Nitration of Methyl Benzoate

Different procedures were used to isolate benzil from the ether layer and benzoic acid from the aqueous layers. To isolate benzil, anhydrous MgSO4 was added to the flask containing the ether layer solution. MgSO4 removes the remaining water in the ether layer solution. After making sure that enough amount of MgSO4 present in the solution, the ether solution was filtered by using gravity filtration. During filtration, MgSO4 was removed from the solution and the ether solution was collected in 25 ml flask. To separate benzil from the filtered ether solution, the beaker containing the ether solution was heated until the ether evaporated. After letting the beaker to cool to room temperature, the mass of the beaker with the benzil crystals was measured. From the combined mass of the beaker and the benzil crystals and from the predetermined mass of the beaker, the mass of the collected crystals was calculated to be 0.266 gram.

In the first acid extraction of benzocaine, the compound was dissolved in the organic solvent of dichloromethane. When the mixture was shaken with HCl, benzocaine’s amine group gained a proton and became more soluble in water than dichloromethane. This allowed the newly formed hydrochloric salt to migrate to the aqueous layer. However, the addition of NaOH to the acidic aqueous layer regenerated benzocaine by deprotonation, making it insoluble in the aqueous layer. The precipitation of an ionic salt was therefore recovered by vacuum filtration and had a tested melting point range of 85.1C-87.4C compared to 88C-90C, the literature melting point of benzocaine. The similarity in melting point ranges, but low percent yield of 30.37% proves that the extract was somewhat successful. Lower yields may be the result of spillage performed in the lab. In the second basic extraction, the organic layer now included benzoic acid and benzamide. When treated with NaOH to deprotonate benzoic acid, the newly formed sodium benzoate transitioned to the aqueous layer as a sodium salt. Benzoic acid is regenerated once again after the addition of HCl and became insoluble in the aqueous layer after protonation. Its precipitation was then filtered out for a 65.87% recovery. Compared to its literature melting point of 122.41C, the resulting 120.9C-123.5C melting range of the sample also supports the accuracy of the separation due to its similarities and high percent yield. In conclusion, the usage of base and acid liquid extraction was mostly successful in this experiment because it was able to efficiently and properly isolate the impure mixture into two separate components of benzocaine and benzoic acid. By performing the techniques of extraction and vacuum filtration, the similarities between literature and tested

4- chlorobenzoic acid which was the aqueous layer has a theoretical melting point of 240-243°C, the organic layer, 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol has a theoretical melting point of 68-71°C. During our experiment we were unable to collect any data for the organic

For this experiment, an organometallic reagent was used for the synthesis and isolation of benzoic acid. The Grignard reaction is the addition reaction of an organometallic reagent, which in this case was an organomagnesium reagent. An organometallic reagent is a carbon bonded to a metal. This reagent was combined with an electrophile, a carbonyl compound such as a ketone or aldehyde. Carbons are electrophilic when bound to a nonmetal thus the atoms are more electronegative than the carbon and metals are less electronegative than carbon.

The purpose of this experiment is to practice common organic laboratory techniques inside the lab to get one oriented to the basic methods of procedure that can be used for later experiments. This experiment involves the separation of benzoic acid from a more crude form, consisting of benzoic acid, methyl orange, a common acid/base indicator, and cellulose, a natural polymer of glucose (Huston, and Liu 17-24). The technique that is used to perform this separation is called extraction. Extraction is a systematic process of separating mixtures of compounds, taking advantage of the affinity differences of compounds to separate them (Padias 128-37). This technique recognizes the principle that “like dissolves in like,” that is,

The product obtained had a melting point of approximately 128-130 °C and a weight of .054 grams. The limiting reagent was calculated to be sodium borohydride. With the weight and limiting reagent, the percent yield was calculated to be approximately 53.33%. The IR of the product showed a peak at approximately 3311.25, which indicates the presence of an O-H bond.

1. Purpose: to clarify the mechanism for the cycloaddition reaction between benzonitrile oxide and an alkene, and to test the regiochemistry of the reaction between benzonitrile oxide and styrene.

