Nicolas Wolterstorff Analysis

Explanation of how hope of the resurrection plays a role in comforting Wolterstorff is present, with detail and many examples, and shows a deep understanding.

Moreover, he was crucified because of pardoning our sin. I know this stories about Jesus, but, at that time, Jesus existentially came to me as the incarnation. I realized that Jesus Christ is my lord but also sincere friend as he came down to Zacchaeus in the plan of God. This is my experience of and understanding God and God’s love.

It is 11/29/1853 and today is the first election of the kansas territory, John whitfield is selected as the territory's first delegate to congress. The real person to represent the kansas territory is Andrew h. Reeder and he is so excited to be a role model to the kansas environment and be a good representative. There is only one problem they are having trouble getting present franklin pierce to sign. He did not want to give up his spot but eventually he had to give it up because there was a new person but he could not face the fact that there was a new

Why humans suffer and where God is during it are theological questions that have constantly been debated on. Rabbi Kushner in the PBS video Suffering: A Time to Love and a Time to Hate, John F. Haught in his book Responses to 101 Questions on God and Evolution, and the Bible each provide their own analysis on where God is when humans are suffering and persecuted. Thomas West is his chapter “The Human Response of Hope” gives his insight regarding life after death especially hope for salvation. All these sources aid in answering personal questions regarding theodicy: suffering, death, and hope.

Daniel Weintraub in the article, ‘’ River Restoration Project Offers a Sprinkling of Hope ’’ states that interest groups are collaborating with each other to benefit people and exposes that through the river restoration project, their teams are developing. Weintraub supports his point by showing that he researched about the issue of the river restoration project. The author’s purpose is to show that he is a writer who uses straightforward vocabulary words; in his article he makes the reader understand his main purpose of writing the article. The author writes in a formal tone for the audience to best understand his analysis of the restoration project.

Martin Wittfooth, born in 1981, is not only an illustrator, but a fine artist as well. He earned his MFA (Master of Fine arts) at the school of Visual Arts in New York City. Wittfooth’s oil paintings explore themes of industry and nature, evolution, comparison of old ideologies and modern fears, and the growth of human nature on Earth itself; these themes are recognized through symbolism, allusions, issues, and fears. His work, without a doubt, has the ability to engage both the eye and the mind of the viewer.

Within oneself, there is an urge to be recognized. To fit into a society while at the same time becoming a distinct figure. In the book Old School by Tobias Wolff, the unnamed main character experiences both the struggle to conform to a boarding school, and the inward soul-capturing questions of what is right. The tangible tension within this character allows the reader to ponder the development of a renowned writer and what it truly takes to reach a point of content.

When this question is personalized, it becomes the most important question one will ever be asked or answer. Who is Jesus Christ to YOU? Jesus said, "I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly" (John 10:10, NKJV). In 1 John 5:11-13 we are told that if we have the son in our life we can KNOW that we have eternal life. Jesus is the only way for us to live an abundant life here on earth, or receive eternal life in fellowship with God. Jesus died on the cross to take the punsihment for our sins so that we could be sinless in the eyes of God. If we do not receive the free gift of eternal life by experiencing the forgiveness achieved by Jesus, then we will receive the punishment we

It affirms that God attributed the sins and guilt of humankind to Jesus, Who in place of man, received that punishment that humanity would have otherwise deserved. Jesus’ actions signified the payment of the sins of humankind, which settled both the righteousness and wrath of God so that sinners could be forgiven without God Himself compromising His holy standard. In essence, according to the penal substitution theory of the reformers, Jesus died in place of man, in the process accounting for the sins of man and bearing them. The act of Jesus taking the sins of man indicates that Jesus carried the cross of every believer, setting him free and safe from all the penal demands of God’s law. In this context, the holiness of God and the righteousness of His law are accounted for by the substitution. Notably, in modern theology, the penal aspect has been a stumbling block despite being regarded as one of the dominant atonement in the bible. According to the model, Jesus paid man’s ransom on his crucifixion. However, this view only works because Christ was paying man’s penalty. Therefore, Christians should be inspired by the self-sacrifice acts of Jesus on the cross. In addition, Jesus’ death and resurrection implied significant victories over death, hell, and sin in our union with him and God. Lastly, God accomplished his mission to reconcile the world with Him despite various trespasses by

Chapter 9: Why Is There So Much Suffering?, pp. 77-87 In the introduction of this chapter, the Dr. White cited several tragic situations in which, both, believer and non-believers experienced great suffering and emotional pain. It is not unusual for these tragedies to prompt seekers to inquire, especially of those faiths that believe in a loving , personal, caring God — such as Christianity — “Why should God allow this pain and suffering?” The author believes the answer lies within what is called free will, and he seeks to bring a solution to this inquiry in the remainder of this chapter.

Because God is love, He feels the pains, the torment, the agony, and the injustice we feel. The Bible talking about Jesus states, “For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:1). The Lord saw the affliction of His people, and heed their cries and send Moses to deliver His people out of Egypt (Exodus 3:7). Then again, the Bible tells us at one point that God could not bear the misery of His people (Judges 10:16). “A father to the fatherless, a defender of widows, is God in his holy dwelling” (Psalms 68:5 NIV). God’s love is demonstrated in His justice, ““Because of the devastation of the afflicted, because of the groaning of the

Free choice- A large argument in the theological world is whether or not we have free will or if we are completely controlled by god. The argument made in the book is that suffering is an example of the fact that we still do have free will to make our own choices. There are times when we are given a choice and many time people choose the path that goes against god and because of that there is suffering. As we actively or passively choose to turn our back to god in different situations we are then forced to reap the consequence. God would not be the one to make the choice that we would turn our back to him, therefore showing that the belief in god does not forfeit our free

Consequently, Peter’s theme was telling about the grace of God involves suffering through Christ. “The most important emphasis in Peter’s thought about God is that of the divine providence in human suffering. The sufferings of which Peter speaks are not those of physical afflictions, natural evils, or accidents, or the sort of ordinary tragedy that besets all human beings. It is the sufferings people are called upon to endure because they are Christians. The trials they are called upon to endure (1:6) are false accusations of wrongdoing (1:12), which may be so strong as to be called a fiery ordeal (4:12). They may suffer simply because they are Christians (4:16).”

The atonement of Christ, or the bringing about of our salvation by Jesus on the Cross, is a dividing issue for various theological traditions. The end goal of each theory is to conclude how Christ’s death brings salvation, and what exactly Christ’s death saved Christians from. Each view reaches their own conclusions as to what the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus accomplished. When comparing and contrasting the details of the Christus Victor and the Penal Substitution theories of the atonement a major difference at the heart of the debate is whether or not Christ needed to die primarily to be an expiation, the Christus Victor model, or a propitiation, the Penal Substitution model. In general, the expiation theory focuses on sin and death as the problem that Jesus comes to solve. In contrast, the propitiation model of atonement focuses on Jesus as the solution to God’s wrath and inability to forgive us for our sins. While the expiation and propitiation theories are two different ways of looking at the atonement, the Christus Victor and Penal Substitution views are held within those broader contextual categories.

“Why does God let men suffer?” That is the most common question made by atheists. On the other hand people, such as Billy Graham, believed that God lets us suffer to test us. Billy Graham believes God does this “because we don’t know how strong we are” (Billy Graham). Pain exists because of humankind's choice to sin, its origin, scholars’ views, and contemporary suffering.