preview

Normal Percipient Analysis

Decent Essays

Smart and sensations

According to Smart (1959/1970) there is “nothing in the world but increasingly complex arrangements of physical constituents” (p. 53), and this includes “states of consciousness” (Smart, 1959/1970, p.53.) Smart argues for the closest possible identity between consciousness and brain. Consciousness is not just correlated, for correlation would entail that there is “something over and above” (Smart, 1959/1970, p. 53). Thus, Smart (1959/1970) argues that “the true nature of lightning is revealed by science, it is an electric discharge”(p. 57), and the ‘perception’ of the lightning, “the publicly observable physical object” ‘lightning’ is not a “visual-datum”, it is the “brain state caused by the lightning”. (Smart, 1959/1970, p.58), in other words, according to Smart, the perception of an event is a direct result of a brain state that is produced by the observable event, produced by the neurological properties of the brain being, in Smart view, seems to be the same for all the subjects if they are a “normal percipient” (Smart, 1959/1970, p. 59) …show more content…

For instance, Smart (1959/1970) argues that the colour experience works to produce “discriminatory responses in human beings” (p.60), for instances, according to Smart, to say I see a colour is like to say “[a] normal percipient would not easily pick this out of a clump of geranium petals though he would pick it out of a clump of lettuce leaves” (Smart, 1959/1970, p.59). In other words, when we experience a stimuli what our “sensations” do is just report through discrimination the sort of object that we have [in normal circumstances] before us. For example, Smart suggests that when we say ‘I see a yellow after image’ we are strictly speaking

Get Access