Outcome One is the ability to write in a way that reaches one’s intended audience. That means the author must understand the differences between audiences, genres, and formal versus informal writing. For instance, while writing a movie review, the author assumes the reader has not seen the movie. Therefore, to be able to reach the intended audience, the author must summarize the movie’s plot and specific scenes to familiarize the reader before they reveal why they liked or disliked the film.
Outcome One is important because if one does not take their audience into account, it can produce inconsistencies that lead the audience to be confused on the paper’s intended purpose. A formal paper should address the audience respectfully, and if a writer were to constantly use slang within the piece, it could be regarded as being disrespectful.
…show more content…
Because we were asked to do a formal analysis, I did not need to provide a summary that introduced the film’s plot or specific scene. Instead I went straight into my analysis, “The director uses parallel editing to build suspense, making us believe Ellen’s end is coming quicker than we expected.” I show that I know how to use Outcome One because I do not explain what parallel editing is and I do not introduce Ellen to the audience. Because the paper asks to evaluate the techniques used in the film, neither of those aspects are necessary to construct a successful paper. In this paper, I prove I am aware of my audience by not admitting unnecessary
The final evaluation will be on the author’s diction and language, which compliments the aura of objectivity created through the author’s ethos with informality akin to that of an advertisement.
film analysis to give the audience a better feel for what the character is going through. The director's
I never gave much thought into what it takes to shoot, direct, edit, and complete a motion picture. Sure, it may sound fun, but after this assignment, it felt like a lot of work. There are quite a few specialized groups that put together the films that we enjoy in our movie theatres. No wonder why it takes months and even years to edit a film, these folks are making sure things are done and synced correctly! The following essay will identify information pertaining to film and importance for their audience so the person or persons watching can have an understanding of what it is they are viewing. A story that has no meaning or becomes very confusing in the details that are presented does not make a good film.
The intended audience is the person, or group of people, to whom the author is writing. The intended audience is a key factor to the author’s essay, because it is to whom he wants his essay to be directed as a message towards. We placed a picture of those who were being discriminated against, because the message had not been received of the author writing the essay. Our most important slide was on the thesis. It was absolutely necessary to make this part of our presentation, because it controls the subject matter of the essay and states something significant to the reader. Slides nine had to do with objectivity. This is extremely important, because it proves if the author is credible for his work or not, based on him being biased or unbiased. Slides ten through fifteen were based upon the six elements in the implicit writing of a non-fiction essay. This was an essential part of our presentation, because these qualities are an outline of what readers look for, and what writers should strive to accomplish, in effective
Addresses purpose effectively, uses assignment to explore topic’s intrinsic interest, shows full understanding of issues, engages audience, establishes credibility, uses headings, fo
“ The flashing lights from lightning was the only thing I had to see.”exclaimed Davie. The 1 hour and 30 minute movie was extremely better. To me it felt as if I was able to picture the scene in my mine. Also I could actually see it. The purpose of my paper is to persuade you, the reader to think that the movie is better. “Help… Help… Help. My dad is stuck under a tree. Come quickly!” “What is it?” They were trying their darndest to try and lift the tree. “ There is no hope!” Said one of the men. “ We are putting ourselves in danger. We have to get out of here!” Davie reamed “No I am not leaving until we get my dad.” The guys stopped and turned around. “Fine. Only for you.” That night it didn't stop raining.
When you review various curricular plans, you may see a variety of terms. Some programs use the term “program outcomes” while others use the term “terminal objectives” for those actions that the student is expected to accomplish upon graduation. The same is true for individual courses. Some programs call the knowledge and skills that a student should master by the end of the course “course outcomes” while others use the term “course objectives.” All of the terms have a specified definition in literature and according to accreditation agencies. What are the similarities and differences between the terms according to the literature and to accrediting agencies? Select a program or course (other than GCU) and critique their use of these terms. Do they use them in a manner consistent with the literature and/or accreditation agencies or do they use them differently? Include your review of the program in your response to this discussion question. Support your response with literature. Your critique could be at the program level or at the course level. You do not need to do both levels.
Defined by www.news.artnet.com/, German Expressionism is defined as “an artistic genre that originated in Europe in the 1920s, and is broadly defined as the rejection of Western conventions, and the depiction of reality that is widely distorted for emotional effect.” In Nosferatu, the film contains a plethora of distorted realities in an attempt to evoke the “emotional effect” from the audience. This is shown by the director of the film, F.W. Murnau’s usage of lighting and makeup & costume design.
in the business world. But, there is a major difference between The Goal and the text
Each film has a distinct purpose associated with it. Whether this purpose is as simple as teaching children a valuable lesson or as complex as criticizing a society 's barriers, there are explicit goals which must be discerningly conveyed. There are specific elements to filmmaking which are designed to contribute to the goals set forth when making a film. Such elements include what would be considered "aesthetics of astonishment," or striking images, editing conflict and other techniques associated with montage filmmaking. Each of these techniques imprint a thought or logic on a film a kind of "watermark" that pushes the film itself towards the accomplishment of the original goals. Regardless of the need for the completion of these
Establishing the difference between the story and the plot allows one to determine the effect each element has on the understanding and interpretation of the piece. It also provides a way of tracking the continuation of events and the relationship between seemingly isolated moments in time. Film Art clearly defines both story and plot but acknowledges that there is a significant overlap between the two functions and allows a flow within the film. The plot is the presentation of the events, in chronological order and includes the events that are seen, inferred and assumed by the viewer as opposed to the story. The story refers to the way in which the plot is presented, the ‘personality’ imposed
Regardless of the object being reviewed, there are a number of essential features of writing a review at a professional standard. This essay will examine each of those features with reference to two reviews of films which explore a specific theme.
Understanding movies comes from describing and analyzing the cinematic, theatrical, and literary elements that combine to create meaning. These steps create a basic understanding of the artistic and technical elements found in moviemaking. In addition, the major characteristics of different film genres and classic movies will be analyzed. The purpose of this paper is analyzing the Academy Award winning film Chicago. This paper will describe the six steps that a person should think about when watching a movie. These steps include, (1) analysis of the narrative: story, plot and meaning; (2) theatrical elements, (3) cinematography, (4) editing, (5) sound and the (6) complete package.
The paper I decided to do was on “Schindler’s List”. I have seen this movie four times and yet had not really noticed the many ways in which the director, Steven Spielberg, used the camera to emphasis a “million words”. It was interesting, when watching this film from this stand point, how I was able to see the importance of the way the director uses sounds and color to make some much significant points of a film.
Analysis of the Way in Which the Director Has Brought the Film to a Satisfying Conclusion