Ted Talk Response Paper Niall Ferguson begins his “Ted Talk” by discussing the “billions” of the future and the past. He mentions that 106 billion people have lived on this planet and that most of them are no longer living. Most of those 106 billion people live and have lived in Asia and are on average, very poor. Today, there is 195,000 billion dollars of wealth in the world and most of it was made after the year 1800. He goes on to say that the West is 19% of the world’s population today and that Westerners own 2/3 of the world’s wealth. This is what is referred to as “The Great Divergence.” The “Great Divergence” is two ratios of per capita GPD. There is an exponential “Great Divergence” that Ferguson illustrated with a graph that had …show more content…
This included major breakthroughs against infectious diseases, as well as surgery and sewage treatment. Life expectancy began to rise and was doubled and then more than doubled. Number five is a consumer society. A consumer society is needed in order for economic growth in a country. A country needs people to want to buy tons and tons of clothes. One example of the opposite of a consumer society is when Gandhi made poverty permanent and people did not buy a lot of clothes. This resulted in no economic growth. Japan was the first non-Western society to embrace the consumer society. Lastly, number six is work ethic. America used to have a strong work ethic because it had institutions that created incentives to work. The west has since lost its great work ethic and now, the average Korean works a thousand hours more than the average German each year. Ferguson states, “The Great Divergence is over.” The iPhone was designed in California, but Japan, Korea, and China actually built it. Because of this, they are leading in the realm of technological innovations. It is possible for any country to accumulate a good work ethic among their …show more content…
The decline of Western civilization is not inevitable but it could collapse very suddenly because it operates on the edge of chaos. America has a ton of debt and has lost most of its strong work ethic, so the great divergence has been closed. Ferguson says that geography is not responsible for prosperity. He explains that laws and rules that are based on reason are the real reason that prosperity occurs. There were two natural experiences in the 20th century. got all the Germans and divided them in two. Gave the East part of Germany and gave them communism and they produced one of the world’s worst ever car, the Trabants, and the West (did not have Communism) produced the Mercedes Benz. This resulted in a divergence not resulted from geography or culture. It is the ideas and the
The text my partner and I were originally going to analyze was Robb Willer’s Ted Talk called How to have better political conversations. We decided not do analyze his speech however we did take inspiration from it. The text we analyzed in the end were article titles posted on The Washington Post written by a variety of people.
While the author consistently states that the super-elites have harvest the fruits of globalization at the expenses of those who are unable to take advantages in a tidal wave of digital revolution, she gave fragmented examples to support her reasoning. Most of Freeland’s evidences are limited within the North American context, and thus insufficient to explain the other comparable super-elite phenomena that took place in Western Europe and Southeast Asia. Likewise, the author constantly brings up the 1% and 99% metaphor without fully discloses just how do we identify the two different group of people. The only example that she introduced is that the combine wealth between Bill Gates and Warren Buffett is more than the total of the rest of 120 million people
Civilization: The West and the Rest, presented by Niall Ferguson, is a documentary in which Ferguson reveals what he calls the six killer applications which has helped Western civilization dominate over everyone else. These six applications are competition, science, property, medicine, consumerism, and work. Ferguson asks many questions over the course of the series as well as provides examples as to how Western civilization has surpassed other nations and empires. Ferguson’s main question in each episode is, “If we lose our monopoly over apps like these, could Western civilization be consigned to history.” This paper will analyze Ferguson’s questions and the examples he provides for the killer applications of competition, science, property, medicine, consumerism, and work, as well as his conclusions as to why the West has risen to the top, how the rest are passing up the West, as well as his conclusions to if the West can remain above the rest.
First, Mr. Stark is a Social Science Professor at Baylor University, who is well versed to tell the story of Western Civilization. Mr. Rodney Stark the Author of How The West Won, is committed to truth, with a willingness to go out on a limb for truthful historical data that may be “barbaric” to today’s society, but in fact, he wrote about a part of the true history. His story telling from a historical point of view is fantastically told. Some of the many things he writes about: the western civilization did shape the rest of the world, uniquely, through the early times of Mesopotamia, through Greek culture, Roman Empire and on to modern eras. Additionally, how the ancient Greek culture survived
In “Why I keep speaking up, even when people mock my accent,” Safwat Saleem, shows his passion and his courageous side when speaking in his Ted Talk, describing the main idea of there not being such a thing of normalcy, as well as arguing that individuals should be confident and accept who they are from their special qualities. Agreeing with Saleem (2016), however to also consider it has become common in today’s society to want to be normal. Therefore many people would not agree with wanting to be exactly known as quote on quote ‘normal’ but they may want to assimilate to norms because that person is or may be in a unique way socially accepted.
