

Since the recommendation for Newborn Screening for CCHD Screening, several states have implemented it, and various studies have been conducted to verify its outcome. According to a study done by Good et al. (2015), 13.3 per 100,000 live births have undetected CCHD. The studies that were done by Garg et al. (2013) and Good et al. (2015) prove that CCHD screening utilizing pulse oximetry is effective in improving early detection of newborns with

They argue that it would take years to find significant evidence supporting that it would be beneficial. Numbers speak volumes in the medical field. It’s understandable that statistics might help conform that of the oppositional stand point. Newborn Screenings again contain 29 core tests, but when we put into NUMBER form those specific diseases included in standard regulated tests show we are only talking about “1/3 of one percent of those screened actually are diagnosed.” (Baby Center,

In 1993, the average age for identification of a hearing impairment in the United States was approximately 3 years old (NIH, 1993). Consequently, the first three years of a child’s life are most important for speech and language development, and therefore, crucial years for detecting hearing impairments. Without the ability to hear, children will not develop speech or language skills. Therefore, a lack of efficacy in previous protocols fueled the innovation of “universal newborn screening.”