No Parole : Should Not Be Granted Parole?

Every jurisdiction in the United States has a paroling authority. The paroling authority is also known as a correctional agency that has statutory authority to grant parole, set conditions of parole, supervise parolees, revoke parole, and discharge from parole. Additionally, the parole board members accustomed to relying on experience and an intuition in parole rulings must now take computerized inmate risk assessments and personality tests into account. The two major models are parole boards and discretionary release.

I agree that rehabilitation should be the primary goal in sentencing. Rehabilitation teaches a criminal how to interact with the community after being away for a set amount of time. Days in prison and jail can hinder the positive thoughts in one’s mind. Anger and depression can build up, and make the criminals want to act out again. The rehabilitation process can even mend burnt bridges with family and friends.

A client tells you that her boss is treating her unfairly at work because of her criminal record and probation or parole status. Your client is afraid of being fired and having her probation or parole revoked. What do you do?

On August 6, 1969, a megalomaniac named Charles Manson ordered his “Family” to kill everyone in a house that used to be owned by a well known music recorder named Terry Melcher. However, Malcher was not occupying the house but instead the house was occupied by a renowned movie producer, Roman Polanski, and his wife, actress Sharon Tate. On that date, Manson’s family perpetrated one of the most gruesome crime in Hollywood’s history by stabbing to death Sharon Tate and her friends. The case that ensued after the murder became one of the most publicised murder trial in the history of crime.

[In an effort to reduce crime rates over the last two decades, there was a push to increase arrests, and length of incarceration of criminal offenders. Due to the increase in numbers of offenders incarcerated and the length of their sentences the prison has an increasing population of elderly offenders. In light of this situation, the need to provide medical care for this population has become increasingly more expensive than anyone anticipated. Therefore, there has been a great deal of attention to what is known as compassionate release. In order to evaluate the arguments for and against this legislation we will look at the arguments on both sides, what values underlie each position, how medical release fits into the discussion, and alternatives to the problem.

While some critics regard parole as an early release option that puts the public at unnecessary risk, there are others that argue that parole allows the re-integration of offenders into the community and provides better prospects for their rehabilitation. There are however, several questions that need to be answered in order to figure out which of these two arguments makes more sense. This includes, how is parole defined and described in the academic field? What are the pros and cons of using parole as an early release option? How do we determine if parole is over or under-used in Australia?

Prisoners should be granted privileges depending on the type of crime they committed. There’s different types of felonies that determine how long a prisoner is going to stay in prison. Violent crimes such as rape, armed robbery, and murder are most likely to get life sentences . Most prisoners have about the same amount of rights. There’s those prisoners who committed non-violent felonies/crimes but are serving life sentences. Prisoners who committed non-violent felonies; does not involve high levels of damage or serious injury, should have more rights than someone who killed people, betrayed the nation or raped people.

The reason for wanting parole to be abolished in the early 1900’s was because society as a whole did not feel that prisons and the parole system did not rehabilitate offenders enough to reduce recidivism (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2015). Many felt that prisoners that did not deserve to be paroled were being released because of a corrupt and inadequate system. The members of the parole board as well as the parole officers were not trained enough to make the decision to release prisoners early as well as supervise them once they were released. Today, many of the states have abolished discretionary parole for several reasons. The first reason is that indeterminate sentencing and discretionary parole did not accomplish prisoner rehabilitation

Arguments for discretionary release are that it is an important part of the criminal justice structure. It works to keep the public safe by keeping inmates incarcerated longer.(Schmalleger & Gmykla, 2015). It also specially selects which inmates are being released so that they do not contribute to the dangers in society. They also receive the necessary structure to be re-introduced into society. Arguments for mandatory release include that it allows a person to be released early if they are not a danger to society or the community. (Dearinger, 2011).They are under specific requirements of travel and associations, they have a curfew and cannot have any contacts with the victims. They also cannot have any contact with witnesses in their case

A murderer is normally defined by the psychological attributes that define him or her. These killers often suffer from a psychotic delusion that forces them to commit their horrific crimes. However, those who are pronounced sane and rational have a moral conviction that drives them to kill. It is this principle that separates the average murder from the psychotic sadists that believes in what he or she does. Charles Manson, leader of the Manson Family, believed in the apocalyptic war of Helter Skelter, the uprising of blacks and the mass genocide of whites (Whitehead). Manson’s firm conviction about Helter Skelter separates him from other criminals who commit their crimes out of insanity. In Travels in New-England and New-York, author

No, I do not believe that we should continue to use parole because parole is just like a slap on the wrist. 80 percent of prisoners are rearrested shortly after their release so why continue to use this method? I don’t believe that everyone inmate has the legal right to parole especially violent offenders or those who continuously return to prison. If there is a previous background of reoccurring offending they should not have this privilege. However, I do believe that if an inmate feels that a parole decision was unfair, we should provide them with a judicial hearing to review this decision to make sure that the final decision is accurate and no mistakes were made. And if the prisoner feels that it is unfair, another opinion would help reinstate

As one of the strangers begin to axe through the front door, the threshold is literally destroyed. Insecurity floods the house as James and Kristen hide in a cupboard. As they hide, the friend that James called to pick him up arrives, as a record begins to play in the background. Predominant lyrics of this record is the phrase "life without parole". The use of this song demonstrates how the inhabitants are imprisoned within their own home with no chance of escape. The walls of there home turn against them, changing from protection from the outside to locking them on the inside. Just as prisons themselves were hidden from public view (Fiddler, 2007), the inhabitants of this prison like space are also hidden from public, unable to get help. This

The concept of probation provides the offender with the opportunity of community release as long as he/she obeys the laws and the conditions of his/her probation. Most probations involve a contract between the court and the offender in which a prison or jail term is suspended and the probationer promises to obey a set of probation rules, or conditions mandated by the court. When granting probation, the court sets down certain conditions or rules of behavior that the probationer has to abide by. If the rules are violated, or if the probationer commits another criminal offense, probation may be revoked. Probationary sentences may be granted by state and federal district courts but the presiding judge makes the final decision. More than half of

When you hear the name Charles Manson, you think of one the wickedest man to ever walk the face of the earth. His name is well known in the hearts of America; not in a positive way. More in a heartbreaking and terrified way. Manson’s childhood, his behavior, his ability to control and manipulate people the way he did is something no one could understand. He organized a cult like family and constructed them to do brutal things to several people. Here is one question for the brain, is Charles Manson a killer? Did he use his looks to prey on young innocent girls to do his dirty work?

There are approximately 2500 people in the United States serving life without parole who were sentenced before the age of eighteen (SENTENCING PROJECT). Life without parole for juveniles is highly controversial for many reasons. Some people believe that the crime itself is more important in sentencing than the age of the criminal, while other believe the sentence is overly harsh and unfair. Life without parole is not a fair sentencing for adolescents. The maximum sentence should be life with possibility of parole. This is because many people serving life without parole that were sentenced as juveniles did not commit homicide, adolescent brains are not yet fully developed, and the cost of keeping these prisoners incarcerated for so many years is a waste of taxpayer money.