No Restrictions Should Not Be Allowed At Any Facilities Allegedly Performing Violations For Reasons For Conducting Assessments?

DISCLOSURE NOTICE - This information is furnished upon the condition that it will not be released to another nation without the specific authority

Legislation to Authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to Accept, as Part of a Settlement, Diesel Emission Reduction Supplemental Environmental Projects : Report (to Accompany S. 2146)." (2008): 1-4. UWSP Library Forward. Web. 01 Jan. 2012.

Government restrictions should be required during a crisis. One reason is that government restrictions gave the colonists multiple reasons to break away from Britain. The first point is that Britain enforced extremely high taxes on common goods, such as tea and sugar, which were staples to the colonists' diet. The colonists were upset about not being represented in Parliament, even though they were technically British citizens. They thought that since they were being taxed on goods, they should be represented in Parliament. Britain ignored their request, and this then ignited the colonists' inner fire to finally fight back. Secondly, Britain began to decline trial by jury to the colonists by using guilty by Parliament. (Head, T., 2015). Britain could declare anyone as guilty, thus subjecting them to the confiscation of their property, imprisonment, or even execution. (Head, T., 2015).

against an EPA compliance order until the case was brought to the US district court first, then

When watching the film, “acres of skin” I was honestly horrified on what was going on at that time period in prisons. Prison testing should have been illegal because they were not properly informing the inmates on what they were particularly volunteering for. The inmates just knew if they volunteered for this experiment than they would receive money. Money was and still is a huge deal in the prison system. Homlsburg Prison had a population made up of poor semi-literate inmates. Most the inmates were honestly just looking to make money so that they could survive in the system. The men were desperate to earn some form of money because doing these experiments offered more money than actually working for the prison. Which I believe is honestly sickening because if inmates were properly informed of information and were able to make an educated decision. Inmates did not know what the long-term health effects of these experiments could lead to. Some of the late-term health effects to some of these experiments were anything from losing teeth to cancers.

Did you know EPA has a federal criminal Investigation division with a 90% conviction rate? (About EPA). Surprisingly not that many people know what EPA stands for or what they do. The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Also known as the EPA was established in July 1970 by congress in response of the growing demand by the public for cleaner water, air, and land. By

In the 1970’s there was growing confusion regarding environmental policy due to certain states creating environmental protection laws which were largely ineffective. To ease confusion, fix national guidelines, and monitor and enforce them President Richard Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA functions under three federal departments: the Interior, Agriculture, and Health, Education and Welfare departments. The original role of the EPA was to administrate the Clean Air Act which was enacted to reduce the air pollution caused by vehicles and industry. The EPA has since grown to enforce at least 12 major statutes such as: ocean dumping laws, safe drinking water, insecticides, and asbestos hazards in

The Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011, otherwise referred to as H.R. 347. , is a federal law in the United States allowing the Secret Service more power in regarding enforcement of the law in arrests and suppression of protesting in situations demonstrating trespassing on restricted locations and deliberately creating problems that interrupt government functions. This law makes it possible to get up to 10 years in jail for anybody who goes in or conspires to go in a government building, grounds or in the proximity that is restricted by government whether the person on the grounds is aware they are in a government restricted area. It basically gives the government officials more power to stop people from being

In the United States, These past few years have been rocky with the Environmental Protection Agency otherwise known as the EPA. The “rockiness” stems from multiple factors, particularly surrounding around President Donald Trump’s bias towards business over the protection of the environment.

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act requires the EPA to develop standards specifically for the Yucca Mt. Site. Those standards are "designed to protect the public and environment from

an ICI at least one Certificate of Conformity from the EPA must be obtained. Due to ICIs, many

It was obvious that there were strong ties to the responsible party of the Marzone site, which was Chevron. The EPA became dependent on Chevron for funding on cleaning up the Marzone site which was some of the reason in avoiding the residential soil testing on the site, and ignoring the needs of the Tifton community. PWP made strong request for assistance from the Agency for the Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (ATSDR) on the Marzone site, which was a great step forward in urging the EPA to do testing of their own, but unfortunately, not much came out of it, because the EPA refused help. The EPA needed to readjust how it went about dealing with the Tifton community on an environmental justice level, which was not seen during this case. They showed little to no regard for the Tifton community in the neglect they received for request to test the soils for dioxin contamination. This leads to training on how EPA officials and ATSDR officials dealing with Superfund sites need more training on environmental justice. The Executive Order unfortunately, has not done much to change this culture of neglect from the EPA and other federal agencies like it. The current laws like the Executive Order 12898 and the EPA’s own laws on dioxin contamination levels are already in place, but the fact that the EPA worked so

As known by all, the United States Environmental Protection Agency was created for the purpose of protecting the health of the environment and all organisms residing within it, including humans, by composing and enforcing regulations based on laws passed by the United States government. The EPA has taken a variety of steps in order to ensure the safety of all who reside within the Unites States, such as amending the Clean Air Act, banning the use of the cancer-causing pesticide DDT, and limiting industrial discharges of pollution into waterways. The people could not thank you all enough for your service and aid towards the environment and its people. However, it is due to recent events that this letter is being sent to the agency, in hopes

EPA, in consultation with the LDEQ, may modify the Preferred Alternative or select another response action presented in this Plan, based on new information or public comments. Therefore, the public is encouraged to review and comment on all the alternatives presented in this Proposed Plan. Once EPA has evaluated all the comments and consulted with the LDEQ, it will issue a Record of Decision (ROD) to document the selection of the remedy for the Site. The ROD will include EPA’s response to comments submitted during the public comment

In August, presiding U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth issued an opinion stating the EPA’s “failure to deny the allegations that personal accounts were being used to conduct official business leaves open the possibility that they were.” Accompanying the opinion was an order permitting Landmark to conduct discovery limited to the following issues: whether and to what extent the EPA administrator, deputy administrator and/or chief of staff utilized personal e-mail accounts to conduct official business during the relevant time periods and whether the EPA intentionally excluded those personnel from the FOIA request response.