Nicholas Carr's 'Is Google Making USupid'

While reading a famous article by Nicholas Carr titled “Is Google Making us Stupid?,” I have concluded that it is not. I disagree with Carr’s argument because his view point corresponds with how technology is advancing. The way that the internet has shaped our lives has taken a great toll on the way we view the world now. There are a couple of ways that technology is improving. One would include books that are paperback turning into nooks and kindles along with blogging and texting. Another study shows that our brains are also changing and growing along with the internet. This shows that technology had advanced from the 70’s and 80’s when there wasn’t widespread access to the internet.

With the rise of technology and the staggering availability of information, the digital age has come about in full force, and will only grow from here. Any individual with an internet connection has a vast amount of knowledge at his fingertips. As long as one is online, he is mere clicks away from Wikipedia or Google, which allows him to find what he needs to know. Despite this, Nicholas Carr questions whether Google has a positive impact on the way people take in information. In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr explores the internet’s impact on the way people read. He argues that the availability of so much information has diminished the ability to concentrate on reading, referencing stories of literary types who no longer

Nicholas Carr’s Is Google Making Us Stupid? explains the impact the Internet is having on his (and others) patience with in depth reading habits, and possibly the way their brain is processing information. The old days of having to spend hours researching a subject are long gone because of the Internet. Having such a powerful tool available at any time can be a good and bad thing wrapped up in the same package. Over the last couple decades, home computer and smartphone ownership has been on a steady rise with most homes now having multiple devices. Therefore, having unlimited information available at all times has become a reality.

In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Nicholas Carr expresses his beliefs and personal experiences on how the internet has altered our brains and how we think. He addresses the fact that, although our brains’ abilities to deep read and concentrate are suffering, the internet is extremely beneficial and convenient. Because of the easy accessibility, it takes little to no effort to find information, and therefore, a minimal amount of thinking is required. Carr highlights that people are more impatient because of the internet and that our minds are becoming more erratic. The author used research, conducted by a U.K. educational consortium, to show that a new form of reading is developing over time; rather than reading every word on a page, it has turned to more of a skimming method. Nicholas Carr realizes that we may be doing more reading than ever due to the internet, but it is different in the way that people have to interpret the text. Reading, unlike talking, is not a natural ability. One must learn to deep read, make connections, and translate the underlying meaning. Overall, Carr believes it is a mistake to rely fully on computers because in the end, it will just be our own intelligence that morphs into artificial intelligence.

Consistently there is some new innovative progression advancing into the world trying to make life simpler for individuals. In the article, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?", writer Nicholas Carr clarifies his contemplations on how he trusts the web is risking making individuals loaded with simulated information. Carr starts by clarifying how he feels that the web is bringing on his center issues, how he can never again be totally submerged in a book, and the motivation behind why he gets restless while perusing. He then goes ahead to discuss how his life is encompassed by the web and how that is the fault for the issues he has towards not having the capacity to stay associated with a content; however, in the meantime says how and why the web has been a

When assessing the risks of digital technology’s role in our future, many reflect on the developments of new technology throughout history. Nicholas Carr, author of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” uses historical examples to support his claim that we should fear technological advancements. In contrast, Brooke Gladstone and Josh Neufeld, authors of “The Influencing Machines,” examine both sides of the issue and ultimately conclude that we should not fear technological development. One technological development Carr as well as Gladstone and Neufeld examined was the printing press. Carr asserts that most of the arguments about the printing press turned out to be correct including that it “would undermine religious authority, demean the work of scholars

Throughout his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr uses several terms and phrases that enhance his argument. One key term that is central to Carr’s argument is the word “reprogramming”. Carr uses this word several times throughout his article to assert his claim that the Internet is “reprogramming” or changing our minds in a way that alters our thinking and memory. By using this term, it seems that Carr adds gravity to the possibility that the Internet is changing our minds for the worst. Likewise, Carr mentions that the Internet is interfering with our “concentration” and causing it to “drift” from certain activities such as deep reading. He argues that our brain is scattering with frequent use of the Internet. It is hard

