Nuclear Bomb Argument Analysis

In today’s society people must consider the possible devastation a major war could bring to the world and society as a whole. Throughout history the US has successfully avenged threats made to our nation, homes, and citizens but, what if the menace becomes mass destruction? According to Johan Galtung, the author of On the Social and Cultural Implications of Nuclear War, a war with such ambivalent outcomes would produce a more broken world, stating, “We live already, to a large extent, in a world of wounded nations, wounded by insults suffered in the past or at least perceived as such. A nuclear attack would add to the insults, deepening old traumas, imprinting nations with the new ones,” (Galtung). The government has made the nation aware of weapons of mass destruction and the possibility of a nuclear war for many years, and it is still one of the major topics brought up today. As a society we are unable to control the weapons themselves but, we face the menace of a nuclear war and situations like Hiroshima on our homeland. Analyzing situations from the past that contained the threat of nuclear peril can enlighten today’s society to possible solutions for this problem, while current situations like the possible conquest of Kim Jong Un exposes the weakness of how unprepared the US is for a nuclear war. Using the past, the three sociological perspectives, and understanding the possibility of a war in the future, analysis of the problems a

Daisaku Ikeda, a spiritual leader for Japan once commented, ‘Japan learned from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that tragedy wrought by nuclear weapons must never be repeated and that humanity and nuclear weapons cannot coexist.’ The world has experienced the bombings of Japan, of Pearl Harbor and the conflict of the Cold War, but even with these conflicts present in our history, warning us of the effects, these meaning have not carried through into society today. Currently in the Middle East, we are witnessing the elements of a modern day cold war starting to appear. Israel and Iran have been in arguments and disagreements about nuclear weaponry since 2012. Their different religious view and ideologies has flourished into more than a religious tension but that of a modern day cold way.

Now is the time to use the power of American diplomacy to pressure Iran to stop their illicit nuclear program, support for terrorism, and threats toward Israel. Obama and Biden will offer the Iranian regime a choice. If Iran abandons its nuclear program and support for terrorism, we will offer incentives like membership in the World Trade Organization, economic investments, and a move toward normal diplomatic relations. If Iran continues its troubling behavior, we will step up our economic pressure and political isolation. In carrying out this diplomacy, we will coordinate closely with our allies and proceed with careful preparation. Seeking this kind of comprehensive settlement with Iran is our best way to make

In the article Argument Supporting the Bomb, by Michael Barnes, the general thesis was that the atomic bomb was necessary. Throughout the article there are many propaganda techniques used to convince the reader. For example, techniques like transferring the blame, lesser of the two evils, and card stacking are used throughout the article. For instance, in the article the author uses the fact that the Japanese attacked the United States first: “the back-stabbing” aspect of the “surprise” attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941”. The transfer technique is used here to distract the reader, and make them think about Pearl Harbour. As a result the reader overlooks the fact that the atomic bomb killed more than a hundred thousand citizens. Not

The article, written by David Sanger and Michael Gordon from The New York Times on August 23, highlights main controversies about Iran-US nuclear agreement. After months of negotiations between USA and Iran, the deal is waiting to be approved by Congress. However, there are many points of debate regarding the approval of this pact. The main point of polemic is the capacity of Iran to produce nuclear weapons after 15 years, when the agreement is supposed to end. Many people, like the Democrat Representative Adam B. Schiff from California, agree Iran would “have a highly modern and internationally legitimized enrichment capability” (Gordon & Sanger, 2015). Others argue in favor of the agreement because, as R. Nicholas Burns, undersecretary of

enemies to scare them into not continuing the battles that they are taking place in. They rhetorically strategized to scare the enemies into thinking that they were not bluffing and would use the weapons if the task presented itself. Bush even said that even if matters did go worse that he still most likely would not have used the nuclear weapons that he possessed. Also the statement made that if a president looks at using nuclear weapons lightly that it should be an embarrassment to them shows that even when they threaten using these weapons they are most likely bluffing. It appears that as time goes by people do not want nuclear weapons around especially our president. He also sees the huge damage that it can cause and is also trying to make it impossible for Iran to obtain these weapons as he is also working on trying to remove our nuclear weapons from Europe and other parts to not have the option of obtaining nuclear weapons in the future. This matter is super important for Americans to know about because nuclear weapons can be very catastrophic if they are used, especially by an enemy to the United States. The questions that need to be asked are is there ever going to be an end to nuclear weapons? Will we ever find the peace and security that Bush talks about? Will there

On August 6, 1945, 80,000 people died within seconds. On August 9, 1945, another 40,000 people died within the blink of an eye. It is said that after the sudden flash of light that was brighter than the sun, their shadows were literally burned into the sidewalks, buildings and streets they were roaming. Tens of thousands of the remaining survivors would later parish due to radiation exposure. What might've caused so many deaths, you may ask? Two life threatening weapons composed of half a dime's weight of nuclear fission uranium 235 and plutonium, better known as "Little Boy" and "Fat Man." These were the first atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan by the United States of America.

