Normative Influences Over Childhood And Adolescence

“Trying to separate out nature and nurture as explanations for behavior, as in classic genetic studies of twins and families, is now said to be both impossible and unproductive” (Levitt, 1). Social scientists have declared the nature-nurture debate to be unnecessary. Similarly, scientists feel that such debate is not only unhelpful, but also outdated. From geneticists’ perspective, nurture and nature interact to influence

Nature or Nurture, which of these are the most important in shaping who we are? “Are genetics or environmental factors more important?” (Berk, 2014, p. 5) Researchers have been arguing whether nature or nurture is the most influential force in shaping human beings for a long time. The answer seems to be a complex combination of both nature and nurture. One thing that everybody can agree on is that human beings are more than the sum of our parts

The controversy on whether children develop their intellectual attributes based on their genetics or the environment they have been raised in has been a topic of debate over the past years between psychologists. It is known as “Nature versus Nurture” and has lead people to question how a child’s development is influenced. Research has shown that signs of nurture is more evident in the development of a person than nature is. The way we are raised and brought up can greatly be influenced by our environment and surroundings within our childhood and the personality and behaviours we develop.

The classic debated topic of Nature versus Nurture has been and will always be a quarrelsome subject in the scientific world. Meaning, the issue of the level to which environment and heredity sway behavior and development in a person. Nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. This means the behaviors is based on the inherited makeup of an individual and is an influence of the growth and development of that individuals’ all through life. On the other hand nurture is causes of behaviors that are environmental. This Intel’s the influence is from the individual’s parents, siblings, family, friends and all other experiences that individual exposed to during life. However, these concept of ideas supports the inborn genetic framework,

Scholars around the world commonly discuss the topic of “nature vs. nurture” in relation to the importance of an individual’s inherent qualities. All aspects of human behavior are affected by both nature and nurture, operating together. Nature refers to the factors that have shaped the genetics that we inherit from our parents and ancestors. Nurture refers to all the things that have influenced us since we began to develop- even from the moment we were conceived. Therefore, nature determines the range of our human potential while nurture affects the ways that our human potential is objectified, being helped or hindered by good or bad environmental contributions.

One of the main, and most controversial topics discussed in a child’s development is, nature vs. nurture. Nature pertains to genetic influences that a child has inherited from their parents, such as traits, abilities, and capacities. For instance, what color eyes the child may have, how athletic they may be, and even their brain development. Whereas nurture, refers to the environment the child is raised in and how this shapes their behaviors. Such factors can include, the family’s socio-economic status, schooling, parental discipline, as well as whether the child is provided with enough resources. When it comes to nature or nurture having a stronger influence then the other, the answer is both, nature and nurture, influence the outcome of the child. This idea that both nature and nurture, play a part in how the child will develop, is known as the nature-nurture continuum.

Through history, the idea of nature vs. nurture has been a hotly debated issue. Nature, or genetics is often believed to be the most important aspect of a persons’ upbringing, as nature is something intrinsic to any one person. However, many debate that nurture, or the care and encouragement of any human life, trumps nature. The earliest evidence and rebuttals of these theories have been honed and developed over time by specific psychologists and educational theorists – all who hoped to prove their own ideas as fact at one time in history.

Nature against nurture – that’s one of the most popular questions ever studied in psychology. Even today no one knows for sure what’s more valuable for our human development – nurture or nature. Many researches, experiments and discussions have been conducted to answer this question, but positive results are still unavailable. In this nature vs nurture essay you’ll find a brief history, significant characteristics of the nature versus nurture problem and fresh original thoughts on the

Nature versus Nurture has been a prolonged debate since the beginning of modern science. The argument is whether our characteristics, personality and behavior are affected by the environment or heredity. The nature theory is that our genes and hereditary plays a factor on how we look to the different traits we have. On the other hand, the nurture theory is that the environment and our personal experiences has an impact on who we are. Therefore, both factors play a major role in determining why some people commit serious crimes or to study if an adopted child has more in common with their biological family or adopted family.

This perspective is contrasted by research evidence, however tests on identical twins suggest that environmental influences have a big effect on child development. Epigenetic studies have shown that “genes, though still important, have lost their privileged and prominent status, particularly as the distinction between nature and nurture disappears” (Keller, 2010). However, strong evidence is emerging to show that nature and nurture are interrelated in complex ways (Plomin, et.al,2013), and therefore they emerge together in the development of an individual

Since the beginning of the science of mental process and behavior, psychologists have pondered what contributes to the development of psychological traits and behaviors. Some psychologists such as Nativists argue that certain substances naturally develop regardless of environment. While others, Empiricists, like John Locke assert that experiences contribute to the development. As one can see, there can be disagreements on the topic. Essentially, these two arguments became known as the nature versus nurture issue. In other words, this is defined as the ancient controversy over the relative contributions that genes and experience make to the development of psychological traits and behaviors. Personally, I agree and accept that both nature and

Human characters and traits can be shaped by heredity or environmental factors; in other words, it can be the result of genes and or the result of life experiences. Genes play a big role in determining our physical appearances like heights and colors, but the important question is: do the same genes that determine our genotype, tendencies toward traits such as humor, violence, likes and dislikes, hyperactivity and homosexuality. This debate has been One of the biggest debates in psychology; It’s The nature-nurture controversy; heredity vs. environment. In mental development science, there is a solid suggestion that nature and nurture interact to produce every specific trait; no characteristic develops as an exclusive response to either nature

The development of human being during the entire course of life, focus on biological and psychological growth (Berk, 2010). Human development hold several outcomes that are altered by both positive and negative influences. Genetic (nature) and environmental (nurture) influences place significant impact on human development. In fact, Pinker (2004) submits that behavior is the result of a complex collaboration among inheritance and environmental factors in human development, ultimately supporting that nature-nurture work collectively (Pinker, 2004).

Is our personality based on how, where, and who raised us or who are parents or “genes” are? Well that is one thing that people and researchers have been debating over, or so the video says, but really how are we to know if it is between the ‘nature’ or ‘nurture’ of how and what we grow up to be. In order to find out, I guess we would have to have some type of clinical, or study, to be able to figure it out. But wait if it all depends on “genes” does it mean that it doesn’t depend on ‘nurture’ or ‘nature’ but merely on

Noted psychologist Jerome Kagan once said “Genes and family may determine the foundation on the house, but time and place determine its form” (Fraser). The debate on nature versus Nurture has been a mystery for years now, constantly begging the question on what has a greater effect on the human development of humans. Is human behavior, ideas, and feelings innate or are they learned over time. Nature, or genetic influences, are formed before birth and shaped through early experiences. Genes are viewed as long and complicated chains that are present thought life and develop over time. Nature supporters believe that genes form a child’s conscience and determine one’s approach to life. Nurture is constituted of the influence of millions of complex environmental factors that form a child’s character. Advocators of Nurture do not believe that character is predetermined by genes, but formed over time. Since the 1600’s studies have been conducted to find the answer to what has a greater effect on human development. The studies have shown substantial evidence that human development is greatly affected by both the concept of Nature and Nurture. Although they are interpreted two separated concepts, they both are needed for humans to successfully psychologically develop as they both work contribute about the same amount in human development.