A case could be made that the Great Divergence ultimately grew on the basis of
When it comes to choice it always seems to be a love hate relationship: we hate making them, but we can’t live without them. Anyone can all look back to a time in our lives where they wish someone could just pick for us, or times when we wish there were more to choose from. All Americans have many choices, and it is such a part of our daily lives that we don’t even realize it. Barry Schwartz and Sheena Iyengar‘s TED talks bring up interesting ideas about choice, how people deal with them and their affects. They both state that although choice is good, it can also have negative effects. Schwartz explains what most people believe and experience with choice, while Iyengar shows cultural differences in choice making. Both Schwartz and Iyengar
Niall Ferguson’s thesis in his book “Civilization: The West and the Rest,” is to explain and prove why western civilization has exceeded the accomplishments of other nations throughout history up until present day. He attributes this world dominance to six “killer applications” the west had adopted and advanced beyond the means of any other civilizations. These applications were: competition, science, private property, medicine, consumption, and work.
1. The “Great Divergence” is term that describe how in American for thirty-three years the inequality between the wealthy and not wealthy gap keeps increasing. Although this has been happening for a long a time, it is presume either natural or inevitable by others. However, Noah’s understanding of the “Great Divergence” differs. He believes it is neither natural nor inevitable. He states that the “Great Divergence, Part 2” describes the dramatic gap between an ordinary people, and the ones who consume the big money in the U.S. Which are the undeniably rich, the really rich, and the sticking Rick. Noah has a concerned over Part 2 because the gap has dramatically increase between the last three to four decades.
The top 10 percent during the Great Divergence has increased their share of income nationally from 34 percent to 48 percent. The top 5 percent, top 1 percent, top .1 percent, and top .01 percent also increased their share of income by a significant amount during the Great Divergence (147). These rich people in America have quickly expanded their income much quicker than rich people do in other countries (147). I agree that this trend in income expansion has contributed greatly to the Great Divergence. The ease that the top 10 percent seems to have of gaining money I agree does contribute very much to the divergence between those at the top and those in the middle.
The rise of the West refers to a period of time when Western Europe rose to power due to many environmental, political, and social factors. Many historians attribute the Rise of the West to the time period of 1450 to 1850. This power surge of Western Europe has been attributed to the global dominance of Western Europe and America in the 21 century. The interesting aspect regarding the Rise of the West is how Western Europe developed so differently from other parts of the world, leading it to be the superpower of the world. Over the past 50 years, the idea of the rise of the West has been closely re-examined. Prior to the 1950s, historians believed that the rise of the West occurred because it was destined to; because Europe is the best and
The ted talk “The Linguistic Genius of Babies” by Kuhl (2010) tells about babies are genius on language learning, and shows some results of research as proof of this idea. The article “Learning a Language as an Adult” by Pakenham, McEntire, and Williams (2013) shows an idea about the “critical period hypothesis”, children during this period learn much better than people older than this age, especially in pronunciation, because their brain activities are different than adults during this time. Personally, I totally believe the idea of children younger learn better, because the scientific research and data are shown to audiences, and they are persuasive enough. And I do see proof in my life, like four of my Korean friends who came China around
In Martin Seligman’s TED talk, he explains the values of positive psychology’s impact on creating happier lives. In 2000, Martin Seligman created a new field of psychology called Positive Psychology. This field of positive psychology is the study of positive traits and behaviors that can contribute to a positive “happier” life. In Seligman’s TED talk, The New Positive Era of Psychology, he categorizes positive lives into three categories. The Pleasant life, the life of engagement, and the meaningful life. But before he begins his speech, he explains the negative actions taken by psychology when treating people.
Jamie Oliver’s Ted Talk “Teaching every child about food,” captures his great passion and investment in fighting childhood obesity, improving children’s health, and lengthening their life expectancy. Obesity affects not just those that are obese, but family, friends, community, and country. The healthcare expense for obesity in the United States per year is two hundred and ten billion per year and growing, this expense is then passed down to Americans who have to pay more money in health insurance premiums as well as tax dollars to help cover this massive expense. (Oliver, J., 2010)
The early western world benefitted from revenues from trading European products to the Eastern countries (Pomeranz, 2000). High earnings obtained from trading with eastern countries and sales of slave established seven percent profit per annum, which is a “relatively high rate of return considering the high rate of depreciation on pre-industrial capital stocks, which limited the amount of savings and capital accumulation”, stated Pomeranz (2000). Many theories suggest that the Great Divergence occurred as a result of trade development from Europe to Asia, which later on became the main factor of the New World. As, Pomeranz (2000) stated, “the greatest significant advantage for Europe was the vast amount of fertile, uncultivated land in the North America which could be used to grow large quantities of farm products required to sustain European economic growth and allowed labour and land to be freed up in Europe for industrialization.” A great example of this is how England saved approximately 23-25 million acres of agricultural space by importing goods such