No Stipend for College Athletes Essay examples

Many believe that college athletes should not be paid. The main debate against compensating college athletes is that they are at the university for educational purposes and playing sports is a benefit. The NCAA states, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (McCauley 10). Universities get all the financial benefits of the money earned from sports played from things such as team jerseys, sports passes and tickets, etc. Many argue that it is only fair to give a portion of the profit to the players that earned the money. It is very important when arguing for or against paying college athletes to not take into fairness, but to hold

The main question, however, is what creative implement would there be on how money between athletes are distributed. Another argument against players being paid are the numerous unknowns. Although there is a lot of talk on this issue, the basics of this entire plan on paying players are still unknown. Considering the money schools make from sales, they would probably manage the pay, but how would they distribute pay? Would it be based off ticket sales and merchandise? If so, football and basketball players would get almost all the pay, but what about the other sports?

Individuals that debate who approval of paying them say the students could collect a minor share of the profits. Yes, pay would vary, similar to the universities with the more popular teams that acquire more television time or money than those with fewer successful teams. College football as well as men’s basketball programs receives far more than any other athletic program. So these athletes would likely earn more as well. This may not be considered fair pay, but many of those who argue in support of paying college players point out that team popularity and consumers generally determine what is fair. These sports also tend to support other less popular sports that do not bring in loads of money on their own.

In a way, they are getting paid by receiving a college education that will help them a lot later in life because let’s face it, very few will go on to play at the pro level. Of the over 1 million high school football players, only about 6.9% will go on to play at the college level and then only about 2% of college

One of the biggest controversies going on in America, especially within sports, is whether college athletes should or should not be paid. As it stands now, college athletes are not being paid with actual money. Instead, they are rewarded with athletic scholarships. NCAA and colleges believe that their athletes should not be paid due to their amateur status. However, college athletes should be paid because they don’t have time to get jobs, they may lose their scholarship, and they make a lot of money for their school.

The topic of paying college athletes has been talked about for a few years now. A survey in 2013 shows that about 31% of the general public agree that college players should be played(Martinz, Madisen. “Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid? Both Sides of the Debate. ”CollegeXpress), They argue that these players work really hard while trying to maintain their grades, and are bringing in millions for their universities.

If college athletes were to start being paid, many questions would start to surface. The big question that would pop up first is, “What sports get paid?” Statistics show that football and basketball are the major revenue sports that actually make money for their universities, while most other college sports do not. While football brings in on average the most revenue, basketball is close to second. Another question that may be asked is, “How will the money be split?” Like many others, the writer believes that the biggest question lies in which areas of competition would get paid. Famous Fab Five member Jalen Rose states that, “Every student athlete should be paid $2000 a year” (Salvador). However, if you do that, in fairness, would one pay a star football player and a star rowing team member the same amount of money? Or would a woman athlete get paid just as much as a male athlete? If this not the case then it becomes extremely unfair and would just cause controversy. Fairness is important when coming to this, especially the fairness between females and males. There are several different questions that need to be reviewed and that proves why college athletes should not be paid. It would cause absolute chaos and a plethora

Only 2% are drafted into the NFL for instance, while the other 98% are getting a $200,000 education for free. There are eighty scholarship players on each of the 112 Division 1-A teams. This costs a university $16,000,000 to pay for an entire roster over four years (1 “College Athletes Shouldn’t Be Paid”). With all of that money being thrown around, it would be difficult for a college to determine which athlete gets paid how much, and if one sport deserves to get paid more than another.

Universities would not get financially hurt if they would decide to pay players just a little. The average Division One School profits around $6 million per year only on football and basketball. Universities like University of Florida or University of Michigan have profits of more than $10 million per year on all their

Kids grow up loving to play sports in their free time. They never get paid to play when they are at a young age. They do it for the love of the game and for the need for competition. This is the way that it is in college right now. College athletes compete with all their hearts to be the best they can for their schools. They don’t get paid a cent. It has been a common debate if that is the right way to do it. Should it be that college athletes do not deserve to get paid for playing a sport? It should not be this way. College athletes certainly should get paid to play.

College athletics have gained immense popularity among Americans over the past few decades. This has resulted into increased revenues for the(NCAA) and the participating colleges which has fuelled the debate of whether college athletes should be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. College athletes should be paid because they spend more time doing that than anything else. It 's kinda like having a full time job.Athletes form the basic unit of intercollegiate sports. Despite the success of NCAA tournaments, athletes do not receive any monetary compensation.

Have you paid attention to all of the news that has been surfacing about collegiate sports lately? It is a big topic now days in the world of sports on weather college athletes should be getting paid to play sports. College athletics have gained great popularity of the past few decades, and have brought schools lots of revenue. A lot of college athletes think they should be getting paid for their services they do for their school. College sports like basketball and football generate over six billion dollars a year, but none of it goes to the athletes. Athletes should be paid for all of the time and dedication they put forth to their sport and the effort they put towards school to be eligible to play, athletes should get paid for all the money they bring to their school by playing sports, and players should also be paid for putting their bodies on the line while playing sports.

The NCAA’s greatest fear about paying student athletes is the money itself. They worry it will be spread thin between all the sports departments, but with all the money circulating around the college sports industry, they should not have any concerns. The two most popular college sports, football and men’s basketball, generate over $6 billion in annual revenue combined; more than the amount the National

College athletes are finally getting attention on the fact that they are not paid. I believe that whether or not it is college or pro sports they deserve a salary. These players put their heart and soul on the field and get nothing in return. In the articles “Athletes New Day” by Paul Marx and “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid” by Warren Hartenstine, the reasons for college athletes to be paid are very evident. No matter the case, if the students move on to pro sports or not after college, they should be entitled to some pay for their contributions. College athletes deserve to be compensated for their playtime in these sports, sales of products with their name on it, and even compensation for their injuries.

Frequently, colleges are better known for their athletics than academics. Universities thrive off their athletic programs and in return, most reward their athletes through scholarships, apparel, and experiences. However, some believe that these rewards are not sufficient and that college athletes should be paid a salary. College athletes should not be paid a salary because many are receiving scholarships, it would create an unequal playing field, and it would take away the student aspect of being a collegiate athlete.