Nicholas II Biography

It all began in 1894 when a man named Alexander III (Tsar of Russia), died leaving his son Nicholas II to become the tsar of Russia at the age of 26. In 1894 Nicholas married Alexander the princess of Germany; they had 5 children, 4 girls and a boy. There only son Alexei was born with hemophilia.

I personally believe that Nicholas II was responsible for his own downfall. Although there was definitely contributing factors, his naive attitude and inability to effectively rule a country caused his downfall. Nicholas failed to trust key advisors such as Witte and Stolypin and despite him issuing the October Manifesto; he preserved his own autocratic power through the fundamental laws, which the Russian people didn’t like. He failed to think and plan ahead to create a better future for Russia, he didn’t think like a leader should. Even though the war was already a huge strain

Nicholas II was the last tsar of Russia under Romanov rule. Nicolas II was to inherit the throne after his father died, but he was not prepared to. You will soon read that if he was properly prepared then he would’ve had a magic life. Tsar Nicholas II aroused the Russian Revolution.

Soldiers lacked weapons, food, and sufficient communication. As the war continued, unrest of the Russian people grew (Voglsinger). The Romanov family was not completely disconnected from the war. The Romanov daughters worked diligently in the hospital wing of the palace aiding wounded soldiers, as well as keeping them company while healing (Yudina). In the middle of the Revolution all of the children fell ill with the measles, Anastasia being the last to catch the illness. The children were alone with their mother while Nicholas II was at the General Headquarters in Mogilev (Yudina). While he was there, Nicholas received war reports and met with Nikolai Vladimirovich Ruzskii, a military leader (Raleigh). In attempt to not worry his family he hid the actual reason for being in Mogilev (Yudina). The Romanov family had been in control of Russia for three centuries until March 1917 when Nicholas II relinquished the throne hoping to prevent civil war (Biography.com). Following the abdication of the throne, Nicholas II returned to his family where they were under house arrest. In August the family decided it would be best to move to a small Siberian city, Tobolsk (Yudina). The family moved into their mansion and lived quiet lives rarely taking walks outside or to church. The Bolsheviks had taken control of Russia and Nicholas II was summoned to his trial in Moscow (Yudina). When Empress

Tsar Nicholas II was a poor leader. It seems that he does not want to be the Tsar (71). When the Tsar received the telegram of the destruction of the Russian fleet a Tsushima, he simply placed into his pocket. He shows no interest in being a leader. A normal would have quickly reacted to that situation but the Tsar did not. During his reign (Nicholas II), Russia was in disaster (72). Forcing someone to do something, that person does not want to do will lead to disaster. He such a "leader" that Kaiser Wilhelm II patronizes him of "only fit to live in a country house and grow turnips." (9). The man has no strength, his is everything but strength. There are many holes in the government of Russia and in his leadership. The holes could have been filled up if he had picked up the slack and pushed himself to be leader. The resulting consequences of his poor leadership could have also been

Nicholas II was known, not only for being the Emperor of Russia but also for his character and personality which undoubtably led him to his own downfall. Nicholas was often referred to as not being ready to become Tsar as well as being a weak leader. Firstly, Nicholas II himself, amongst a very large proportion of Russian society, believed that he was not prepared to be coronated Emperor. Nicholas himself stated “What is going to happen to me and all of Russia? I am not prepared to be a Tsar. I never wanted to become one. I know nothing of the business of ruling.”. (Russian Revolution Quotations 2015). Nicholas was aware of what he was getting himself into and that he was not prepared for such a role. This is further corroborated by the

