Normative Ethics And Ethical Ethics

Meta-ethics considers the questions of moral language. Metaethics unlike normative ethics that looks at the act or characteristic of right and wrong, it looks at right and wrong more by implications of what is the nature of good and bad. Metaethics tends to ask the questions of what are the difference

“Brad is a production engineer at a bicycle company and part of his job includes inspecting broken bikes and drafting the design repairs for their repair” (Bartlett). Brad is considering replacing a broken brake cable with a more durable material, even though the customer did not request it in their order and specifically requested that “No aesthetic changes be made to the bike” (Bartlett). Brad’s manager suggests that his considered actions would go against the company’s policy of “The customer is always right.” Should Brad disobey the manager and the customer to possibly lose his job or go along with

The three most frequently used approaches to normative ethics are, in no particular order of importance, virtue theory, deontology, and utilitarianism (Hursthouse, 2012). As such, there are a number of inherent differences and similarities that exist between these philosophical approaches to determining what sort of behavior constitutes that which is moral. In fact, the relevance of all three philosophies to the determination of action that is deemed ethically sanctioned is the chief similarity that exists between these three approaches to normative ethics. Yet in doing so, each of these philosophies chooses to emphasize diverse aspects of a particular situation to indicate that which is morally permissible.

Consequentialism Deontology Virtue Theory example Mill 's utilitarianism Kantian ethics Aristotle 's moral theory abstract description An action is right if it promotes the best consequences. An action is right if it is in accordance with a moral rule or principle. An action is right if it is what a virtuous agent would do in the circumstances. more concrete specification The best consequences are those in which happiness is maximized. A moral rule is one that is required by rationality. A virtuous agent is one who acts virtuously, that is, one who has and exercises the virtues. A virtue is a character trait a human being needs to flourish or live well.

When defining what Ethical Theory is my first thought is morals. Morals principles affects the way people make decisions and the why people live their own lives. Ethics come from a Greek work ethos, and this means character, habits, customs and dispositions. The morals that Ethical theory will display in a person life, is living a good life for them and their families, knowing what is right in life and taking care of their responsibilities. Researchers, divides ethical theories into three basic groups, first group is meta- ethics, the second group is applied ethics and the last groups is normative ethics. Meta-ethics deals with origins and ethical principles. Applied ethics is related to controversial topic like politics or war. Normative ethics concerned with moral judgements of what is right or wrong. Reflecting back to meta-ethics is having morals judgments, morals allow people need morals and value to as a person. When a person realize what is important in determine moral judgment, and the ethical

Philosophers split ethical theories into three groups, meta-ethics, normative ethics and applied ethics. Meta-ethics is the nature of moral judgement and the meaning of ethical principles. Normative ethics deals with the content of moral judgement and the rules for what is right and wrong. Applied ethics deals with controversial subjects like animal rights, war and capital punishment.

This way usually tells us the good things that we should do what we should follow, and how we treat others effects people. Even though there are three different ways of ethics it can be very foggy to navigate because issues in ethics can be so similar you have to look at everything. The reason that metaethics is important for determining moral judgements is because it is important for everyone to be able to correctly tell you with logic Their metaethics position. Metaethics allows you to dive deeper into what ethics is, it’s important to go into the why something may be good or bad, right or wrong.

In this section I will be briefly discussing one major Ethical view, theory and model and explaining their useful applications and limitations through examples. There are four major ethical topics we have discussed in the course, in this reflection I will examine the three I see most fitting for this reflection. The three are utilitarianism, moral rights and the Theory of Justice.

Ethics is the code of conduct that is widely known in this society. The ethical theory of Aristotle states that the good moral of human beings is as a result of the rational reasoning of human beings over what is wrong or right. He argued that whatever is thought to be good has to be applied to everywhere. On the other side of the story, Immanuel Kant’s ethical theory states that the individual’s ethical morals are the result of the combination of the ability to reason rationally and the presence of the good character traits in an individual. Both reasonable theory’s nothing wrong with either of them.

Utilitarianism is one of the general moral theories of normative ethics, which is made up of two principles: utility and equality. Utility is to maximize things like happiness, pleasure, and desire-satisfaction. Equality is the principle that the interests of all members of the moral community who are involved are completely equal. The utilitarian theory, therefore, tries to create the most amount of well being and the least amount of displeasure or suffering. To apply the utilitarian view to whether it is possible to be an ethical carnivore, consideration of all the interest of all those involved is essential, which would include humans and non-human animals. Farmers, meat eaters, animals, activists are all affected by ethical and unethical choices made by carnivores. One way to be an ethical carnivore, according to the utilitarian view, would be to consume happy meat, which is meat that is raised, treated and killed humanely, minimizing suffering to animals. According to philosopher Peter Singer, animals have the ability to feel pain and so have an interest in avoiding pain; this makes animals part of the moral community says Singer .In a utilitarian based world, if all meat eaters would only purchase happy meat, it would substantially reduce the pain and suffering of the non human members of the moral community and thus maximizing the good for the most number of beings thus supporting that there can be such a thing as an ethical carnivore.

What is a right or obligation? What is good or bad? These two questions are examples of why mete-ethics and normative ethics exist. To be able to create an environmental ethic, one must have a sense of moral conclusion. Whether these morals are categorized through self-interest or obligation, meta ethics and normative ethics try to decipher these notions. To derive a normative ethic, meta-ethics needs to explain the language of morality, and how do humans come to a consensus of specific actions and thoughts. Ethics, by short definition, is how we (humans) relate to other beings (humans, animals, environment, etc.). Language such as, “right”, “wrong”, “good”, “bad”, and “obligation” are defined in different ways by different people,

One day you wake up and you are faced with a dreaded decision: to sacrifice a family member to save the man who has the cure to cancer, or to sacrifice the man who has the cure to cancer to save the family member. These scenarios are ones that seem impossible to formulate an answer for. Would you rather save millions of lives or save the individual closest to you? One way that makes this scenario slightly easier to answer is from a Utilitarianism form of view. Utilitarianism is a theory of normative ethics defined as, “the view that right actions are those that result in the most beneficial balance of good over bad consequences for everyone involved” (191). If one day you were to wake up and be faced with an impossible decision,

Ethics also known as moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that involves the classification, defense and endorsement of concepts of right and wrong actions that govern an individual’s behavior. Based on the “Billy and Suzy” scenario from a utilitarian ethical perspective, I would choose to follow Billy to ensure that nothing transpires between him and the lady he left the bar with. The best action to take would be to follow him and ensure that he does not leave for the night with the lady. I would force him into a cab if need be and ensure he gets home. Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory that places the morality of right and wrong solely on the consequences and effects of choosing to take one course of action over another. This is in light of taking into account the interests of others over your own.

There are eight major ethical theories the ones that were focused on in the video were deontological and utilitarian. The deontological theory is the sense of obligation, that someone feels that it their morally duty to do the right thing. The utilitarian theory is that people act and behave so that they will produce happiness for the greatest number of people. These two different ethical theories are ways that people behave and think is morally correct.

Ethics are moral principles that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity. Ethics differ from religions to culture depending on the upbringing of the person and prior education. Ethical Understanding is accepting diverse options and considering all opinions to obtain a fair understanding of often debatable topics. It also helps people make unbiased decisions and appreciate that everyone is different. People can coexist with different ethical beliefs and can regularly change their viewpoints. Cheating is an example an unethical behavior. Although most people consider it wrong, some people believe it can enhance games and make it more fun. A person with good ethical understanding