Fellow citizens of the United States I have come to the conclusion that we will be dropping the bomb on Japan. After long nights of deciding what action must be taken to end World War 2 I’ve come to realize that the lives of our country are in my hand. The Japanese military command has rejected the request for unconditional surrender. So we must take action into our own matters. In order to Prevents American citizens from losing their lives; we shall destroy their docks, their factories, and their communications. Let there be no mistake; we shall completely destroy Japan's power to make war. Plus let me inform you all Germans are working hard to find a way to add atomic energy to the other engines of war with which they hoped to enslave the world. I will not risk the fact that they could bomb us first. It’s crucial for us to drop this bomb in order to make Germany lose all their resources to develop an atomic bomb and use it against us.

I am writing to you in reference to the current national debate regarding the safety of the Iran Nuclear Deal. Since the conclusion of World War II, a primary goal of US foreign policy has been nuclear deterrence. However, the inevitability of technological advancement, has resulted in the production and perfection of a powerful nuclear armament by nine different nations. The US and our allies, have worked tirelessly to prevent the continued proliferation of nuclear weapons—primarily attempting to prevent countries such as Iran from procuring this technology. Under the Obama administration, the US engaged in extensive negotiations, which culminated with the ratification of the Iran Nuclear Deal in the summer of 2015. In short, this Deal lifts

American forces dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 and the second on Nagasaki three days later. I believe Truman was justified in this decision, as it aided in the surrender of Japanese forces with the lowest cost to human lives thus ending World War II.

to start with subheading, disassembling atomic weapons; be that as it may, before expressing their

As you are all too aware, the United States and its Allies have faced troubles in the Middle East for many decades. Much of this is due to well-funded and well-protected terrorists operating in the region under the protective umbrella of participating countries, including Iran. Understandably, the thought of a nuclear capable Iran is terrifying to many of you. I wish to propose a different option than the current economic sanctions that have been taking place, one in which Iran becomes both more powerful and aligns it’s views with that of the United States.

Ever since nuclear weapons were invented, the world has been strict about their usage and manufacturing. USA, having the most number of operational nuclear warheads (Macais) has been most vocal about who should can manufacture and store nuclear weapons. But one should not forget that there has only been one recorded incident of nuclear weapons being used in combat and that was when USA dropped 2 of its nuclear bombs on Japan, one in Nagasaki and one in Hiroshima.

The Iranian nuclear project has been certain since its inception with the new regime, and Iran has one specific objective to achieve, it is to produce a nuclear bomb. Iran 's leadership has fully convinced that the quest to build Iran as the leader at the regional level will not be achieved without having a military nuclear capability. Iran is considered to have a nuclear weapon is very important in Iranian strategy based on the adoption of the fierce policy of intervention in the affairs of the regional countries and expanding the circle of influence. The Shah 's dream before his fall is the same as the dream of velayat-e faqih at the current time, which the Iranian regime coveted in controlling over the most of the countries of the region. As a part of the Iranian strategy is launching public threats which confirms Iran 's diverse capabilities and potential to inflict great damages in any of the countries in the region that dare to threaten or challenge its interests. Iran used the media as an element of national power by continuous launching news of achieving big successes in the development of weapons and military equipment and the growth of military capabilities that will be used to punish enemies To spread fear and terror in the region. It turned out the Iranian regime continues to pursue an expansionist policy in the region after the completion of the nuclear agreement, Iran caused in escalating the

This paper will show that the US and its allies should take a more Hard Power approach when it comes to nuclear program of Iran. The paper will show how Iran cannot be trusted, due to its history of braking its word, and how the deals that we have made so far shows that the world is giving them the ability to create nuclear weapons. Also I will show how the resent agreements mad heave not done enough to stop Iran from gaining nuclear weapons.