No Child Left Behind: My Philosophy Of Education

Good intentions are no excuse to continue a fail policy. Since the No Child left Behind Act (NCLB) became in effect, teachers have been restricted to teach in a certain way.

As far as learning for standardized testing goes there is a federal act involved that plays a role in the educational system and controls how the educational system teaches and tests these students. This act is named, The No Child Left Behind Act. This act makes standardized assessments mandatory for all fifty states. This law serves a purpose to test students in reading and math for grades three through eight. In high school, students are required to test and they are expected to meet or exceed state standards in reading and math. (Elementary and Secondary Education Act) “The major focus of No Child Left Behind is to close student achievement gaps by providing all children with a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education” (Elementary and Secondary Education Act). But since the early 2000s, has this act kept it promise or has the responsibility of this act been not meeting these standards? When this law was first placed, it was said that this act would make it possible for students in the United States to become proficient in math and reading by the year 2014. (National Council of Churches Committee on Public Education and Literacy) But, does this mean that every student in the U.S. will meet these expectations? The National Council of Churches Committee on Public Education and Literacy does not believe so. “The No Child Left Behind Act sets an impossibly high bar—that every single student will be proficient in reading and math by 2014. We

The idea of the no child left behind act also known as NCLB was establish and signed into law on January 8, 2002 by former president George W. Bush which was actually supported by both of the political parties. The entire role of the No Child Left Behind act was to ensure the focus of American students to the better idea of getting the American educational system back into the competitive field internationally seeing that in the year 2002 the United States of America was actually ranked number eighteen out of the entire twenty four nations. The No Child Left Behind law has mad a huge break through Americas entire educational system. The NCLB law has given a much greater deal of attention to the way things are being done in the classroom and how it prepared for the classroom which is a important factor in bring America as a country to a much high number in the list of education throughout the world.

How could the idea of No Child Left Behind Act and standardized testing become such a terrible problem, that it has led to a generation of students that are not properly educated and prepared for college and the “Real World”? My Working thesis is that standardized testing should be removed from the school system because it is not testing what children know but teaching them how to test.

The "No Child Left Behind Act" (Public Law 107-110, 115), is a Congressional Act signed into law by George W. Bush in January 2002. The Bill was a bi-partisan initiative, supported by Senator Edward Kennedy, and authorized a number of federal programs designed to improve standards for educational accountability across all States, districts, and increase the focus on reading. Much of the NCLB focus is based on the view that American students are falling behind in educational basis when scored are compared globally. The Act does not establish a national achievement standard; each State must confirm its own set of standards, but in order to receive funding, the States must meet a basic criterion of performance (Abernathy, 2007).

On January 8, 2002, George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act into law (also known as the NCLB). The No Child Left Behind Act was the latest reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, a federal education bill addressing the nation’s schools. At his signing ceremony, Bush stated, “There’s no greater challenge than to make sure that every child—and all of us on this stage mean every child, not just a few children—every single child, regardless of where they live, how they’re raised, the income level of their family, every child receive a first-class education in America.” Although his pledge became the hope for improved education reform, effects have only been negative and contradictory to what they have promised.

Through the years there have been many pushes for better education and each time new laws are implemented. Many of the old laws have been updated with improvements. These new laws are given a new name. The “No Child Left Behind” Act has given everyone a new approach to education while implementing many new stipulations and regulations.

Check out the issues and articles that strike your interest. You should go to the "Issue Guides" located at the upper left of the page… and click open a few issues of interest to you. Note the charts. Discuss one or more policy issues or articles found on this website. Try to be somewhat analytical/evaluative/critical. Talk to each other. Post websites for others to visit.

Education is a key contributor to personal development social and economic growth. It is obligatory for a person to be educated and trained effectively In order to achieve his or her ambition. Educators and trainers play a leading role in the making of future leaders and champions. Such are the principal aspects, which led to the rise of the "No Child Left Behind" program in 2002. The program, which focuses on teaching practices, is meant to enhance excellence in students attending all education centers giving no bias to nationality, gender, physical, or mental disability (Berkhart 84). The program, which has been running for at least 1 decade, benefits many learners due to its remarkable contribution to academic excellence and skill empowerment in relation to establishing a brighter future for the young generation.

Who are Raphael, Leonardo, Michelangelo and Donatello? Present this question to a room full of children (as well as teenagers) and you are only going to receive references to the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles as responses, nearly without a shred of doubt. Though those guys are great, as someone in my mid-twenties I have some nostalgic attachment to them as well, this fictional presentation, with its’ fictional responses which is actually not related to those fictional characters at all, presents a prime example of the large void in the level of insight of what the education system has instilled in our youths. At the turn of the century, there seemed to be a shift. And that shift is due, in part, to the introduction of the No Child Left Behind Act, a federal public education act that forces schools to follow certain policies and meets standards in order to receive federal funding. It is believed by many that No Child Left Behind has assisted in the marginalization of arts education in public schools by way of prioritizing core subjects. This thinking, and by conjecture this act, have been a detriment to the development of children. Therefore, I propose that if this act is to be in place, in order for public schools to provide the best possible education for the future of this country, they must also implement benchmark testing for fine arts classes identical to those of the core subjects.

The No Child Left behind Act was implemented in 2002. Since then, the achievement gap has decreased in some areas. Test scores have increased for some students. Struggling schools have received extra help and more resources to raise student achievement. Students have also been offered wrap-around services, such as free tutoring to address learning deficits. Furthermore, the No Child Left Behind Act has had many failures as well. The NCLB was supposed to increase students’ performance academically and all students were expected to perform at the proficiency level by 2013-2014. Most states have failed to meet 100 percent of that requirement. I’ve recently seen the scores from the Milestone Test from last year, most of the students that I am

We, as a country, have some of the lowest scoring in international tests in reading, math, and science when compared to several other countries. In order to improve education in America, we have to go to the root of our problem in the school system and find better ways to enforce new rules and regulations that wouldn’t be detrimental to both students, schools, and educators alike. The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act is having a negative effect on our education system because it reduces the choices of schools for parents, and the distribution of qualified teachers. It also has a negative impact on the amount that kids are able to learn in school.

I was reading your post and I thought that a formative assessment can allow you to modify your curriculum to enable you to determine if you need to differentiate learning with students. The No Child Left Behind law requires us to know how to analyze, interpret and use data to teach students more effectively, but I believe that with a strong principal who has a clear vision and expects his teacher to assist in meeting those goals, needs to communicate with his teachers by learning how his teachers are teaching a certain curriculum. The teacher or the principal cannot meet these goals alone, but need each other, so a principal must be involved. The goal is for the student to have a mastery or understanding of any concepts or processes, so

During the 2011-2012 school year, United States public high schools hit an all-time high by having an average four-year graduation rate of 80 percent (“State High School Graduation Rates by Race, Ethnicity”). These rates vary by state and Nebraska ranks in at about 88 percent, which is above national average. According to the No Child Left Behind Act, issued by President George W. Bush and signed into law in 2002, by the year 2014 all students who had completed their eighth grade year should have been proficient in academic skills. For many years, schools were just shuffling kids through the system without giving them the proper education they need to succeed later in life. Unfortunately, this act has not been effective and did not give

What I know before doing my research paper on No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act is that president Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965 passed the law before George W. Buch resigned on January 8th, 2002. It was emphases, by increasing funds for poor school districts with higher achievement on low- income students. During this NCLB act there was a debate on whether states should maintain them standardize and tests. Another thing is that whether schools would be held accountable whether by National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP). Should schools change the curriculum that is important in today’s word? Why or why not? Would you let your children be in a classroom that is not have a degree in teachings? All over the states have been dealing with