Non-Lethal Labor Robot/Automation-Tax
As our technology speeds forward, it would have been impossible for our forefathers to foresee just how far technology would take us. This is the most logical opportunity to exercise the “Necessary and Proper” clause in Article I, Section 8 of our Constitution, which was added specifically to provide the following generations of legislators the ability to instill needed policies to adapt to present times. It is only reasonable and understandable that a Non-Lethal Labor Robot/Automation-Tax (“Robot-Tax”) is warranted due to inadequacy of our current Federal Tax Code. This “Robot-Tax”, would change federal tax law that would allow the IRS to register all robots and automated equipment employed in government, commercial, private and residential industry to collect federal robot income tax. There are specific purposes for the collection of this “Robot-Tax”, with specific rules that would apply for a specific period of time.
These are the specific purposes for the revenue to be collected by this necessary and proper “Non-Lethal Labor Robot/Automation-Tax”: 1. Maintain consistent Income Tax revenue. 2. Provide unemployment benefits for displaced workers due to the introduction of robotic and/or automated equipment. 3. Provide medical insurance and welfare benefits to the employee and his/her dependents. 4. Provide training in “Approved High-Demand Jobs” not covered under current WARN Act. 5. Funding for “Robot Studies and Legislature”
Robots can effect employment in a negative way,as said by the author Kelly “It may be hard to believe… 70 percent of today’s occupation will likewise be replaced by automation...even you will have your job taken away by machines”(Kelly Page.300), this quote comes to show the negative aspect of robots taking over the world in the near
We think of computers as being incredibly intelligent now, but actually in terms of brain power an average computer today has the intelligence of a mouse. According to Moore’s Law, computing power doubles every 18 months. In other words, it increases at an extreme rate. The rapid pace of change brings fear into the eye of a technophobe and some of today’s most eminent scientists are now warning that the evolution of technology may spell the end of humankind. Even now, the greatest threat to job creation is the increasing reliance on robotics in industrial factories. Jobs that have traditionally provided a living for millions of people are quickly being turned over to a highly efficient and cost-effective robotic
In an age where technology is so advanced that robots replace humans in the workplace, it is no surprise that increasingly fewer Americans are considered full-time employees. While proponents of advancement argue that technology adds a high level job for every low level job it takes away, low class manufacturing jobs will not be the only newly-automated jobs. Due to rapid advancement, computers are projected to be one thousand times more powerful in the 2030s than computers today (McChesney and Nichols, 2016, 246). With these improvements, no human’s job is safe.
The author's purpose of this essay is contemplating whether or not laws should be made protecting robots. Throughout the essay he uses evidence from scientists who have dones tests, and it shows how people act.
The debate over whether robots are helping or hurting the workplace is more heated than ever. Advances in technology are soaring thus making an increase in the use of robots in the workplace more and more commonplace. Some believe the use of robots in the workplace can never totally result in the loss of jobs, but due to the fact that robots have invaded the workplace environment, many people fear this indicates replacement of human jobs. Although advancement in technology of robotics and artificial intelligence may offer precision, productivity, efficiency and flexibility, the loss of human jobs will be devastating to the many people who depend on their jobs to make a living and provide for their families.
This article begins by outlining the tragic death of an artificial intelligence robot, named Steve. Steve’s accidental death, by stairs, raises a lot of new questions surrounding robots, and their rights. In his article, Leetaru, discusses the range of questions that have sparked from not only Steve’s death, but the rise of advanced robot mechanics. While the Silicon Valley is busy grinding out new plans and models of robots, especially security robots, how can we establish what a mechanical robot is entitled to? Leetaru offers many different scenarios concerning robots against aggressors, in hopes to reveal that these rights be outlined with the rise in usage of this technology. The article speculates how in the future, when these robots
Can anyone imagine a factory rid of workers and filled with robots? In the course of the next few decades it may be possible and technology replacing the jobs of hardworking people in the U.S. is an all-around controversial topic. Eventually, it will be an epidemic that will need to be resolved in the near future. Even though it may seem impossible, the age of new technology and no humans is coming.
