Norman Borlaug In Leon Hesser's The Man Who Fed The World

In a piece by Peter Singer entitled, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Singer argues that Americans should prevent atrocious situations to arise but, we also should not sacrifice something of equal importance while doing so. Moreover, in the piece by John Arthur, “World Hunger and Moral Obligation: The Case Against Singer,” Arthur disagrees with Singer; he believes that we should help the poverty-stricken but, it is not morally imperative to do so.

     In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer is trying to argue that “the way people in relatively affluent countries react to a situation… cannot be justified; indeed,… our moral conceptual scheme needs to be altered and with it, the way of life that has come to be taken for granted in our society”(Singer 230). Peter Singer provides striking examples to show the reader how realistic his arguments are. In this paper, I will briefly give a summary of Peter Singer’s argument and the assumptions that follow, adding personal opinions for or against Peter’s statements. I hope that within this paper, I am able to be clearly show you my thoughts in regards to Singer.

Indian groups have adopted agriculture. The ability to grow crops has a huge implication for the

In this paper I will defend John Arthur’s argument of entitlement and desert against Peter Singer’s theory of our duty to the global poor. We as privileged citizens, living in a prosperous country, do have some responsibility to help the tens of thousands of children under the age of 5 who die everyday from starvation and treatable disease. It seems natural that we as citizens of a first world country have a duty to help the global poor through charity. However that “duty” is vague and is under heavy moral debate. We as privileged citizens, living in a prosperous country, do have some responsibility to help the global poor. However, this rightful duty should not necessarily live up to the extreme and overwhelming expectations of Peter Singer. John Arthur’s argument of entitlement and desert is more realistic, logical, and more applicable to the world we live in today.

While growing up, life as I knew it seemed to be great. I didn’t know the difference between the hungry and fed. Until middle school, famine was a myth. Realization set in upon learning more about the world. As soon as research, evidence, and lessons were placed before me, I wanted to know more. By the time age 13 hit, I started to live what I once wanted to learn about and strive to fight against. I realized that the fed can become the hungry.

Within “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” Peter Singer delves into the topic of famine; specifically, the moral obligations individuals in affluent countries have to those who are suffering. In his example, Singer focuses on the population of East Bengal, and their struggle with famine and extreme poverty. Singer proposes that with enough aid from both individuals and various governments extreme poverty can be eradicated. Therefore, the question he presents is why poor people are dying while affluent people are spending excess money on luxuries? Singer argues that affluent people, living in affluent countries, are not helping developing countries by failing to give enough to alleviate extreme poverty.

Published on September 5, 1999, in The New York Times Magazine, the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, was written by philosopher Peter Singer. This article states that the solution to world poverty is for Americans to donate income, not vital for necessities, to aid overseas organizations. Throughout his argument, Peter Singer uses such strategies as ethos, pathos, and logos to build his attempt at a legitimate argument. Thousands of children die every single day due to hunger, and using various logical fallacies Singer seems to ring on the reader’s emotions, making them feel guilty. Although Singer’s argument seems to be very unrealistic, it is true that people should be more aware of poverty, and take the necessary action to try to prevent it. American’s have worked for their wealth, so why should we be to blame for world hunger? Through Singers many hypothetical narrations he convinces readers that the fulfillment of indulgences of luxuries is trivial in comparison to the needs of the world’s poor.

This essay seeks to highlight the distinct narrative between Peter Singer and Jan Narveson. Firstly, drawing on the works of Singer, this essay will lay out the argument which states that we have a moral duty of justice to aid the global poor. Notable counter-arguments raised by Narveson will be reconstructed. Here, Narveson argues that citizens of affluent nations have no obligation to aid starving citizens. Finally, this essay will critically assess both Singer and Narveson’s works in order to offer a distinct argument that justifies a “hybrid” position to the obligation of aiding the global poor. Here, this essay will suggest, a la Singer, that aiding the global poor is a moral obligation of justice. Drawing on Narveson, this essay lays