In Nicholas Carr's story "Is Google Making Us Stupid" his fundamental point is the issue, is fast access to the web making people more restless to peruse and need to skim through stuff more. This story is an extremely well useful story. Carr uses google as a similitude for the more extensive web. At the point when Carr poses the question is google making us inept, he may have set an alert for some. In the story he gets profound clarification of how the web impacts the cerebrum. The clarification he gives us is the way PCs have modified the way we work, how we sort out data, offer news, convey, and how we hunt down, read, and assimilate data. Carr's investigation joins research, and additionally reasoning, science, history, and social advancements.

With the rise of technology, society is beginning to wonder if it is helping or hurting us. Many people privileged enough to have technology, argue that though technology is helping the world advance, it is altering our thoughts and perceptions. In Nicholas Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” he blatantly calls out the current generation and expresses his concerns about how the internet is changing the way people interpret information. Carr’s main claim is that the internet is causing people to lose their ability to concentrate and think on their own. Google can affect our cognition but depending on its uses it can make people smarter.

In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr argues that easy access to information on the internet causes a shorter attention span, and makes people incapable to solve problems unassisted. According to Carr, typical readers have become lazy because of being spoiled by the access of thousands of sources of information that can be found on the internet. Rather than reading a book, or doing thorough research on a subject, the reader will commonly answer a question by searching for it on the internet. This method not only diminishes the attention span, but also comes off as lazy due to the fact that the reader won’t put in the time and effort it takes to actually learn a subject.

There is a strange feeling, tinkering with my brain almost reprogramming my memory. Nicholas Carr explains it better in his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”. Nicholas feels as if his mind isn't going, but changing. The traditional process of thought is being supplied and reshaped by the Internet. The Internet has created a rich store of information, but at what cost? With the Internet obtaining the ability to consume almost all other intellectual technologies, we must learn more to appreciate life before machines.

In any discussion of the internet, one controversial issue is that the internet is causing more harm than good. On the one hand, Nicholas Carr, writer of “Is Google making us Stupid?” argues that it has caused damaging effects to his brain and memory. On the other hand, Mr. Carr contends that there are many blessings that come with the internet. My own view is mixed as well. The internet can begin to answer virtually any question I may have. However, I have notice the attention span of the people around me is slowly decreasing. With Google doing most of the thinking for us we are no longer forced to memorize thing. So when it comes to the internet are we really losing or winning?

As the internet offers us the benefits of quick and easy knowledge, it is affecting the brain’s capacity to read longer articles and books. Carr starts Is Google Making Us Stupid with the closing scene from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey when Dave taking apart the memory circuits that control HAL, the artificial brain of the ship. Carr feels the time he spends online is rewiring his brain. He is no longer able to concentrate long enough to read more than a few paragraphs. Even though the internet is useful, it seems to be changing the way our brain takes in information. He feels as though this brain wants to take information in the same way the internet disperses it: in

The internet is our conduit for accessing a wide variety of information. In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” Nicholas Carr discusses how the use of the internet affects our thought process in being unable to focus on books or longer pieces of writing. The author feels that “someone, or something, has been tinkering with [his] brain” over the past few years (Carr 731). While he was easily able to delve into books and longer articles, Carr noticed a change in his research techniques after starting to use the internet. He found that his “concentration often [started] to drift after two or three pages” and it was a struggle to go back to the text (Carr 732). His assertion is that the neural circuits in his brain have changed as a

Carr also brings to attention the importance of language and how technologies that rebuild dialect have a tendency to apply the most grounded impact over our scholarly lives. He quotes Walter J. Ong, “Technologies are not mere exterior aids but also interior transformations of consciousness” (51). He argues that the Internet and its consequences for human consciousness can't completely be considered without noticing the Internet as the latest development in a class of advancements known as " intellectual technologies," which have depicted the way of human awareness through history: He explains the arousing and deep thinking involved when one reads an actual book in contrast with the internet reading which is quick and full of distractions.