No Hope For Mankind In Lord Of The Flies By William Golding

529 Words3 Pages
No Hope for Mankind A group of boys stranded on an island are debating which leader to follow: the leader with food, or the leader with fire and shelter. Tough as it already is, the boys must make their decision quickly, or else they will be left with neither. Food is necessary for survival because without it, people cease to exist. When food is scarce and in selfish hands, it can lead to troublesome situations such as physical fighting. Through the articles by Coskren, Baker, and Niemeyer, and Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies, mankind is given no hope as pessimism is strongly portrayed by the boys’ violent actions. Throughout the novel, the boy’s violent actions portray Golding’s sense of pessimism. For example, during the attack on Simon, “the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore” (Golding 153). When…show more content…
Coskren states, he “presents human nature as infected with the romantic chimera of inevitable human progress”, meaning that Golding does not believe humans will improve for the better (275). Golding’s beliefs greatly influence his novel in the sense that he uses his writing to show his point that humans are born naturally evil. Another idea is a comment made by Baker, who says, “we are defeated with monotonous regularity by our own irrationality” (XV). Our irrationality further emphasizes Golding’s point about how it is hard to be good when left for civilization and we cannot change natural instinct. Finally, Golding takes violence seriously because he emphasizes physical cruelty performed by the boys, while Ballantyne’s description of brutality in his novel are introduced merely for sensational effect (Niemeyer 240). The sharp contrast between Ballantyne and Golding’s descriptions show that while Ballantyne thinks boys will not be violent, Golding does. His disbelief in the goodness of humans leads him to instead believe in the evilness of
Get Access