Northeastern Federalists: Vice President Aaron Burr

Chapter One: The Duel was a well-known duel in American history. Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton. July 11, 1804 is the exact date when the duel took place. It was presumed to have taken place in Weehawken, New Jersey; when in actuality, the duel really took place on a ledge above the water near Weehawken. This isolated spot was foolproof for illegal acts like this. Hamilton ends up dying because of Burr. Burr shot him from a distance. The bullet hit a rib and then ricocheted off into his spine mortally wounding Hamilton. Hamilton was the one that chose the position and the weapons for the duel, but the public thought that Burr killed him in cold blood. The public also started to call Burr the new Benedict Arnold. (Benedict Arnold was considered a traitor.) Burr was never harmed in the whole incident. Because everyone thought Burr was the initiator, he had to leave the city and this was the decline of his political power. Both of these men’s reputations were failing by 1804. Hamilton was appointed the first Secretary of Treasury under George Washington after the Revolutionary War. The Federalist Party was in decline and Hamilton did not hold office for approximately ten years. Burr lost the support

There were several issues in which the founding brothers found themselves on opposite sides of an issue. In the case of Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton, Hamilton had questioned Burr’s qualifications in Burr’s run for

In the battle between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton was one of the most famous duels in the early 19th century. Both men were very significant political leaders of the United States. The men had clashes throughout the 1790’s which lead to a duel between the two and Alexander Hamilton lost his life.

After the colonies gained independence, the founding fathers soon found that becoming a new independent nation was going to be a difficult task. The biggest task was deciding on the division of power in the government. This issue divided the people into two groups, the federalists and the Jeffersonian republicans. Alexander Hamilton led the federalists and Thomas Jefferson led the republicans. These two important men in history would later show how the challenges of becoming a new nation. In this essay I will be analyzing the ideas of Linda K. Kerber’s “The Fears of the Federalists,” to Drew R. McCoy’s “The Fears of the Jeffersonian Republicans.” Furthermore, comparisons will be made about both essays to gain a better understanding of the struggles of government in early America.

Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr were similar and different in multiple ways. The course of events shaped their lives in various ways and they were always competing with each other. The duel between Hamilton and Burr transpired for countless reasons such as family backgrounds, personal careers, and political goals.

He lost in 1796 to John Adams, defecting to the vice president position. While his first run at president was uneventful, the election of 1800 was one of the most controversial in United States history. Thomas Jefferson ran against fellow Democratic-Republican Aaron Burr. Miraculously, in an unprecedented decision, the vote was a tie. The House of Representatives was asked to break the draw, of which Alexander Hamilton, a firm Federalist, was the deciding vote. Although he often opposed Jefferson in many political stances, Hamilton cast his vote for Thomas. Burr—even though he had been campaigning against Jefferson—became the vice president. Later, Vice President Burr shot and killed Hamilton over more political discrepancies.

I think authors of the anti-Federalists essays withheld their identities because they were afraid of the backlash they would receive from individuals. Majority of the nation favored an increase in the national government and to be on the opposite spectrum they wanted to speak anonymously. Authors of the Federalist Papers included their names with their essays because they were speaking out for something that was popular at the time. People tend to want to be anonymous when they hold opposite ideas from others because they are fearful of

On July 11, 1804, a bullet from Aaron Burr’s pistol put an end to the life of Alexander Hamilton. However, it did not put an end to Hamilton’s vision for America. In 1806, a twenty-nine year old Kentuckian entered the U.S Senate and breathed life into Hamilton’s vision. His name was Henry Clay. For the next forty years, the man whom Abraham Lincoln called “My beau-ideal of a statesman” to natiously strove to implement a federal economic policy that closely followed

