Non Financial Performance : Human Talent

force P&G to lose market share elsewhere. Another argument was that cost of customizing P&G 's products ran into the millions, a standard product could save P&G from incurring these costs. The Euro Brand Team was created to manage these Euro-wide objectives. Each country would be given a lead role in forwarding an all-Europe strategy for a product that was most successful there. coordinated between subsidiaries in teams. Activities would be

Procter and Gamble Co. also know as P&G, is an American multinational consumer goods company, founded by William Procter and James Gamble. Its products include cleaning agents and personal care products. It has in its kitty global brands such as Ariel and Tide in the Fabric care segments and Head & Shoulder, Pantene and Rejoice is the Hair care segment. For this case study selects P&G Company as it has an important role in the consumer segment products. As P&G was a popular company, the financials statement shows better performance in the previous year.

The company is facing some issues with respect to the market sales currently. As said by Myron Rangard, National Sales manager, “retail level competition increased, authentic and high quality products are available in the market”. “ It’s difficult to find the products in South America and the political situation in Africa is causing the problem. The company has to contend with the government as it not allowing exportation due to national significance”. The competitors count has increased to 11 since the past few years. The procurement officer, David Olsen stated that “competitive bidding has caused a decrease in the gross margin and even the bargaining position eroded”.

Procter & Gamble (P&G) is a Fortune 500 American multinational company, and a world 's leading consumer goods company. P&G’s work is driven by a Purpose of providing branded products and services of superior quality and value to improve the lives of the world’s consumers now and for generations to come. P&G now has 50 Leadership Brands, which are among the world 's best known and which account for more than 90% of P&G sales. P&G entered the Chinese market through a joint venture in 1988. Now, P&G is the most successful foreign marketer in China as measured by market share.

As the brand name of Nike continue to soar, other companies in the industry; learning from the success Nike has experienced, start focusing more on brand development to keep up with the increasing levels of competition. These companies resort to brand maintenance, which has become the main target in this industry due to product differentiation made by Nike. Nike, being market-advantaged, produces an extensive range of products, through which it gains a balanced level of profits. This has influenced rival companies to initiate a new range of products in their businesses too. Previously these companies had high risks of failing in business, if their single products did not appeal to the market. Due to the impact of Nike’s business strategy, the other companies are also enlarging their product range,

In 2000, Unilever decided to reduce 1,600 brands down to 400 and then select a small number of them to serve as “Masterbrands”. One of the reasons to have fewer brands is to decrease control issues. It is harder to manage so many brands, especially when each one has its own particularities. As Deighton pointed, Unilever’s brand portfolio had grown in a relatively laissez-faire manner. In other words, the company’s brands were created without large interference.

Despite the inconsistent changes in spending from year to year, P&G’s market share consistently increased between 1% and 2% every twelve months (see Figure 1). The question is, with Unilever’s actions in regards to marketing expenditures, is the 15% increase going to be enough to restart P&G’s upward growth of market share?

Consequently P&G aimed to increase its innovative capacity and speed in order to accelerate global rollout of products and brands throughout new structures and policies. This was the main goal of Organization 2005:

The Procter & Gamble business strategy is to focus on creating new brands and categories so the company can focus on being the best in branding, innovation and scale. This is what sets this company apart from many of its competitors. The Proctor and Gamble are the global leader in all of their core businesses within the company which consists of laundry, baby care, hair care and feminine protection. This report is designed to understand the company’s business model and strategies, and analysis how the P&G has formulated its business-level strategies to pursue its business model.

During the recent past however, when the company became a more dominant global competitor and a publicly traded conglomerate, the numbers of employees leaving the firm have increased, generating adjacent problems of employee recruitment, training and retention. In other words, the major challenges currently faced by the company are related to talent management. At a more specific level, the issues refer to the following:

a good employer. Hence the employee retention rate is very low. The purpose of this report is to propose a

P&G need to work hard and do more research and development in order to produce higher quality, more innovative, and more unique in products in order to answer consumer’s need and compete with those major world brand competitors.

P&G is a multinational Organization of consumer goods situated in United States. It sells products like personal care, cleaning agents, pet foods. The P&G Company is well known for its unique strategy which cares about the need of human. It not only makes its product available to its consumers but also tries to improve the life of its consumers. This strategy is more focus on its consumers wants and that is why it has an appeal to the heart of the consumer. The company has diversified its product line and also acquired other companies which have significantly contributed in the growth of their profitability.

P&G is now one of the ten most valuable companies in the United States. During Mr. Lafley’s watch since the year 2000, sales have grown to more than $80B in 2008, from less than $40B when he took over, and earnings have tripled, topping $10B in 2007. The company has 24 brands generating more than $1B each, more than twice the number in 2000. And that number is likely to increase with close to 20 more brands with sales greater than $500M and growing. P&G’s stock, which was trading at about $28 per share when Mr. Lafley took over, now exceeds $70.

As a large global company, P&G has strengths that have helped them to acquire such a vast market share. The company’s culture, strong product quality, the ability to understand customers, brand equity, and centralized management is at the