One calm summer night in 1877, several Nez Perce braves, angered by the terms of a treaty that sent them to a reservation, snuck up on a village with the intent of getting revenge. By morning, the braves and their tribe had fled the scene, leaving the dead villagers in their wake. Because of this incident and several other factors, the US was justified in their actions leading up to and during the Nez Perce war. They were trying to contain murderers, take back the land legally owned by the US, and continue the spirit of westward expansion known as Manifest Destiny.
The first reason the US was justified was that they were only trying to contain murderers. According to an article put out by the Idaho government, “ … two young Nez Perce warriors
…show more content…
According to History.net, “One shot from a settler’s rifle helped shatter a fragile peace” Settlers had been killing the Nez Perce for as long as they had been in contact. But, the Nez Perce had been killing settlers that had moved in on the land that the US had given them, and the Settlers were only defending themselves and their families from the violence. This is why the US was justified in their actions.
The second reason the US was justified in their actions during the Nez Perce war because when they asked the Nez perce to move, they were living on land that was legally the USA’s. In the treaty that the Nez Perce signed, it says “The said Nez Percé tribe of Indians hereby [give] to the United States all their right, title, and interest in and to the country occupied or claimed by them” The Nez Perce had signed the treaty and were illegally living on the land, so that is why the US was justified in its actions.
Granted, not all of the head chiefs signed the treaty. According to IndianEd.org, “The [Tribes] outside the reservation did not sign [The Treaty]” The Head Chiefs of the tribes that had borders outside the reservation did not sign the tribe because they did not want to give up their land, but, because the tribes identified as Nez Perce, they were still bound under the terms of the agreement. This is why the US was justified in its
Taking into account the challenges they would have to face, they pleaded to let them stay in their homeland but the response was yet another that resulted in force when General Howard arrested Chief Toohoolhoolzote. The chiefs not wanting to wage war decided to leave their homeland but an event occurred where a few young Nez Perce warriors killed four settlers made matters worse (Edmunds). Consequently, this led to an attack that took place at White Bird Canyon dated June 17, 1877 (West). The repercussions of the conflict prompted a fifteen hundred mile journey for the Nez Perce. According to Evans, during that odyssey some 250 Nez Perce defeated the about 2000 U.S. army soldiers in a series of 18 embarrassing battles and skirmishes. The Nez Perce reaching the Bear Paw Mountains were only thirty to forty miles shy from Canada stopped for rest, thinking that the U.S. army was far behind but general Howard had notified Colonel Miles, who with his six hundred men rushed to intercept them (Calloway). During the battles of the fifteen hundred odyssey most of the chiefs died and in the battle of Big Hole somehow Chief White Bird along with three hundred men escaped and reach Canada while Chief Joseph after five days surrendered. The Nez Perce that surrendered were promised by Colonel Miles to be able to return to their homeland if they surrendered. According to Calloway the promise was a betrayal but arguably according to Edmunds
The natives didn’t get there rights they were promised,they were promised land yet they lost much,they were promised peace yet many died of war,the U.S. was unfair and unjust toward the nez perce and had forced them into signing the treatie and did not stand by it. Although the U.S, may say that they followed all the Natives rights and that they may not understand the treaties but still the natives rights weren’t followed as stated in the treatie.
With the settlement of the American West, I discern that it was not nice to force Native Americans off their land onto reservations. There was a treaty given to the Sioux for the rights to the Black Hills until gold was discovered in the area. The white miners flocked to the territory to get the gold. I don’t think it was right that with the treaty the U.S. government still ordered the Native Americans back to their reservations. With the conflict that occurred between the U.S. Government and the Native American Indian in Battle of the Little Bighorn, also called Custer’s Last Stand, marked a significant victory for the Native Americans and unfavorable for U.S. Army’s defeat. The Native Americans would have to remain in government-controlled reservations.
There was a raid, Pony Express versus the Paiute Clan. It started in the1860’s, traders from the Pony Express kidnapped and raped two Paiute girls. When that happened tribal members responded with absolute force to get the two girls. Therefore, the tribal members killed five whites in the process of rescuing the two girls. So, when the Americans heard what happened the Americans went
All was well, Mexico, US, until, something went wrong. In 1821 Mexico declared independence from Spain. Texans won the battle of The Alamo in 1836 and Then the Mexican war started in 1846. The Americans were either justified or unjustified in their decision in going to war with Mexico. The Americans were unjustified in going to war with Mexico over Texas because they settled in their land without asking the Mexicans if they could.
