Noble Street High School Essay

Consequences have to be set for those students that get involved in bad behaviors. As leaders this take a lot of creative thinking to where students can really learn from their mistakes, this helps the students make the decision that they don’t want to do them anymore. Constant OSS days doesn’t affect students nowadays, so coming up with a program for the constant offenders to help them get back focused on what is important.

Out of school suspensions (OSS) are often enforced with the assumption that students receiving the suspension are less likely to repeat the problem behavior in the future. However, this has been proven to be false. Suspending a student for engaging in a certain behavior does not in fact serve as a deterrent from the behavior but as a deterrent from attending school instead. In actuality, receiving just a single suspension can increase the probability of a student experiencing academic failure, school dropout, and involvement in the juvenile justice system. Knowing this, some educators still believe that for many students, suspension can serve as an effective lesson. One of the greatest concerns that educators and administrators face is the matter of classroom management. It is part of their job to ensure a safe, productive and supportive classroom allowing students to learn and grow to their greatest potential. Though there are several strategies gauged towards managing a classroom, the most severe offences often lead to either in or out of school suspension. Some of the largest concerns faced with out of school suspensions is that they are often ineptly applied, used unfairly against students of color and seemingly ineffective at producing better behavior. Also known as exclusionary discipline, the majority of offenses that led to OSS have not been centered around violence but instead emphasised issues of classroom insubordination and defiance. In some rather extreme cases

Oakland fell into the Alternative Education Law program. Students worked at their own pace and speed to complete school. Oakland High School generally graduated between 15-20 students a year. Several smaller programs existed within the school, such as Region 5, or ALC (Alternative Learning Center) program or Lincoln Tree Farm. Region 5 were for student who were in transition from just being released from either Echo Glenn or Green hill youth jail facilities. They worked with a JRA representatives and would complete school work and prepare to reenter the comprehensive high school setting. They would have no contact with the remainder of the building and programs. This program ended during the 2007-2008 school year.

Another positive punishment observed on with 5th-grade general education class where a rude student is made to write an apology; the letter must

The school employs a number of sanctions to enforce school rules and to ensure a safe and positive learning environment.   We employ each sanction appropriately to each individual situation.

Students all have their own personalities, which affects their actions within the classroom. Many times, a students’ behavior is caused by outside factors causing them to act out with disruptive behaviors and disciplinary issues. During these times, a teacher must have a behavior management approach to deter similar behaviors in the future. Many first time teachers are unable to handle dealing with the behaviors and leave their jobs making it all the more important to come up with an effective behavior management approach to curtail those worrisome behaviors before it gets to that point (Sugai, 2009). In an effort to thoroughly discuss an efficient behavior management approach, a common disciplinary problem within classroom and the foundation of the issue will be considered. A combination of approaches may be to needed to stop behavioral issues, such as providing motivation and establishing rules and procedures in a clear way will deter behavioral issues. Finally, an in-depth look at the steps needed in order to implement the approach into the classroom.

I. Purpose for this investigation is to pin-point problems within the Roanoke branch of Phoenix Advertising which have led to the recent resignations of an art director and an account executive, increasing client complaints about quality of work, productivity and demoralization of employees within that branch.

Another policy which could fix the current punishment policies in schools is the Restorative Justice system which focuses on improving the student-teacher relationship and the overall classroom environment because this would help keep the students content and safe. When a student is satisfied with the environment of the classroom, they will be more willing to be involved and engaged in classroom activities. This is why, Teasley feels it is important to focus on restoring the mutual respect in schools and have students take responsibility for their actions (Teasley). When a student has a respectable relationship with their instructor, or any adult figure for that matter, they will be more inclined to be obedient. They will also be more willing to learn and to be more affable to their superiors.

Those of you that have been to school probably remember having to follow the rules or else you would have to face the wrath of the discipline policy. While it is true that the discipline policy that is used in Noble schools is effective, I believe that the discipline policy that should be used at K.M.S. is the policy used at Urban Prep Academies which reward students for good behavior instead of punishing them for misbehavior. The reason I choose this discipline policy is because the other discipline plan hurts low-income families, the other discipline plan is too harsh, and this policy is more productive.

Look into a classroom and one would see that collective punishment has long been used to elicit good behavior from students, but it is time for a closer look. Using tactics of peer pressure to try to enforce rules on surrounding students does not tend to work. Teachers who use collective punishment usually find more resentment from their students rather than the good behavior they are looking for, which begs the question, why do we still think of collective punishment as an effective way to make people conform? Using collective punishment goes against equality between students, and the equity of the classroom. Schools should not enforce collective punishment as a technique to correct behavior, since it can be harmful to innocent students, is ineffective at correcting behavior long-term, and can help instruct students to manipulate others with peer pressure.

As Pedro A. Noguera mentions in “Schools, Prisons and Social Implications of Punishment: Rethinking Disciplinary Practices,” teachers tend to do what is best for the school and not what is best for the student. Even though it may not be always the main reason, in many cases it is. Noguera compare the way schools manage “bad students” with how we approach crime in society, by “removing ‘bad’ individuals and keeping them away from others who are presumed to be ‘good’.” Noguera also mentions that, students who get in trouble more often than

Some students are also high risks in becoming a criminal due to lack of sociability to others. They think that everyone will punished them and embarrassment them to all. Students who violated the policies also denial their self esteem due to improper scolded by their teachers. They also tend to have no discipline among people who are higher than them.

First of all the punishments were pointless. Some people might think “ well obviously they had a point to them otherwise why they would they do it?” But I realized that not many people know why, but that is misleading because someone might think that they are only being good teachers because they give consequences for the things they did wrong. But here is they they were punished for pointless things, including the fact that they would get punished for not getting up in time to clean the bathrooms. Like this quote from Iyotte a supervisor from Sherman, a school that was interviewed by the writer of NPR.com : ’"They get demerits if they're not up by 6," Iyotte says. Students get more demerits if they are not up by 6:15 a.m. and even more if

This paper explores six basic principles of effective punishment in which are most relevant for consideration when using procedures that may function as punishment to change any child's given behavior and if these factors influence whether a given contingency functions as a Punisher.

In public schools, there is a lack of tolerance regarding such behavior of a non-disciplined student. For example, if the student does not follow the rules or purposely misbehaves, the student will receive automatic consequences instead of a high toleration policy. This is because they go by a specific standard and expectation for all students. The students must follow this procedure in order to meet such expectations by the school. If the student does not adjust to these expectations, automatic consequences such as in-school suspension, out of school suspension, prohibited free time, lack of freedom, or even expulsion. These are the requirements for agreeing to join a public school system.