No Pass No Drive Law

This statistic proves how not many students are doing as good, considering the majority of them scored “below basics”. However, if we were to pass the policy then the score would most likely rise because students would be working harder in school and doing what they need to do. It could possibly give the student a better comprehension level and decision making level, so when they do begin driving the people around them along with themselves will be safer.

A student with a driver’s license has a right to drive to school and form school.

The article has no statistical evidence to support the ideas they provided. They also offer no statistics on how the revoking of a student’s license has made a positive impact on a student’s academic life. Therefore, I think taking away a student’s privilege to drive is unfair and would have minimal effect on improving their academic

Imagine not being able to go to school. Your parents are mad and you feel horrible. Suddenly the police take your driver's license away and you can't drive to school or to work. The No Pass/No Drive law Has been implemented in over 27 States and has affected many lives. This law takes away people's licenses if they don't do well in school or don’t go to school. The goal of this law is to motivate students to go to school more often or to motivate students to study.California should not pass the No Pass/No Drive law because if they do it will hurt lives of students who depend on their car to drive to work or school.

Many people drive without a license and this is not safe for them. To protect the community, all countries should allow illegal immigrants to get driver license, so that all drivers are protected on the road. Having a driver’s license is vital to daily life, especially when people drive on the road. More driver license on the road could help safe more people and less accident. According to Marina Riker of the Hawaii post, “Unlicensed drivers are almost five times more likely to be in a fatal crash than are validly licensed drivers” ( Marina 2015). People who do not have a driver license, do not learn how to drive like people who pass their driver's test. Unlicensed drivers are more dangerous than people who hold their driver license because whenever they hit another person car it is hard look for their information and which insurance company they have. For safety, government should let illegal immigrants have a driver's license so crashing on the

Should we enforce a No Pass, No Drive law? I believe we should not enforce this law in the state of Wypoming.

Parents can instruct their teens to pick up things from the store, pick up food for the family on the way home, or even run errands for them, which not only saves time for everybody, but also exposes teens to adult everyday tasks necessary for a successful future. Teenagers need this maturity before they enter the real world, and if you are required to graduate high school before getting the opportunity to take these steps to being more mature, then you’re already in the adult world without having many vital experiences brought to you through driving. Not allowing any students to be able to drive creates a larger problem for schools as well as parents. In this situation parents would either be required to drive their students to and from school every morning and afternoon, altering their normal schedules, or the school district would be obligated to provide double, if not more, the free transportation that they already

Students who gain a high school diploma shouldn’t be the only ones granted a driver’s license. The ability to drive and the ability to gain a high school diploma are two different things that do not relate and have no correlation whatsoever. I believe that it is unjust to grant a driver’s license only to those students because there are many factors that can potentially affect a student from gaining their high school diploma, such as family issues, financial situations, and mental or physical health. Receiving an education is a privilege. Unfortunately, even in Canada - one of the most developed countries in the world, 1 in 5 children live under the poverty line. Approximately 1.3 million children are living on very little financial support. (NEWS 1130, 2015) These children may have to

If I were a member of the West Virginia state legislature, I would have voted against the law prohibiting dropouts younger than eighteen to obtain their driver's license. I believe that there are numerous reasons why it is necessary for teens under the age of eighteen to drive. For instance, many teens start their first job around the age of sixteen, which is also the minimum age required for a provisional driver’s license. However if the teen dropped out of high school, they would not be able to apply for the license making it harder, or even impossible, for them to work at their given hours. The law is believed to prevent students from dropping out, yet it isn’t 100% effective for those who don’t feel school is for them and would rather work

Reason one why sixteen year olds should be allowed to drive is because in passage 1 it says,¨ Turning 16 and getting a driver's license is a rite of passage that most teens have worked hard to earn.¨ This shows that teens work hard to get their driver's license because it's like a milestone like when a baby bird finally leaves their mothers nest. It's kinda like that for teenages getting their license because they had worked so hard to get it. So too just take that away and make then wait another year or two just because some teens like to cause trouble does not seen very fair.

This year the dropping rate for Bakersfield is of 14 percent; however kern county has the highest dropping rates. It has become a major problem and we need to come out with a efficient solution. I agree that we should come with a similar law that will help getting more truant students to attend school.

I was one of the first students in my class and the first child in my family to obtain a driver’s license. Driving home from the DMV alone, away from the watchful eye of a licensed California driver at least 25 years of age, was a liberating feeling. Like generations of adolescents receiving their licenses for the first time, my smile was from ear to ear. But, along with this privilege came a responsibility that I had

At the end of junior year in high school, many students try to get their driver licenses and their own cars. According to California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), the age requirement for having driver license is at least sixteen years old. If people are under eighteen, they need to get their parents' permissions in order to apply for provisional driver license. Provisional drivers cannot drive alone. They must drive with a licensed parent or other passengers who are above twenty-five. They are not allowed to use cars from 11 p.m to 5 a.m for the first twelve months when they get their driver licenses. Additionally, people under twenty cannot be transported by provisional drivers. Allowing driving at the age of sixteen can be benefited

Although this may seem like a good or responsible rule it may cause havoc with today's youth, especially the teenagers. With this rule it may cause rebellious teens and/or young adults to break this rule, basically setting them up for consequences from breaking the rule. Also teenagers are able to get their driving permit at 15 and their driver's license by 16, meaning

One of the limitations put in place for young drivers is not being able to carry passengers without an adult in the car. This can be really annoying for drivers who want to be with their friends, but this law is a necessity. According to an article from the California DMV, teen drivers are 3.6 times more likely to be in a fatal crash when carrying passengers vs driving alone. That is an astonishing difference. Think about this. Every time you drive with a friend in the car, your risk of death is tripled. I don't like those odds. Even if this law is a nuisance to some teens, it prevents many fatal crashes and is definitely very beneficial for all parties. After all, this law only affects teens in the first six months after receiving their license. Six months is not a long time to wait, so I don't see why anybody would complain about this regulation. This law is definitely needed,