Nuclear Energy Source For New Jersey

Energy is an important part of life producing the power of movement, heat, and production of electricity in many different ways. Therefore, choosing the correct source of energy is important for the environment and humans. Renewable energy that produces electricity never runs out, causing a lower environmental impact. Solar, Biomass, Wind, Geothermal, and Hydropower energy should be used globally to produce electricity. On the other hand, producing electricity from nonrenewable energy sources can be very harmful to humans and the environment. Humans can easily be dependent on it, which may not be the best option when it comes to finance, efficiency, sustainability and more. Approximately 52% of the US electricity comes from polluting sources like natural gas, oil, nuclear, and hydropower that have a lot of disadvantages effecting the environment in a negative way.

Firstly, the atomic incidents of Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania and Chernobyl in Russia are often mentioned as examples for nuclear plants being unsafe. In both cases failures of workers led to a meltdown in the reactors and increased radiation in the surrounding area (Henderson 12-17). And as the recent disaster in Japan shows, a nuclear crisis cannot only be caused by human mishaps, but also by unpredictable and untamable natural hazards. Consequently, nuclear crises cannot be predicted or prevented completely. Nuclear plants are, furthermore, considered uneconomical because in the eighties the construction costs of nuclear plants were underestimated and exceeded the estimation by $100 billion (Henderson 103). Therefore, the nuclear power opponents are arguing that nuclear power is burdening the American economy unnecessarily. According to the nuclear physicist Jeff Eerkens, antinuclear groups are also claiming that nuclear power is not necessary for the future since renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power will be providing sufficient energy for the United States, and are at the same time much cheaper than the costly nuclear power plants (Eerkens 20). Over all, opponents consider nuclear power to risky and inefficient to “deserve further support from U.S. taxpayers” (Henderson 104).

To many times people talk about the negative side of nuclear energy, and how it can impact the environment around them, but too few talk about how nuclear energy had improved their lives. In truth nuclear energy is responsible for creating a fair amount of revenue in the local economy, state revenue, and federal revenue. For every dollar a nuclear power plant spends it generates an estimated 1.04 in the community, 1.18 in the state, and a 1.87 for the nation (Nuclear Energy Institute). With such a great revenue it would be detrimental to the nation if nuclear energy was disbanded, and deemed a great threat to national security. Nuclear energy generates roughly $16 million dollars annually for the state it resides in, and about $67 million dollars annually for the nation (Nuclear Energy Institute). That revenue generated for the state is used for the construction of new schools, improved state wide emergency response training and response times, and a whole multitude of things that just can’t compare. To add to this nuclear

75% of all electricity used in France is supplied by the clean, pollution-free energy source of nuclear power (Newsela, 2). However, most of the United State’s energy is created from burning fossil fuels that pollute our atmosphere, contribute to global warming, and thus threaten the future of our planet. Nuclear power should be used more in the United States to create clean power that doesn’t pollute our environment, in order to help combat climate change.

Throughout this world, we use various equipment that need certain energy requirements in order for them to run properly. Two of the utmost imperative sources of energy in our world today come from coal and nuclear power. Still, a great deal of citizens of this world are unaware of the impacts of nuclear power whether it be positive or negative due to the fact that nuclear power has not existed as long as coal power has. However, as nuclear power becomes a major resource of energy, we as citizens must determine which is more fitting for not only us, but our environment. As this report continues on, you will come to find the history of each of these resources along with the advantages and disadvantages of each. Concluded from this research was the concept that nuclear power is worthier for America as a whole. Included below are the specific points as to why nuclear power is far superior for American citizens and our environment. However, the main notion to be taken from this report is the view that we need to become further educated on the energy resources present in this world and be able to determine how we can become more efficient and contribute less to climate change in the long run.

Nuclear power is a much greener option than others, and can help prevent the devastating effects of fossil fuels on the environment. Burning fossil fuels releases thousands of tons of GHGs (greenhouse gasses) into the air that cause a variety of serious environmental problems. The emissions cause global warming which leads to the melting of polar ice caps and the raising of oceans. This also causes acid rain and air pollution which pollutes water sources, accelerates erosion and damages ecosystems (Pacific

Nuclear Energy has many proponents and much opposition. Many of the groups that oppose nuclear power have legitimate concerns, mainly with the dangers of nuclear material in relation with human health concerns and environmental troubles that are risked by allowing nuclear power plants to increase in number. Yet, many of these opposition groups have made outspoken and radical claims about the “hidden” motives of why nuclear power is promoted and subsidized by our federal government. For example, The Nuclear Information and Resource Service claim that the federal government has the intention of committing genocide against Native Americans because uranium mining is predominantly done on reservations. Another cry out by nuclear

Nuclear processes should not be used to generate energy in California . Nuclear energy is the energy that is released during the fission or fusion of nuclei of Uranium. Major accidents in nuclear power plants resulting in radiation pollution is very dangerous and can easily affect many lives and up to three generations. Furthermore, with the knowledge that many people can easily get hurt from one incident, nuclear plants are attractive for terrorists whose goal is to hurt as many people possible in the shortest amount of time. Additionally, spent fuel from nuclear power plants remain harmful for thousands of years, (Kelly Kissock, 2017). On the other hand, research has shown that nuclear energy can decrease global warming and climate change.

Society is always looking for alternative ways to meet our energy needs. Fifty percent of New Jersey’s energy comes from three Nuclear Power Plants. The other fifty percent comes from fossil fuels, which are contributing factors to climate change. Nuclear energy is the best choice as an alternative source of energy. Both nuclear and renewable energy share one thing in common and that is they both polluted the Earth. Yes, having only renewable energy would benefit us due to the fact that it has a continual source of energy but developmental costs would increase drastically. Having only nuclear energy as a source of energy, it would produce gas emissions during the build up of electricity as compared to traditional sources like coal power plants. Nuclear energy allows us to have a low pollution rate, low budgeting cost, and a more efficient source of energy.

Today, nuclear fission produces 70% of the zero-carbon electricity used in the United States. In the face of the increasing effects of climate change, scientists and some environmental activists are calling for a “nuclear renaissance” in the United States. Yet, with just a few nuclear reactors under construction—compared with more than two-dozen in China—there is no evidence that such a nuclear revival is in the making. Instead, recent years have seen some nuclear plants forced to close and dozens more facing early retirement

Unlike fossil fuels, nuclear energy has the lowest impact on the environment since it does not release any gases like carbon dioxide, methane which are largely responsible for

Nuclear power has been slow to become a mainstream source of electricity in the world. Despite the fact that Nuclear power is arguably the most capable source of continuous, clean energy; the industry has been held back by safety and financial concerns. Current nuclear power plants, so-called Generation II reactors, are currently the largest source of carbon free electricity in the United States according to the Department of Energy (DoE).

The world's natural resources are being consumed at an alarming rate. As these resources diminish, people will be seeking alternative sources by which to generate electricity for heat and light. The only practical short-term solution for the energy/pollution crisis should be nuclear power because it is available, cleaner and safer.

Nuclear Energy is one of the most accomplished and efficient forms of energy. It produces more energy than coal, geothermal energy, solar energy, and many other energies, making it very powerful. The main energy that it produces is electricity. It produces its main energy without greenhouse gas emissions. Most important of all, it produces its electricity without pollution. Therefore, making it one of the cleanest forms of energy production.

Nuclear power has been around for decades and can be easily utilized to help meet America’s energy needs. With energy