Ns The National Security Agency

The threat of terrorism creates a fear that allows government agencies to subvert the United States Constitution and common morals out of the threat that they will be unable to combat terrorism without performing these rights violations. After the attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C. on September 11th, 2001, the United States Congress passed the USA PATRIOT (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) Act (“NSA Surveillance Programs”). This act essentially gives a blank check of domestic and foreign rights violations to the federal government, specifically the National Security Agency, as long as the violation is done in the name of fighting terrorism. Reports came out numerous times over the next decade, specifically December 2005, May 2006, and March 2012, detailing how the National Security Agency was able to stretch its powers, even beyond this liberal and controversial bill, to surveil its citizens’ private phone conversations with neither warrants nor provable suspicion of a crime taking or about to take place (“NSA Surveillance Programs”). The former of these reports was by the New York Times, which had known for nearly a year about this program but

With the establishment of the US Patriot Act, the government has been granted the ability to tap into phone lines without the knowledge of or notification to the owner of the line. I have personally been effected by this on a local level due to a high political case my ex-husband was involved in with his former employer. The local government tapped into all of our phone lines and recorded a lot of information from conversations and text messages that I personally had with my ex-husband and conversations he had with his former employer. We did not know that our phones were tapped until they presented the transcripts in court. Granted, none of the information provided was incriminating in any nature, but the fact that our constitutional right was invaded was just beyond mind blowing.

The United States government’s interpretation of the Fourth Amendment has caused them to believe they are justified in amassing a collection of American phone records, which creates a breach in many American citizens’ privacy. According to the FISA Amendment Act, the government has the authority to “target foreigners abroad” (ACLU) and the phone records of any communications between Americans and those foreign targets can be collected. However, this act does not allow amassing

We use technology every day, all day, for pretty much everything we do. Any information about ourselves, messages we send, or phone calls we make, it all takes place on our phones. However, they are also the biggest risk to our personal security as they are very vulnerable. They are not just vulnerable to scammers and hackers but also to our own government. Following the attacks of September 11, 2001, the president at the time, George Bush, responded by passing an act. This act is known as the Patriot Act. It allows the government unlimited access to phone records, emails, and text messages without a warrant through National Security Letters and Sneak and Peak Searches. Why do they do this, why was this act passed, they claim it’s for our safety. Both can be obtained and carried out without a judge’s approval, without a warrant, and without the knowledge of the person who is being searched. The Fourth Amendment is the right of the citizens to legal and just searches, with a warrant, with probable cause. These are not required under the Patriot Act to search through call histories and messages. The Patriot Act clearly infringes on the Fourth Amendment and the rights of the everyday citizen and does not accomplish its original goal of stopping terrorism.

“After years of denial, much of which likely constituted perjury, officials of the National Security Agency (NSA) admitted to having conducted unwarranted surveillance of Americans, a violation of the protections against such searches provided by the Fourth Amendment.” "NSA Admits Directly Targeting Americans for Warrantless Surveillance." NSA Admits Directly Targeting Americans for Warrantless Surveillance. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. The NSA abuses their power by going to the extreme and spying on innocent citizens warrantless. It isn’t fair to the society. The NSA shouldn’t be able to view anyone’s personal information without a warrant. With or without a warrant, The NSA should still have certain rules that will create boundaries. President Obama and the National Security Chief stated that they do not monitor the communications of

Every move you make on the Internet can be recorded step by step, website to website. While researching articles on internet surveillance one said how US government has been forcing American telecommunication companies to turn over the call records of every one of their customers to allow the NSA to search them with a reason.(Glenn Greenwald. NSA collecting phone…). However I find this completely wrong, the government shouldn’t be having our call records unless they have some sort of evidence that we are a suspect or threat to this country. It also mentioned how the “NSA believes this general monitoring of our electronic communications is justified because the entire process takes a small amount of seconds”.(Glenn Greenwald. NSA collecting phone…). Despite the general illusion that today’s surveillance technology is used for a good purpose, people should be aware of the consequences when it’s used in the wrong