In the late 1700s, the United States had began to split into two factions: Federalists and Antifederalists. Factions are groups of citizens united by a common interest. The reasoning behind the differing views of how the government works across the world was best said by Locke “Men are equal in a natural sense, but society establishes many dimensions that are unequal”. (Barbour and Wright, 2017). In the states, Federalists wanted a strong central government while anti-federalists wanted a weak one. “The Georgians, for example, wanted a strong central authority to provide military protection for their huge, underpopulated state against the Creek Confederacy; Jerseymen and Connecticuters wanted to escape from economic bondage to New York; the Virginians hoped to establish a system which would give that great state its rightful place in the councils of the republic” (Roche, 800). The one thing they agreed on was having George Washington as president. George Washington tried to be a neutral leader of the United States and suggested for the states to stay together rather than divide into factions. “Thomas Jefferson is credited as stating: “North and South will hang together if they have you to hang on””(Jamison, 2016).

n the history of the United States, the Anti-federalists were the individuals who opposed the implementation of a central federal government which would seek to oversee different operations in the country along with the ratification of the constitution. Instead, they advocated that power ought to remain within the hands of the local and state governments. Conversely, the Federalists advocated for a stronger government that would oversee the operations of all states. They also wanted the ratification of the existing constitution in order to help the government in managing its debts along with the tensions that were developing in particular states. The Federalist movement was formed by Alexander Hamilton, and it functioned as the first

When the United States declared itself a sovereign nation, the Articles of Confederation were drafted to serve as the nations first Constitution.Under these Articles, the states held most of the power; but due to an almost absent centralized government, colonists were ill-equipped to deal with such practices as regulating trade both between states and internationally, levying taxes, solving inter-state disputes, negotiating with foreign nations, and most importantly enforcing laws under the current notion of "Congress". Realizing that there were several deficiencies in the current system of self-government, the states appointed delegates to ratify the situation and come up with a way to attain the aforementioned practices they needed to

Despite Hamilton’s opposing beliefs, his attempts to persuade everyone were highly successful, due to the fact that his actions lead to the selection of his bitter, political enemy, Thomas Jefferson, as our nation’s third chief executive, despite the differences they had. Hamilton was able to persuade the House of Representatives to vote for Jefferson over Burr by writing,“From Alexander Hamilton to Harrison Gray Otis.” In this letter, Hamilton elaborates on how choosing Jefferson is the best option because he is the “less evil” between the two of them. However; the outcome of the election affected not only Hamilton’s political career, but his personal life in numerous ways, as well. As far as his political career goes, he lost an immense amount of support from the Federalists.

I'm comparing and contrasting Hamilton and Burr. I think Burr would be Republican today because the party that he belonged to years ago was the Democratic-Republican party founded in 1791. This party became the Democratic Party of today. However the 1791 old party had 3 beliefs Republicanism, Jeffersonian Democracy, and State Rights. 2 out of the 3 makes me say that he is a Republican. The one belief that doesn't apply is the Jeffersonian Democracy because Jefferson wanted to have the president have the last say in any situation. Now Hamilton would be Democratic today because he believed of a loose interpretation of the Constitution. Hamilton believed that anything that wasn't written in the Constitution he could make his own decisions on. Burr on the other hand believed if it wasn't written in the Constitution it has to go back to the individual State Government to decide.

While the anti-Federalists believed the Constitution and formation of a National Government would lead to a monarchy or aristocracy, the Federalists vision of the country supported the belief that a National Government based on the Articles of the Confederation was inadequate to support an ever growing and expanding nation.

Aaron Burr Jr. was an American politician, on the Democratic-Republican Party. He was the third Vice President of the United States, serving during President Thomas Jefferson 's first term. Nearing the end of his term as Vice President, Burr ran for the governorship of New York, but lost. Blaming Hamilton and eager to defend his honor, he challenged Hamilton to a duel. Hamilton accepted, and the face-off took place; it ended when Burr shot Hamilton to death. Burr fled to New York and New Jersey returning to Washington, DC where he completed his term safe from prosecution. The indictments in the case never reached trial, Burr later was charged with treason in a conspiracy regarding capitalization on a possible war with Spain and for trying to separate territories from the United States.