The lower class of Russia, which was composed of the working people felt misrepresented- or not represented at all.Nicholas II was the son of Alexander III of Russia, who was also the Emperor of Russia, before Nicholas. He was the heir of approximately 200 years of Czarist rule in Russia.Coming from a very rich family, Nicholas could hardly relate to the lower class. He had inherited Russia’s rule from his dad, and was not elected, which meant he was not necessarily qualified to correctly rule Russia, as he later proved through his actions.After he had angered the working class by slaughtering their own people, losing major battles in the war with Japan as well as in WWI, there was no way for him to amend for the mistakes he had made. Therefore, had the people been given the choice of taking down the Czar, they would have not hesitated.Their anger was represented through Lenin, with whom they felt they could connect to.Due to their dislike for the Czar, not many were dissatisfied when he was overthrown, and lated ordered to be executed by

Various aspects of Nicholas II’s political decisions reflected his clear unsuitability for the role of Tsar, and these decisions form a preliminary basis for both his own legacy of incompetency & the eventual undoing of the Romanovs. In comparison to rulers preceding, Nicholas was ill-prepared for the role: his father, Alexander III, failed to adequately develop his son’s understanding of civil & state responsibilities before his death in 1894, under the guise that he would live long enough to teach Nicholas of these affairs. Upon his consecration as Tsar, Nicholas spoke in his diary of his apprehensiveness

After the revolution there were several impacts, both positive and negative. Nicholas II abdicated which ended the Romanov dynasty after 300 years. He and his family were assassinated on 17 July 1918. Vladimir Lenin, the Bolshevik leader became the permanent ruler. He created free education throughout Russia (though children learned communist ideas, they were still being education about the world) and made an eight-hour working day, improving working conditions. Churches were burned down and religious leaders were killed. Russia backed out of the World War I on December 15 when Russia signed an armistice with Germany and Austria, pending a formal peace treaty. Lenin was desperate to end the war, as the Germans were threatening to

On the 20th October 1894 Nicholas II ascended the throne as tsar of Russia. He idolised the concept of continuing to rule Russia under the autocratic system, in the same way his father and predecessor Alexander III had done so. However, Nicholas lacked the qualities and characters of the autocratic style of leadership. The

Meanwhile, food shortages and poor working conditions also led to strikes. This led to the defeat of Nicholas II, who lost control of the Petrograd and the support of some key political leaders. Nicholas left the throne on March 15, 1917. (Goff p.140). Russian citizens lost faith in Nicholas due to many factors, but most notably was Russia’s poor performance in World War I. Germany proved to be too industrialized for Russia to put up much of a fight, and Russia was forced to

However, Nicholas’s personality was not the sole reason why the Old Regime collapsed. Chubarov argues that “another Peter the Great could have saved the Romanovs and Imperial Russia. It is obvious though that the last tsar could not” . Nicholas’s lack of

Importance of Events Between 1894 and the Decline of the Romanov Dynasty The execution of Tsar Nicholas II and his family in July 1918 signalled the brutal end of a Romanov Dynasty that had survived for hundreds of years in Russia. Such a dynasty had relied on a system known as 'Tsarism'- that is, having a single man ruling the entire Russian empire. Whilst the revolution of 1918 is often seen as being the sole, definitive end to this dictatorial system it was in truth, the final blow in a long sequence of ill-fated events. The Romanov Dynasty had been in rapid decline for a number of years, with inopportune events first beginning to accumulate between the years 1894-1905.

Nicholas II was born on May 18, 1868 in Pushkin, Russia. Nicholas inherited the throne when his father Alexander III died in 1894. Nicholas ascended the throne at the age of 26. He ruled an empire covering about one sixth of the Earth’s land area. Nicholas as tsar was ‘autocrat of all Russia’s’, and saw himself as chosen by God to fill the role. His empire was at peace and in the early stages of industrialization, ranked among the worlds great powers. Nicholas believed it was his duty to continue the autocracy that he inherited and stated, ‘I shall uphold the principle of autocracy as firmly and as undeviatingly as did my late father’. Nicholas was a conservative leader with few of the skills needed to effectively rule 132 million people. Nicholas was

Then his older brother, Constantine, second in line to the throne, formally abdicated any share in the line of succession. Now, should anything happen to Alexander, the entire Russian Empire would fall into Nikolai's lap.