The article explains the faultiness of the act, which it provides more than necessary coverage of American privacy online. It says, “The Procedures allow the government to keep and analyze even purely domestic communications if they contain significant foreign intelligence information, evidence of a crime, or encrypted information. Again, foreign intelligence information is defined exceedingly broadly. The result is that the NSA is steadily building a database of Americans' purely domestic calls and emails.” The lack of directness of what is considered “foreign intelligence information” puts Americans’ privacy at risk and they wouldn’t even know it. If the government had a search warrant to collect those calls, the specific American would know they were being listened too and could fight for their privacy. The article goes on to

Before the Obama Administration was in charge of secretly collecting phone records and accessed the internet activity of many, there was the Bush Administration. In late 2005, President George W. Bush authorized the National Security Agency. With this organization, they are able to monitor phone calls and emails without court permission. Just a year later, public support for the

One of the National Security Agency’s top goals, is to prevent future terrorist attacks. Since its passage following the September 11, 2001 attacks, the Patriot Act has played a key role in many successful operations to prevent and to protect innocent Americans from the deadly plans of terrorists dedicated to destroying America. However great results from passing the Patriot Act, Congress allowed, slow and small changes in the law. But what ended up happening was a huge movement and netting of survelliance and wire taps around the country. People felt as though their rights were being violated. Congress had only taken existing legal guidelines and reestablished them to protect the lives and liberty of the people in the United States of America from the challenges posed by a global terrorist network(NBC News). That is why the NSA should be allowed to break our constitutional privacy. Yet that is only if the security and the well-being of the United states is threatened, if our allies and members of our own country join those making threats against us, and when it is made clear that our national security has been broken down and

Under George W. Bush’s term, and shortly after the attacks of September 11th 2001, both the President’s Surveillance Program and the Terrorist Surveillance Program have been brought under scrutiny. Each of the programs authorizes the National Security Agency (NSA) by executive order to monitor phone calls,

You’re constantly being watched, the NSA collect the data from over 75,000 people daily. The NSA, or National Security Agency, is responsible for collecting and monitoring all this data that they gather. They collect all this data to help the government as they are a government agency. They truly do help the United States by monitoring this data to help protect the citizens, but still people find a way to oppose it. Even though it might violate people 's right to privacy, the NSA helps protect citizens with their ability to collect and search through large amounts of data, and using this information from to prevent possible attacks on the United states from actually happening.

Edward Snowden’s disclosures have brought to light many secret government actions that were previously unknown. One of the most controversial government programs that Snowden disclosed was how the National Security Agency (NSA) collected virtually every phone record for calls made in the United States between US citizens. It makes sense to monitor phone calls to or from callers located outside the United States, because non-US citizens don 't have the protection of the US Constitution and monitoring these calls also might be helpful in identifying foreigners who might be plotting terrorist attacks in the US. However, US citizens have 4th Amendment privacy rights under the Constitution, so it is much more of a problem when the US government collects bulk information about US citizens who do not pose an obvious danger to the country.

Firstly, Many Americans think that the NSA spying program is unconstitutional, but they are wrong. Our founding fathers and Abraham lincoln's teachings are even stronger when applies to the NSA’s surveillance program violates no constitutional provision. The National Review said “It examines only the addressee and sender emails, and telephone numbers called and called from. The supreme court has long held that such information is

1) In regards to question number one involving if we - as societal citizens - have a Natural Right to Privacy, I believe the answer is no - due to understanding equivocal terminology. For example, we all know that the National Security Agency (NSA), The Law Enforcement Community (LE), and the Intelligence Community (IC), all routinely collect information on us - on a daily basis. Such information involving: emails, video and voice chats, videos, photos, Voiceover Internet Protocols [e.g. Skype, Google Chrome, Oovoo, Teamspeak, & etc], file transfers, retail products [e.g. Home Security Cameras & Home Thermostats] and social networking sites; including but not limited to soliciting the following information to second and third party vendors [e.g. private companies & contractors]. With that being said, we are now living in an institutionalized society - where privacy is null and void.

In the article “Surveillance of Phone Calls is Troubling” (2013), the author explains that Verizon customers in the United States who have shown no indication of terrorism are being spied upon by the Nation Security Agency (NSA), which should a cause for great concern. It was revealed that the NSA and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) are obtaining data from internet companies, emails, extracting audio, videos, and other documents to help analysts track a person’s movements and contacts. Authorities are presented with information such as telephone numbers, length of phone calls, the calling card number used, or a phone’s unique identification number. While this kind of information is given, the government is not permitted to listen to