Nonviolent Methods Used By Randall Robinson, Mahatma Gandhi, And Cesar Chavez

One of the reasons Cesar Chavez is recognized as a civil rights leader is that he was able to achieve his goals without the use of

Mahatma Gandhi: Gandhi was born in Porbandar, India in 1869 and died in 1948. He was western educated, specifically trained in England. Although he was a nationalist, he was anti-modern because he was skeptical to industrialism. He believed in the ideal of satyagraha, the non-tolerance of evil, but also the understanding that violence is not the answer to that evil. He also believed in non-violence. He did not cooperate with anything British, specifically trading with the British, British schooling or products, and even paying taxes to the British. He served as a civil rights activist after being thrown off a train when refusing to move from his seat in first class. He became the leading member of Congress Party in the 1930’s and shortly after participated in the March to Sea for salt during the British imposed salt tax. Every single aspect of Gandhi’s life was peaceful, if the people around him decided to disobey and use violence as a means of getting what they wanted, Gandhi would take it upon himself to fast. He was eventually assassinated by a Hindus

Mahatma Gandhi changed India’s history forever through disobedience. Even though he disobeyed the law he had a good reason to. India was under the British rule and the people were doing as british were telling them to do because they had no other option. Gandhi was the one who didn’t do as the british said, but instead stood against it because he knew that what they were doing was unfair. As he have said, “A man who was completely innocent, offered himself as a sacrifice for the good of others, including his enemies, and became the ransom of the world. It was a perfect act”. He disobeyed the british laws to free

Gandhi, King, and Mandela each fought for their causes with a method that was very rarely used but even less rarely successful. Their efforts at peaceful protest without retaliation to attacks were successful in overthrowing trans-continental rule and ending segregation of races. Gandhi transformed the idea of non-violence into a way to fight for freedom and justice which would ultimately end in success and

Mohandas Gandhi was born in 1869 in the Indian coastal city of Porbandar (Background Essay). He then studied law in London, where he noticed that Indians were expected to imitate their rulers, the Englishmen (Background Essay). Gandhi wanted all people to live free, even those imposed by India’s caste system so he decided to take action in a peaceful manner (Background Essay). By doing so he was able to gain India’s independence in 1947 (Background Essay). This caused Gandhi to be known as “ Mahatma” or “ Great Soul” because he was able to do it without violence (Background Essay). Gandhi’s nonviolent movement worked because he accepted the consequences to his actions, strived for fairness to all mankind, and didn’t think of the British as enemies.

British rule was tough on many Indians. Gandhi, an Indian born lawyer, believed in freedom and peace for his people. He once experienced racism when he was kicked out of a train in Europe. He changed people’s point of view without breaking the law, which was tough for him. Gandhi made his nonviolent movement work through the use of determination, peaceful civil disobedience, and being a powerful leader.

Fighting for rights does not have to be violent. Mother Jones fought for child labor laws, Cesar Chavez fought for migrant workers’ rights, and Gandhi fought for independence from Britain. Mother Jones, Cesar Chavez, and Mahatma Gandhi all helped to enact change by using peaceful methods to get their points across.

When people think about nonviolent movement leaders, the first person people think of is Mahatma Gandhi. Born in October 2, 1869, Gandhi is known for his accomplishment for freeing India from Britain in 1947 with no violence. But how did he do it? His nonviolent movement worked because he had mass appeal, compassion, and clever planning helped him free India.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a civil rights leader who fought with nonviolence against the inequalities the black community faced. After the 10th anniversary of King Jr.’s death, Cesar Chavez wrote an article about nonviolence resistance by using rhetorical choices such as diction, pathos, and allusion.

Mahatma Gandhi was the leader of the Indian independence movement against British rule. He proposed a speech to all of his followers explaining what his resolution was to gain independence, without using violence. Mahatma Gandhi adopts a subtle and affirmative tone while revealing that non violence and the spreading of love is the way to approach this movement for independence. He also portrays his outline for the movement by appealing to the audience's emotions.

There comes a time, in most citizens’ lives when they must stand against their government to produce change. Change can only be acquired if people take the necessary actions for it to take place. Nelson Mandela was a historical revolutionist who helped his people in Africa, to revolt against the government, in order to bring about change. As a result, he was sentenced to prison for 27 years for trying to overthrow the government. Many revolutionist, such as Arundhati Roy and Martin Luther King Jr., explain in their essays how the role of the citizen is to stand against injustice, and how the government labels them as anti-national because of it.

During the sixties, the principles of democracy and “equality for all” did not apply for blacks and minority groups. At a time where courts were biased, politics were racist, and the police were hostile, there were no opportunities for advancement for colored people. Rather than using hostile, aggressive tactics to fight these injustices, King opted to practice nonviolence to combat inequality. From his famous March on Washington to diner and bus boycotts, his ability to use “non-violent direct action…” to develop “...such a crisis and establish such creative tension that… seeks to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored” (King). Often times in history, negative dissention can dissuade and stigmatize the groups that protest laws they feel are unjust. Many lawmakers and citizens felt that blacks had equal rights and did not deserve equal services that were afforded to white citizens. However, King brought needed social change as a dissenter in a democratic society compared to other protests by upholding the idea that laws should be protested with creative solutions that promoted non violence. Fifty years later King’s beliefs and struggles allow blacks and white to see equal protection and opportunities under American

Even though, many people disagreed with Mahatma Gandhi’s beliefs and morals that does not justify his assassination. Mahatma Gandhi was the main leader of the Indian Independence Movement from British rule. He played a big part in demonstrating peaceful protest as India successfully broke away from the British rule. Gandhi was assassinated at the age of seventy-eight on January 30th, 1948 by Nathuram Godse. The reasons for why Godse assassinated Gandhi were because of religious differences that they believed. These reasons are simply just major differences in beliefs and they are not justifiable to assassinate someone for, especially someone that is a hugely well known peace maker. Overall no matter how severe your differences of beliefs are with someone, it does not make it reasonable to assassinate them.

Mahatma Gandhi is a religious Indian who wanted independence from the British for his people. He wanted to do this in a peaceful way because he did not want violence. Mahatma Gandhi was called to adventure when

Gandhi was a well appreciated man who tried to bring peace to all of those throughout India. After the two nations(India and Pakistan) gained their Independence, Gandhi tried to unite the Muslims and Hindus to perform one independent nation. Which caused a lot of chaos between the two religions.during this time period Gandhi was getting older and had many physical problems around the age of 77, this was a cause from all of his fasts. We are here today to talk to you about Gandhi’s assassination and the many events leading up to it.