We have already seen a decrease in jobs due to automation. Since 2000, the United States has lost 5 million factory jobs, while from 2006 to 2013, manufacturing grew by 17.6% (roughly 2.2% a year). 88% of those jobs were lost due to “productivity growth,” cites a study by Ball State University. The study also found that all sectors grew in terms of productivity by at least 32% from 1998 to 2012 when adjusted for inflation, with computer and electronic products rising 829%. In fact, the researchers found: “If 2000-levels of productivity are applied to 2010-levels of production, the U.S. would have required 20.9 million manufacturing workers instead of the 12.1 million actually employed.” In summary, due to companies’ expenditures in automation and software, the output per U.S. manufacturing worker has doubled over the past two decades. Indeed, “the real robotics revolution is ready to begin,” according to the Boston Consulting Group, who predict “the share of tasks that are performed by robots will rise from a global average of around 10% across all manufacturing industries
The idea to tax robots is a very bad idea it takes just about the same amount of money for a human worker in the end. Just to maintain and power the machines is close to the same amount for paying a normal worker. If the government wants more money it should look else where since the companies selling the product will just adapt it. It's true that a lot of Americans are unemployed but in this case, it makes sense, “Bill Gates is an American businessman who became wealthy running computer software company Microsoft. He thinks that Nexus should pay income tax, or Luke should pay a hefty tax for replacing Ken with a robot. Gates thinks it would help with the effects of robots replacing people.”(Bill Gates). This is one business person that has
After a thorough analysis of the presented options, our team has come to the conclusion that “Robots R Us” should be selected for our new manufacturing process. Although switching to fully autonomous manufacturing will be a major and somewhat controversial transition for our company, the economic benefits of this option lead to it being the most beneficial to our long term success. Not only does “Robots R Us” bring us to profitability faster than any other option, but also provides us with the highest profit margins of any manufacturing option presented.
While that dystopian future may seem rather extreme, a more modest proposal would follow that robots may not be eating babies, but they uncertainly threaten the value of our time within a workplace. Machines, to many companies, are a
Hirsch brings up an interesting point on Kelly’s article about not taking the opportunity to consider the other side of the argument, shows he is biased in favor of technology. Throughout the article he talks about the impact robots will have on the world, but what about the negativity it will bring? It can be a good thing that robots will be able to take over some hard labor work in factories, but will the workers be replaced to an easier position? For some people, doing hard labor work is better than not having a job at all. Kelly speaks, “ Humans can weave cotton cloth with great effort, but automated looms make perfect cloth today for a few cents” (306). Kelly keeps thinking about how fast and cheap robots will do the labor work, but robots
There is no doubt that robots will be our future. They have already taken jobs of thousands of people and will continue to take jobs with new advancements everyday. The reason robots are taking these jobs is because they are cheaper than paying humans that can make mistakes and fatigue. Both blue collar and white collar jobs are under attack, with manufacturing in factories and microprocessors or other artificial intelligence in hospitals, law firms, and laboratories (Lyons). The only fields that are really safe from being replaced are jobs that take creativity and emotion such as artists, filmmakers, and therapists. With new technology, they are becoming more and more common and have also been used in fields of work
In a recent study(pdf), economists Daren Acemoglu of MIT and Pascual Restrepo of Boston University try to quantify how worried we should be about robots. They examine the impact of industrial automation on the US labor market from 1990 to 2007. They conclude that each additional robot reduced employment in a given commuting area by 3-6 workers, and lowered overall wages by 0.25-0.5%. (Kopf)
If you think robots are the kind of thing you hear about in science-fiction movies, think again. Right now, all over the world, robots are performing thousands of tasks. They are probing our solar system for signs of life, building cars at the General Motors plants, assembling Oreo cookies for Nabisco and defusing bombs for the SWAT team. As they grow tougher, more mobile, and more intelligent, today’s robots are doing more and more of the things that humans can’t or don’t want to do and in many cases taking away the need for human labor.