As the Americans crossed the Sabine River with their slaves they started a war that would affect two countries forever.In years before Americans showed how land-hungry they were when they had welcomed land from the Oregon territory in 1846.Did America have good reasoning in going to war with Mexico?No,but it was not always the Americans fault.Mexico did shed American blood on American soil and attack groups of American soldier.Americans were unjustified in going to war with Mexico because they stole land,disobeyed laws,and ignored Mexican authority.
Once the first blood stain hit the ground, the U.S. knew they needed to retaliate back with Mexico. All of this commotion between the Americans and the Mexicans was caused because both countries wanted Texas. At the time Texas was its own private country and it was being fought for between America and Mexico. From 1846-1848 the Mexicans attacked the Americans which caused the Battle of Alamo. Today, the Alamo is a very popular site in Texas that many people visit each year.
Indigenous leaders such as Tecumseh, were being supplied and encouraged by the British. Americans on the western frontier were outraged by this and demanded that interference be stopped. It wasn’t. A powerful motivation for the Americans was the desire to hold up National honor.
Nez Perce War - A band of Nez Perce Indians, led by a man called Chief Joseph by the white settlers, had some of their reservation taken away after gold was discovered on it. After a few young men in his tribe murdered four white settlers, a worried Chief Joseph took a group of more than 800 other Indians away from their reservation. The war officially started at the Battle of White Bird Canyon, on June 17, 1877. A series of battles then ensued, with most surprisingly ending with the victory of Chief Joseph, who many eventually considered a tactical
In the mid-1800s, settlers started moving in to the eastern part of the country, in hope of fulfilling a dream shared among settlers called the “Manifest Destiny”. With intentions of only peace, the miners created a treaty that allowed the miners to mine on the land that the Indians were living on. It put the Native Americans on an Indian reserve, that the Miners were only allowed on if given permission by the Indians. Like every deal, this treaty had strings attached. They were to move out in 30 days, and after that, anything left on the land would become the miner’s property. The Nez Perce War had started because of Chief Joseph's refusal to sign the treaty. Soon after Chief Joseph’s refusal to sign the treaty, the settlers made it clear that
The U.S war with Mexico was justifiable for many reasons. The war all began with the United States annexing Texas, causing problems with Mexico. Then ended with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Although the United States war against Mexico may be viewed as controversial, the war was just due to: Mexico not communicating, Mexico harming Americans, and unfair laws towards Americans. First of all, the war was certainly honorable, after Mexico refused to communicate with the United States causing more problems.
At Wood’s request, 40 Nez Perce rode from Wallowa to Lapwai for a council, which was held from July 22-23, 1876. Wood told the Nez Perce that Howard had proposed that the U.S. Government appoint a commission to settle once and for all the ownership of the Wallowa country, and he asked the two Indians to let white law deal with Findley and McNall. Both Joseph and Ollokot, Joseph’s brother, agreed to this, and the Nez Perce returned home. Afterward, Howard wrote to Brainard to insist that the two men be tried for murder.
The Nez Perce War was an armed conflict between several bands of the Nez Perce tribe of Native Americans and their allies, a small band of the Palouse tribe led by Red Echo (Hahtalekin) and Bald Head (Husishusis Kute), against the United States Army. The conflict, fought between June–October 1877, stemmed from the refusal of several bands of the Nez Perce, dubbed "non-treaty Indians", to give up their ancestral lands in the Pacific Northwest and move to an Indian reservation in Idaho. This forced removal was in violation of the 1855 Treaty of Walla Walla, which granted the tribe 7.5 million acres in their ancestral lands and the right to hunt and fish in lands ceded to the government.
The Indians did nothing wrong, they can’t be the villains. In “Chief Joseph Speaks…,” Joesph states, “On account of the treaty made by the other bands of the Nez Perce the white man claimed my lands. We were troubled with the white men crowding over the line. Some of them were good men, and we lived on peaceful terms with them, but
They did not heed the call, so the Americans attacked. The attacking battalion was easily defeated by the Natives, and no soldier remained alive. Unfortunately, when reinforcements arrived they forced the Indians to surrender. Even though the Natives were eventually subdued, the intruders suffered a major loss. “Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse, leaders of the Sioux on the Great Plains, strongly resisted the mid-19th-century efforts of the U.S. government to confine their people to reservations” (“Battle of the Little Bighorn” 1).