Nike Case Study
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
For Master of Business Administration Degree
Tiffin University at University of Bucharest
Information and Decision Support Course
By
Ciprian Jitaru
Instructor: Prof. John J. Millar Ph.D.
Dean Emeritus and Professor of Management
Cohort 9
November 06, 2010
1. What external and internal pressures did Mark Parker face when he assumed the leadership of Nike, and how did he respond to this challenges?
In order to understand the challenges that Mark Parker had we need to know what the internal and external business environment was. Speaking about external environment in that period Adidas become more powerful in the U.S. market trough the
…show more content…
This decision allowed Nike to develop an entire new range of products and increased sales and profitability.
3. Part of the strategic management is accomplished via SWOT analysis. What is the evidence that the leadership at Nike is making use of this tool?
SWOT analysis is part of environment analysis , strength and weakness is part of internal environment, threats and opportunities are linked to external environment.
Looking at the strategic decision made by Nike it is clear that they used SWOT analysis. We can see that they looked at the internal environment and establish the strengths-specially the fact that the main strength of Nike is innovation. The best proof that Parker identified innovation as the main strength is the fact that he established the Explore group and he involved himself in the Nike+iPod program.
The threat that was identified trough SWOT analysis was the Adidas which become bigger after buying Reebok. Trough the acquisition of Reebok, Adidas became not only bigger but also it gained a much more powerful position on the US market, because Reebok was an American company and had a better understanding of the U.S marke 5002006132t.
Shifting the brand focus from product-based to customer-driven focus it a proof that Nike leadership used SWOT to analyze the opportunities in the market .Analyzing the opportunity showed that customers need
Innovation: In such a mature and competitive industry, continuous innovation is crucial to the success of the company as it gives a unique selling point that rivals do not have. Both product and process innovation are Nike’s
The factors that drive Nike’s decision to stick with its current organizational structure include its well-established brand name in the industry. The company positioned itself as a brand
The aim of this report is to utilize the “Nike - The art of selling air” case study, and other lessons from the strategic marketing theorem to identify marketing challenges; and how those challenges could be best addressed using the previously described marketing principles
6). This strategy is a major component of Nike’s business strategic level plan. In applying this strategy, Nike has attained a great deal of consumer insight, which it uses to offer uniquely designed premium products to the athletes. Still on product differentiation, Nike focuses more on research and development at a greater level. These unique features to Nike, have transformed the competition levels in this competitive industry, leading to a trend of a paradigm shift in the market. Most consumers opt for Nike branded sports products and apparels, at the expense of the other brand names.
Swot analysis refers to the strength, weaknesses, opportunities and the threats that a business faces. Every company has its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats that it faces.
Nike’s main strategy revolves around product branding. Their brand compromises of a swoosh logo which is accompanied by a message of “just do it”. The logo was imprinted on all of their products with the message developed to express the individuality of their target group. The branding was further promoted by Nike’s relentless approach on the quality of their product as demonstrated when considering overseas business opportunities, quality must not be compromised in order to do so. This ensures consumer satisfaction and loyalty towards Nike.
Understanding customer needs will help Nike to define new market opportunities and drive innovation and revenue growth in every aspect of its organisation. The most basic concept underlying marketing is that of human needs. Human needs are states of felt deprivation (Kotler and Armstrong, 2006). Customer logic is derived from evaluation of a company and its product based upon customer needs, customer benefits, and product features. For branded athletic shoes, Nike has to understand customer needs on a global level as the products are sold
Nike is known as one of the most consistently innovative companies for its technologically advanced products. As Nike stated, Innovation is the company’s heart in its business growth strategy because it helps them to become more sustainable company and to keep up with the competition and customer demands (nikeandunderarmour.com, 2015). Therefore, Nike vision innovation is a key business success of the company. It invests
NIKE‘s unique value proposition has been on the innovative design, finesse and quality of their Product line. Innovation has been a constant driving factor of NIKE since its inception.
After sluggish focus and growth in the 1980ies, Nike experienced strong growth in the 1990ies and cemented the position as global recognizable brand. The increased international focus created strains on the supply chain, which was consider inadequate to cater efficiently to the organization and the rapid changes consumer demands . As a consequence of the afore mentioned supply chain problem Nike faced inefficient inventory management, problems in flow of goods and poor demand
Nike‘s vertical structure includes CEO Mark Parker and a board of directors chaired by co-founder Phil Knight. Although Nike has functional divisions and divisions based on specific products it is not a matrix organization. In a matrix organization, employees report to a functional and divisional manage. At Nike, employees report to the divisional manager and the president of each division reports directly to the CEO. Nike’s continued product innovation and successful marketing are due to the combination of functional and divisional organization using an operations department to insure communication between divisions. There is division of labor but it is not clearly identified. With a more pronounced division of labor and levels of direct supervision Nike can improve its
Enderle, K., Hirsch, D., Micka, L., Saving, B., Shah, S., Szerwinski, T. (2000, March 14). Strategic Analysis of Nike, Inc. Retrieved on December 14, 2005, from
One of Nike’s main opportunities is product development. Developing their product range makes them more competitive and because products tend to go out of fashion quickly, Nike must introduce new products relatively fast because consumer demand the newest and latest products. Increase in internet shopping will no doubt reduce the cost and improve prices making them even more competitive.
SWOT analysis is a useful tool for understanding and decision-making for all sorts of situations in business and organization. SWOT analysis can be classified into internal and external factors affecting a company. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the SWOT analysis represent the internal factors that influence the viability of the company. While the Opportunities and Threats, on the other hand, are the external factors that may affect the company's performances. A SWOT analysis provides more understanding of the organization in relation to its internal and external environment so that manager can formulate better strategy in pursuit of its mission.
Report on the Case Study Nike This report has been produced to provide an insight into the consumer decision-making process, buyer behaviour factors that consumers of Nike are influenced by. The report also details recommendations based on the findings. 2.0 Summary = =