Nonviolent Protest

It’s hard to make people listen. It’s hard to make people want change. And using violence brings a bad reputation to what one is trying to bring attention to. Thus, peaceful protesting and civil disobedience are important tools to positively impact a free society. Accepting the consequences of civil disobedience proves to the world that one will sacrifice whatever is necessary to achieve what they are fighting for, which strengthens their message even more.

Since the beginning of american history there have been peaceful and non peaceful protests. These protests have had valuable effects on American society such as Martin Luther King Jr and Rosa Parks have impacted society greatly and for the better. In my opinion peaceful protests still have negative effects though they are immensely more appropriate than non peaceful protests because peaceful protests often turn violent because people don't know how to act for example Trump Protests.

Like many groups that participated in peaceful protests, they did found their frustrations difficult to keep at bay, and difficult to remain civil. Despite these frustrations, their protests did remain non-violent.

All things considered one must devoted to their belief of nonviolence and be willing to suffer without retaliation (Source C), they can not fall victim to anger and fight back, for it would destroy the very principle of the cause. To become a truly successful campaign it should not be run on the basis of humiliating or besting the opponent, rather one should seek friendship and a better understanding of another (Source B). A nonviolent protester should not become bitter of the circumstances the opponent might bestow upon them but rather have open arms and eye for a better future ahead. The central idea of a nonviolent campaign is being able to make changes and spreading peace and love without the use of violence; by pursuing upon this path

Throughout history, many solutions to a problem was protesting at where the official government or leader headquarters are without necessarily involving physical violence. Instead, verbal actions are used in this method of protesting. The purpose of this movement without actions is to stand up for what they believe in and try their best to put their country in the best conditions a environment could be. This can be interpreted as a peaceful movement that is aiming for a change in a restriction that can benefit the citizens in the community.

Martin Luther King Jr. discusses the advantages and purposes for his theory of nonviolent direct action in his Letter From Birmingham City Jail. He shows four basic steps that must be taken to achieve nonviolent action. They include 1) collection of facts to determine whether injustices are alive; 2) negotiation; 3) self-purification; and 4) direct action. Each of these steps will be explained as part of King's argument later in this essay. The main purpose of a nonviolent campaign is to force any community to confront a problem rather than refuse to negotiate or face a specific issue. In the letter, King discusses his group's reasons for coming to Birmingham.

Through protesting people can express their beliefs in a nonviolent way in order to raise awareness and possibly gain support from

Protests riots in the United States has proven to an issue for both the country’s financial strength and the unity of the nation. With the presence of social injustices, combined with the increased impact of social media propaganda, protests riots are beginning to reach an all time high. Protest riots destroy individual communities and businesses, jeopardizes the safety of others and taints the protest’s cause by resorting to civil disobedience. Action must be done in order to prevent these random acts of violence from continuing after every social hot topic. The goal is not to prevent citizens from protesting; in fact, this should be encouraged. The goal is to change the way the protests are handled from both the citizens and authority perspectives, in order to prevent these protests from escalating into something dangerous.

Since the dawn of human civilization, there have been governments. As a species, we have always attempted to efficiently and systematically maintain order. However it is not uncommon for those same governments to turn on the people it protects, as evidenced by the countless tyrants and authoritarian regimes that plague our history. When studying the complex subject of a free or oppressive government, it is rather interesting to look at the stark contrasts between how both of these organizations handle protests against their rules or laws. The authoritarian regime holds absolute power, meaning that nearly any form of complaint against their actions will be met with disregard, or even punishment. However in a free society in which the government must answer to the people, protests are the language of the discontent, signifying to a representative government that change is needed.

Research Paper During the Revolutionary War, Thomas Jefferson said, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” It is inferred that he believed that revolution could only be triumphant if there were violence and sacrifices. Many would argue that a solution can be attained through peace and non-violent practices. The theory of civil disobedience coincides with the concept of non-violent protesting.

Peaceful resistance also known as civil disobedience; by definition, is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. To me, civil disobedience is the thought and or action in one’s mind after they break a law or rule, and they automatically accept the consequences, without question.

Civil disobedience is the backbone of all free nations. The positive influences of this act are visible in every aspect of life. Civil disobedience is peacefully disobeying any law thought unjust while accepting all legal repercussions. Peaceful resistance instigates change, allows communication with the government, and gives nation’s citizens power.

Sometimes in order to change something for good, one must or many must do what’s wrong but must be willing to face the consequences that come with it. Not consequences for doing illegal acts of demonstrations but instead for doing what they were being advised to not do. “Letter from Birmingham Jail“by Martin Luther King Jr., he states that there are four basic steps in a non-violent campaign. Kings says they are “collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist, negotiation, self-purification, and direct action.”(King) In the letter he also explains why direct action can be effective, he says “Non-violent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the

Sometimes you think you are bettering the world, when in reality, you are making it worse. Due to the recent inauguration, protests and marches have been appearing in the main cities of the U.S., as well as multiple foreign countries. These so called “peaceful” protests have become extremely violent and destructive, causing hundreds of arrests and injuries to the Republicans standing up for their President. Although the government’s decisions will not be affected by these protests, they continue to exaggerate their First Amendment and destroy privately owned property. The political protests regarding Trump’s recent inauguration are ineffective and must be controlled.

Whether peaceful protests are just or not is not the most important aspect of them, they cause citizens to question their belief in laws, which is how a society evolves. As Charles Frankel reminds readers in his article “Is it Right to Break the Law?” citizens need to take responsibility for their choices and their hand in making laws. Peaceful protest help to make others aware of their hand in the subjugation or empowerment of others. Aware citizens are necessary for free society, without them, citizens blindly following delivers the government back into the hands of the