Non Democratic Leaders

A democratic leader generally accept any opinion and voices which means that the team would feel free to voice their opinions and ideas without them being dismissed straight away. The positive side to this style is that the team/workforce can be highly motivated, skilled and experienced members can be used in decision making which makes them feel more committed and could less resistant to managerial changes it also help with communication between the workforce and the managers. The negative side to this style is that individuals can dominate participation or make disruptive contributions it can also be very time consuming for the leader because of the two communication it can also result in actions that are the most effective and also people may view this style as incompetent to handle the job responsibilities.

Discussion and diplomacy are also foundations of democracy. Debate and nonviolence are cornerstones of how our government works. With it, we avoid a lot of conflict and we can manage to find a compromise in coordination with other parties. Though, you have to ask yourself this question: does discussion always work? If we talked with Great Britain about seceding from their empire, would we even be our own country? We dissented and fought for our independence. Likewise, in the American Civil War, it would be completely unacceptable if we compromised on slavery. We fought so human beings could have basic rights, and there would be no way we could talk the South into abolishing slavery. Diplomacy is beneficial to democracy, but the truth is that without dissenting democracy would not exist at all.

Under the Roman Republic, there was a system of balance of power between political and religious offices, but it was not democracy for all citizens and women excluded. The senators ruled for just one year,

Where democracy falls short is in the power of religious unity. Democracy promotes secular values which would have been extremely unsuccessful at the time while the very foundation of absolutism is based on a religious concept called the theory of The Divine Right of Kings. As explained by King James I of England in 1609, the theory of The Divine Right of Kings states that “for kings are not only God’s lieutenants upon Earth, and sit upon God’s throne, but even by God himself they are called gods.” The theory explains that the King was sent from God and is accountable to nobody but God. This connection between religion and policy allows for unanimous agreement for any course of action. In the 17th and 18th

In recent weeks, quite a bit of attention has been given to the impact nontraditional activists will have on the upcoming presidential election. What do you think are the key issues these activists should require the candidates to speak on and/or clarify their positions about? Feel free to use any issues that have actually been raised if you can recall them.

Some long standing societies have failed to become democratic, even with popular support for such a political system for many different reasons. One, tradition and change is hard. Some states have such a thick religious, cultural, etc. history that they do not know how to incorporate democracy with what their state has, needs and wants. Two, they do not want a democracy. They want to be different and try something new to become better or even equal to the presence that the United States used to play as the main actor of politics worldwide. They see the United States diminishing in ways that it does not wish to, so it does not go with the democracy route. Three, some leaders may find that fear works better than anything else. Isolating people

The new political leaders/parties, their decisions, goals/intentions, all need to be unbiased and fair towards every single citizen of that state. Also, their decisions need to line up with the foundation of democracy. A new democracy needs to follow 5 essential criteria: effective participation, voting equality, enlightened understandings, a control for the agenda, and an inclusion of adults. Along with a new democratic state comes new guidelines, rules, government, and laws but these need to be fair with respect to what happened to individuals/groups. For example, very recently in Canada Islamophobia has been growing recently and the Canadian government has taken a step to enact a law that bans all forms of islamophobia (hate speech, discrimination) to make sure that islamophobia does not grow even more since the terrorist attack on the World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001. To ensure past individuals/groups injustices are not done again you need to educate the next generation, you can do this by making mandatory courses in schools to ensure they do not make the same mistakes as the generation(s) before them and making sure that the upcoming generation is raised with an open mind, this will prevent more injustices to individuals/groups in the future like how they were unfairly

That doesn’t mean that they both are democratic because they aren’t, it just means that they both believe that the government is for the people and by the people. Meaning that the leaders of the country are elected by the people. The word democratic government originates from the roman meaning that power comes from the people. They agree that there are superiors and inferiors, and that the inferiors should obey the superiors’ power; they merely agree that there is such a thing as “excessive” power and an excessive amount of differentiation between inferiors and

In the Walking Dead, Pretty Much Dead Already Rick exemplifies the meaning of democratic leadership which means (the leader encourages all the other members of the group to accept responsibility and involves the rest of the group in making and achieving goals.) An example of when Rick demonstrates this is when he goes to talk to Hershel about discussing remaining at the farm and also that he knows there are walkers in the barn. Rick is not able to get Hershel to budge at first and in fact, he even tries to tell them they have to leave the barn at the end of the week. But Rick is relentless and tells him that they need to stay there because it is the only place safe enough for his wife since she is pregnant. Later on in the episode, Rick tries

So, about a couple hundred years or so later, a form of government was established so the people could get along peacefully with no disputes. But not everything was peaceful even then. So we formed a democracy, which means that we have one president, (or ruler) who makes all decisions, with help of the government. If the people

Democracy has become the most widespread political form of government during the past decade, after the fall of all its alternatives. During the second part of the 20th century, the 3 main enemies of democracy, namely communism, fascism and Nazism, lost most of their power and influence. However, democracy is still only to be found in less than half of this world's countries. China with a fifth of the total population "had never experienced a democratic government" and Russia still doesn't have a well established democracy. By adopting a democratic perspective, 3 types of governments emerge, non-democratic, new democracies, and old democracies, and all have a different challenge to overcome: either to become democratic, to "consolidate"

Undemocratic figures are the infection, for the democratic system. It quickly, and desperately needs medicine.

LEADERS ARE BORN NOT MADE There have been an age long debate, and humans since beginning of time, have tried to come up with an answer to this question – Are Leaders born or are they made?. This question has generated an age long debate, which in turn has resulted in various school of thoughts, some believe that leaders are born, while others think otherwise. My contribution to this lifelong debate will serve as a pointer to my position on this issue. I strongly believe that leaders are born and not made. Who is a Leader? - “A leader is a person who guides others toward a common goal, showing the way by example, and creating an environment in which other team members feel actively involved in the entire process. A leader is not the boss of

During elections in countries with corrupt governments, for example, it has to be decided whether the guarantee of every individual’s right to vote or who wins is more important. (Wong, Lecture, October 24) Moreover, deep divides continue to exist and separate groups in democratic countries by race, religion, language, and class, resulting in tension and, in some cases, oppression. Thus democracy, despite its emphasis on liberty, equality and plurality, can still be problematic.

One thing any democratic state needs to do when they are setting up another new democratic state is they must make sure that the new government is seen as legitimate by the people in it. And the democracy is pretty much doomed if the people despise it. The easiest way not to have the government despised is proposed in Machiavelli’s The Prince. In it he states “It makes him hated above all things, as I have said, to be rapacious, and to be a violator of the property and women of his subjects, from both of which he must abstain. And when neither their property nor honour is touched, the majority of men live content, and he has only to contend with the ambition of a few, whom he can curb with ease in many ways.” (Machiavelli unknown page) As long as these two things are insured for the people then most rational men will not rebel.