Nine Lives By Ursula K. L Guin Analysis

Just because someone wasn’t made by man or created by two human beings doesn’t mean they’re not human or express human characteristics. Throughout the novel, the author shows us ways how the humans discredit the clones, basically reminding them they will never be like them and they are at there in the world to only be donors and that’s it. To the humans, the clones are there for one reason and one reason only to be beneficial to the society, while the clones want to feel accepted and envision a future for their selves but are reminded that it will never happen for them. The clones want to experience things that humans do and venture the outside world and see what it’s like but at the end of the day it’s just a fairytale to them. The humans want to make it clear that they will never prevail in life at nothing other than being a donor and a success to society. Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go address certain conflicts and roadblocks of the clones through the clones versus humans motif, whereas the clones have feelings and want to envision their future like a human but the humans stay trying to remind them that they’re not and dehumanize them by making them feel different.

There is also overpopulation. If cloning is widely done than that can lead to overpopulation of animals. If there is an overpopulation and animals that means that people may be driven from natural resources. Without natural resources we can't make more clones because all the other clones you made will be eating everything that the new clones are trying to make will need. if we clone humans then there is a great chance of those humans reproducing, then those children of the Clones will reproduce and there will be a larger population which will mean we will have to put laws on having children and on making clones. in conclusion clones are bad thing if we want to keep the Earth's resources and we don't want

There is plainly a huge measure of moral and good stresses as for human cloning. Human life is acknowledged to be important and blessed. Cloning certainly is now and again successful the principal gone through, which infers that human creating leaves will fail miserably. Most would concur that cloning is like murder or manslaughter in any occasion. For the people who don't assume that life is holy, it is basically tissue being disposed of. Cloning is hostile. The most vital piece of a man is their soul, soul or psyche and cloning does not enable one to accomplish this, it rather enables one to endeavor to accomplish some hereditary standard. There is no hobby for cloning, it is inhumane to the point that there are people on this planet with to a great degree cruel desires and human cloning would take into account military utilize. For instance, a country that could clone people could make a massive outfitted power that could attempt to expect control distinctive countries and provoke boundless wars of emotionless men. Individuals should be made through an exhibition of love and not a show of science. One that is cloned can never again be seen as a man, as your identity isn't generally essentially yours; you are giving it to someone else. Another case for instance, if mental oppressor seats had the ability to clone then the world would be an extensively all the more startling spot reliably in fear of being ambushed at any dark time. This, and in addition human cloning could

Initially, when reflecting on how people are connected to one another, what comes to mind are the social ties. For example, I see myself connected to people through my relationship with them. With my family and friends, I see us connected through our shared DNA and experiences. However, certain relationships form through other connections such as common interest and background history. Now with technology, a vast number of people connect and reconnect virtually with just the click of a button. More recently, I’ve also considered deeper connections people have such as their struggles/hardships and values/beliefs. Of all the distinct cultures, religions, and nationalities, I believe the strongest bond that connects us all are the problems we face as humans. Moreover, from the issues humans face comes solidarity, compassion, and even love for another.

Because sometimes even twins who has the same DNA dont even look alike or has the same personalities so what do you expect from a cloned human. Therefore, no one should have any expectations from cloned people.

One of the many reasons why clones are like humans is because these clones have feelings like regular people. For example, Kathy is deeply in love with Tommy ever since they were younger, because of his organ donations, she watches him suffer from pain until his death, and Tommy doesn't have a choice except to die. The clones are going through pains just like normal people, for example, love and grief. Another example is that the clones can think critically like normal humans. During the book you can see Kathy's thought process, she wondered what made her different from her teachers and Madame. Since she was curious Kathy wanted to see what would happen if her friends surrounded Madame. She wondered how she would react . When her experiment finally happened, Madame froze and looked at the students as if they were aliens. After this situation, Kathy perspective on life changed completely, on the ending of page 36 she states, "The first time you glimpse yourself through the eyes of a person like that, it's a cold moment. It's like walking past a mirror you've walked past every day of your life, and suddenly it shows you something else, something troubling and strange.". Reading these lines clearly shows how smart Kathy is, and any being who can make theories like she does could be considered a critical thinker. And to conclude on why clones can be considered

In NLMG this attitude towards the clones is apparent in the ways in which they are treated by other members of society, for instance, the grounds/property manager at the Cottages Keffers "A few of us, for a time, even tried to think of Keffers as a sort of guardian, but he was having none of it. You went up to greet him when he arrived in his van and he'd stare at you like you were mad" (117). This was an attitude that was shared by many of the non-clones in NLMG, even the ones who were their greatest allies. The technology to create them was there and the logical application for the program was sound, and yet the population at large did not know how to handle the realities of who and what these clones really were. The technological advancements in this world had eclipsed the population's abilities or capacities to handle the results of these advancements. As time went on the prospective empathy for these "students" went down as the similarities and paranoia for potential upheaval pushed the two groups further apart. In our own society, we are facing similar choices in the fact that we are creating international accessible digital copies of ourselves through the ways in which we use the internet. We are vicariously "cloning" ourselves digitally and the ramifications of this are just starting to come to the surface in how they will affect our world. There are only two options that I can see, we either change our approach and make technology work for us, bridging the gaps that separate us as individuals, as societies, as a culture, and as a species. Or we let technology, as a force of nature, an act of god, dictate the course of our lives in these orders of magnitude as was highlighted in E.M. Forster's 1909 short story "The Machine Stops". The people in the fictional future which Forster so accurately depicted were not only

