preview

Non Adhesive Tape

Decent Essays
Open Document

Capasso et al (1989) made a comparison of adhesive and non-adhesive tape when applied to the ankle. The authors determined that non-adhesive tape must be exchanged every three days due to loss of compression, and also confirmed that adhesive tape could be left on for five days. In this study, the forces were measured by merging a sphygmomanometer with the ankle taping. However, such method did not reveal an exact measurement and thus it was criticized. The subjects were instructed to heel strike, foot weight bear and toe-off weight bear while the data was collected in between phases as they held the position. This mechanical function did not reflect a real time gait cycle and therefore it was an inaccurate representation to gait. Furthermore, …show more content…

50 subjects were divided into two groups: one group was given an Aircast ankle brace and the other only a supportive elastic tape. The subjects were evaluated at 10 days and then again 1 month after treatment. Both bracing and taping groups presented major progress in their results (p=0.028 and p=0.014 respectively of the Karlson score). Out of the 17 taping subjects, 6 dropped out which showed a poor compliance to ankle taping. Callaghan (1997) reinforced this reflection in their literature review by making a comparison of both ankle taping and bracing in the athlete. They stated that taping may be awkward and uncomfortable to the subject rather than a brace. Nonetheless, both Boyce et al (2005) and Capasso et al (1989) employed numerous evaluators to tape the subjects and collect the data. Using 1 evaluator instead of multiple ones would have increased the reliability of the data. In addition, controlled groups were used in neither studies therefore making it hard to comprehend the suggested benefits of both taping and bracing when the improvements owed to the natural healing process were not controlled

Get Access