A study drove by Doug Gurian-Sherman who is a lead researcher in UCS Sustenance and Environment System, demonstrates that hereditarily built corn assortments have just expanded harvest yields possibly while designed soybean assortments have not expanded yields by any means. The UCS properties the generous increment in harvest yields over the previous decade to a great extent to customary reproducing and changes in rural aptitudes. Indeed the study ventures to suggest that the U.S. Bureau of Horticulture expel subsidizing from GMO contemplates and divert it to other, more useful uses and projects. This disputable point has numerous contentions some of which I was not able say yet I have still to some degree possessed the capacity to detail my own sentiment with respect to the theme. On the premise of Hereditary building we can reason that it is still in its earliest stages and shockingly little is thought about its results in both short and more terms on people, while even less is known with respect to its impacts on the

Primarily, India is a quintessential example of the horrific environmental and agri-‘cultural’ effects. Monsanto’s presence in India has existed for over half a century, but MOU’s with the Indian government, along with pressure from the WTO at the turn of the century, forced many indian farmers to purchase GMO crops and their herbicide counterparts. As a result of the forced dependence on Monsanto products, which were significantly more expensive over time due to repurchase legal agreements and to the crops’ genetic sterility, many farmers in India could not afford basic needs (The World…). This led to many suicides, ironically via the consumption of Monsanto’s patented Roundup, numbering over 250,000 since 1995 (“Monsanto’s…”). Summarily, GMO crops have had varying degrees of negative outcomes for farmers and consumers both in Western and developing countries. Yet some argue that Monsanto’s presence in these places are integral to crop yields and the overall economic well-being of countries who implement GMO products into their respective agricultural

By highlighting the effects that the experimentation of the hybrid cotton plant, Hazareesingh explains the locals’ prejudices and the Indian government’s role. To begin, Hazareesingh explains that the experimenters had prejudices that the cotton plant they created was superior to the Kumta cotton. They also believed that they had superior cultivation

Did you know that Norman Borlaug was the oldest child in his family and the only boy with three younger sisters? He was also born on his grandparents farm in Saudi Iowa in 1914. Not only did Norman grow up on a farm ,but he has also won many awards. For example, he won the Nobel Peace Prize, Presidential Medal of Freedom, India’s second highest civilian honor Padma Vibhushan, and the Congress Gold Medal. Not only did he win numerous awards but, Norman also created an award called The World Food Prize. Norman Borlaug helped feed thousands of people in struggling third world countries. He did this by changing plant genetics so they could grow in harsh environments that don’t have that many resources. Norman was also able to win the Nobel

Heifer International is a global organization that focuses on providing communities in developing counties with better farming techniques and education, allowing them to pull away from the never-ending cycle of poverty. Founder Dan West came up with the idea for Heifer International when he was an aid worker during the Spanish Civil War. During his time as an aid worker, one of his tasks was to provide hungry refugees with a single glass of milk. While doing this he suddenly had the thought “What if they had not a cup of milk, but a cow”(World Hunger and Poverty). From this one thought Heifer International was born. Since its creation in 1944, Heifer International has grown tremendously, operating on four continents and tailoring their

One of the most problematic issue in America is hunger. Many people day by day from a young age as adults struggle to stay on their feet not only to feed themselves, but other individuals. Poverty is the main cause which lead young generations to fall being in society due to the standard requirements that they may need to meet, but don't qualify. Gongloff within his article mentioned, “More than 45 million people, or 14.5 percent of all Americans, lived below the poverty line.” This demonstrates how even the most stable country has citizens dealing with starvation no matter how rich or poor the country is. A remarkable organization dealing with hunger is Feeding America. Feeding America started in the year 1979, which was created by John van Hengel in Phoenix, Arizona. Today, Feeding America is the nation's largest domestic hunger relief organization which is a very powerful and successful network. It contains 200 food banks across the country that “help provide food to more than 46 million people through 60,000 food pantries and meal programs.” (Feeding America). The social problem is addressed by Feeding America by “millions of children and adults who do not get the meals they need to thrive. We work to get nourishing food – from farmers, manufacturers, and retailers – to people in need. At the same time, we also seek to help the people we serve build a path to a brighter, food-secure future.”(Feeding America) For those people who donate just $1 the organization can

The initial increase in production was centred on the irrigated areas of the Indian states of Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh. With both the farmers and the government officials focusing on farm productivity and knowledge transfer, India's total foodgrain production soared. A hectare of Indian wheat farms that produced an average of 0.8 tons in 1948, produced 4.7 tons of wheat in 1975 from the same land. Such rapid growths in farm productivity enabled India to become self-sufficient by the 1970s. It also empowered the smallholder farmers to seek further means to increase food staples