This is primarily due not only to the biological equivalence that the clone holds to another human, but the psychological uniqueness that it holds from being a healthy human being without impairments. Furthermore, while the the moral status of the clone prior to birth may be disputable, this still does not serve proper grounds to justify modification as well as the clone, in the embryonic stage holds no dependencies to another moral person. Thus, as modern technology progresses, while clones may be seen as a new lucrative substitute to natural born humans in terms of menial work or military service, they should still be regarded as moral equals to natural born humans so long as moral persons are being cloned. Subsequently, these clones then deserve exemption from this type of coerced enslavement as well as any genetic modifications that enhance their abilities to fulfill these

cloning like any other medical experiment (johansen, 2001) . Second, cloning eliminates the need of reproduction, because from 1 individual you can have 100 copy that looks the same. No one will be unique anymore. Cloning is creating a body that does not contain a soul, it is creating just a zombie (Is human cloning wrong?, 2016). Third, psychology and physical harms to the person cloned will be present. This harm comes from the fact that the parents will treat the child as they have a second chance of him (Bhargava, 2010).

Lets take a visual examination. Now there are definitely advantages to such a technological advance. Very essential advantages of cloning include: availing rejuvenating a patient, inverting heart attacks, infertility, plastic, reconstructive and cosmetic surgery, and taking away defective genes and many other essential endowments. It does this by sanctioning scientists to abstract or engender incipient cells. Another advantage is the utilization of stem cells. These are cells, which are blank cells, and can become any other type of cell. They are utilized for cloning, making it more expeditious for medicos to find donors for sick people. This is because the patient would not repudiate it as it was a clone. If somebody was astringently burned and needed more skin cells, a medico would just have to clone a few stem cells, to make incipient skin cells for the patient. By doing this, it would avail many people. Cloning can avail parents or couples, who are infertile or have lost their children, to get a child or a clone of their child. Also, this could be acclimated to avail parents whose child is sick to make a clone of that child and then utilize the cloned child to donate blood, skin cells, etc. to avail the sick child become more preponderant. By doing this, it would avail many

In this case of a parent cloning himself in order to have a child, the parent would have preset notions of what the child should become and how the child’s life should progress (Bowring 2004: 401). This link between parent and offspring along with the predetermination of the clone’s future would have profound psychological and social ramifications; the clone would have the expectation of following same life path as the parent, trying to live up to these expectations of others and of his own would create a standard that would prevent individuality possibly leading to depression or even suicide (Nelkin 1992: 180). The psychological problems associated with creating clones of living people would be great. Another situation would be creating a clone of a deceased person; an example of this would be a family creating a clone of an elder member of that family who recently passed away. In this example, the family would know the life that the deceased person had lived and would expect the clone to behave similarly. The clone would have the same genetic makeup as the deceased family member, but the clone would live a completely different life because he was born in a completely different time. The family would experience grief because the clone would live differently than the person they had known and the clone would experience issues with the expectations placed on him. This creation of a clone would cause harm to all involved on an emotion level (Bottum 2001: 1). The

There will be lack of uniqueness and violate convictions regarding human individuality and freedom. Clones could be seen as less than human compared with non-clones.

One good factor about cloning is that if it eventually works out properly it can repair and rebuild organs of the body, and it can also cure ethnic diseases such as diabetes. But with that being said

One very beneficial thing about cloning is that it can be used for organ replacement which would not only minimize the waiting list for organs, but also there is a smaller risk of rejection from your body. Another is that it can be used to save an endangered species from dying out. Also something that would be incredibly useful is genetic research. If scientists were able to clone people easily and effectively, they would no longer need to use humans and they could solve genetic diseases. One thing that can be very risky with cloning is about 95% of animal cloning has ended in failure due to genetic defect. Clones are a lot more likely to get diseases and other various things like that. Also there would be a lack of uniqueness among clones and violate convictions regarding human individuality and freedom. Clones could be seen as less than human compared with non-clones. Other obvious risks are lack of diversity among clones and faster ageing causing them to die faster than a normal living thing would. Cloning is a process that we have to work on and is very tricky to work with but could be very helpful when done

In the short story, Ursula Guin writes, “we're a tenclone. John Chow's the name.” This quote directly shows that the ten clones all are referred to by the same first and last name but they all have differing middle names. Each clone looks identical in every way, except aht half of them are female so as to give reprisal for their needs whether they be social or sexual. Cloning creates the issue of individuality and a clones worth as a being, but as Dan Brock wrote, “Cloning could only undermine our genetic uniqueness, not our full individuality.” Again it is demonstrated the issue of a clones identity, harming its mind if it is ever treated as one and not a whole in its group of copies. This story tells of clones as only being a whole and not a seperate being, thus it makes them reliant on every part of this group to function as one which creates a considerable fault in this idea of cloning