preview

Niemi's Argument Analysis

Decent Essays

Niemi (2011) makes the argument that there is a greater need for civics classes at an early age in order to increase political knowledge that students have in the future. The premise is that political attention and voting are habitual, and promoting these values at a young age may create a type of inertia that will carry out throughout their lives. In order to be successful, however, I would argue that simply presenting information about political events and actors would not be sufficient. Neimi makes the statement earlier that American students are struggling in mathematics and science, but then contents that simply adding more classes with have a positive effect on civics. Instead of simply adding more avenues of information for students, it makes more theoretical sense to make these classes active. Social Learning Theory (Bandura, 1977) would argue that in order to gain benefits of habitual voting, they would need to rehearse the practice of voting. Given that many High-school students cannot vote, it would be up to the civics classes to simulate the experience of voting in a tangible way for the students to receive benefits. …show more content…

Fishbein (1979) argues that intentions are the strongest predictor of behavior, and issues arise in changing behavior when behavioral outcomes and actions are conflated. A behavioral outcome is a grand, general goal. An example would “being a good citizen.” A behavioral action is a specific occurrence that contributes to an outcome, but does not completely satisfy the outcome. An example would be voting as an indicator of being a good citizen. Voting plays a role in being a good citizen, but it doesn’t completely satisfy it. The suggestion by Niemi, then, that providing more political information in the classroom and motivating students to pursue it outside the classroom is one that is simply one behavioral action that is being

Get Access