The reduction of nitro compounds consists of a two step reaction in which m-nitroacetophenone was reduced to 3-aminoacetophenone using tin and the acid, hydrochloric acid, and 3-aminoacetophenone was reduced to 3-(1-hydroxyethylaniline) using sodium borohydride and ethanol as a solvent. The former reduction was performed with granular tin and concentrated hydrochloric acid, stopped with the addition of sodium hydroxide, and the product separated using gravity filtration. The latter reduction was performed with granular sodium borohydride and ethanol, stopped with the addition of hydrochloric acid and water, and separated using ether as a solvent in a separatory funnel. Both products were evaluated using NMR spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, thin-layer

There are four main regions of IR absorptions: region 4000 – 3000 cm-1 corresponds to N-H, C-H and O-H stretching, region 2250- 2100 cm-1 is triple-bond stretching , region 2000- 1500 cm-1 is double bonds and the region below 1500 cm-1 is the fingerprint region where a variety of single bonds are absorbed.3 The chromic acid test is a test for oxidizability and gives a positive result for primary and secondary alcohols as well as aldehydes2. A positive result in the chromic acid test is indicated by a color change and the formation of a precipitate. Tertiary alcohols give negative results for the chromic acid test since there must be a hydrogen present on the alcoholic carbon for oxidation to occur. The 2,4 DNP test, tests for a carbonyl and is therefore a dependable test for aldehydes and ketones. Finally, 13C NMR spectroscopy is a test to determine the structure of a compound. 13C NMR detects the 13C isotope of carbon. Each carbon has a different chemical shift. A carbon’s chemical shift is affected by the electronegativity of nearby atoms. Carbons that are bonded to highly electronegative atoms resonant downfield because the electronegative atom pulls electrons away from the nearby carbons and cause those carbons to resonant downfield1 (John McMurry, 2008). A general trend is that sp3-hybridized carbons absorb from 0 to 90 ppm, sp2-hybridized carbons resonant between 110

The fact that in both cases the experimentally determined melting point ranges were very similar to the expected melting point ranges indicates that the benzoic acid and benzocaine were purified quite

Abstract: This procedure demonstrates the nitration of methyl benzoate to prepare methyl m-nitrobenzoate. Methyl benzoate was treated with concentrated Nitric and Sulfuric acid to yield methyl m-nitrobenzoate. The product was then isolated and recrystallized using methanol. This reaction is an example of an electrophilic aromatic substitution reaction, in which the nitro group replaces a proton of the aromatic ring. Following recrystallization, melting point and infrared were used to identify and characterize the product of the reaction.

The IR data of spectrum 1 supports this answer. The spectrum shows the OH bond, which shows an enol form. Usually, the keto form is more favorable than the enol form, but because re-aromatization is more stable, the enol form is the more stable tautomer. The peak at 3.37 is significant of the starting material. The peak at 4.17 is significant of the product.

In this experiment, methyl benzoate was synthesized from benzoic acid and methanol with acid catalyze using Fisher Esterification. First benzoic acid and methanol were mixed in 100 mL round bottom flask. We cooled the mixture in ice and poured 3 mL of conc. H2SO4 and swirled to mix compounds. Then we refluxed the mixture for 1 hour. We let the solution cool and then decanted into a separatory funnel containing 50 mL of water and rinsed the round bottom flask with 35 mL of tert-butyl methyl ether and added that to a separatory funnel. We shook and vented thoroughly and drained the aqueous layer which contained a bulk of methanol and H2SO4. We washed the solution in the separatory funnel with 25 mL of water, followed by 25 mL of sat. sodium bicarbonate

Next, I observed my Proton NMR which had only one peak. The multiplicity is six. Therefore, I have six hydrogens. Using this information, I was able to conclude that my unknown is

Recrystallization was done to remove impurities from the sample. The percent recovery of benzoic acid during recrystallization is 23.02%. The difference between the pure and impure samples was observed by comparison of melting points. It was found that impure sample had a lower and wider melting point range of 120.1-122.2 (C). The pure sample melting point range was 121.3-122.5 (C). These ranges helped determine purity by comparing the known melting point of pure benzoic acid.