Nuclear Power Provides Materials For Dirty Bombs

An example of the environmental success nuclear energy has provided is France in the 1970s and 1980s. The country switched from using fossil fuels and instead used nuclear energy to supply 78% of its electricity (see figure 3). This in turn lowered the country’s greenhouse emissions by approximately 2% each year since. No accidents have ever occurred at any of France's power plants (Biello, 2013).

Firstly, the usage of nuclear power is consistent and plentiful. As we know, the reaction of nuclear can emit a great power of energy, it can support vast of families’ and enormous plants’ working. In addition, unlike solar energy and wind power, which depend on external factors, nuclear power is consistent generate at anytime and anywhere. Secondly, since the nuclear power is easy to produce and it also can generate a huge amount of power, it is much cheaper to use it. What’s more, like Hill’s saying, “with the cost of natural gas and oil soaring”, the nuclear plants have return back to work and produce massive energy. Lastly, nuclear power benefits to environment: not only because it does not produce the carbon emissions, which can alleviates the global warming; but also it reduces the noxious byproducts, like sulfur dioxide, which is main reason of air pollution. Therefore, using the nuclear power is an ideal energy resource for human

Nuclear power is a much greener option than others, and can help prevent the devastating effects of fossil fuels on the environment. Burning fossil fuels releases thousands of tons of GHGs (greenhouse gasses) into the air that cause a variety of serious environmental problems. The emissions cause global warming which leads to the melting of polar ice caps and the raising of oceans. This also causes acid rain and air pollution which pollutes water sources, accelerates erosion and damages ecosystems (Pacific

There are currently an estimated 15,000 nuclear warheads on the planet, the United States has 6,800, Russia has 7,000, the United Kingdom has 215, France has 300, China has 260, India has between 110-120, Pakistan has between 120-130, Israel has 80 and North Korea has less than 10. Too most the biggest concern countries in this list are North Korean and Pakistan, however any one of these countries could elect a leader (or be taken over) by a government that is not hesitant to use nuclear bombs to solve problems. The United States and Russia could “ignite” into another cold or hot war. Israel could decide it needs to use its nuclear warheads to defend itself from its neighbors. Even France could be fed up of all the World War 2 surrender jokes and decide to retaliate. Obviously, some of those situations are far and wide distant worries, but when a nuclear warhead has the power to completely decimate a city and its surrounding areas, even the most far-fetched situations should be considered. However, there are some countries that do drive legitimate worries about potentially using their nuclear warheads aggressively and those are the countries that should be given hard concern. The cold war offered stability between the U.S.A. And the

Some may say that nuclear energy is bad solely based off of what they know about the infamous Chernobyl. However, Chernobyl should never have happened. In a rush to provide power and test nuclear energy, the Soviets made a poorly built excuse for a nuclear power plant. Due to human error and lack of a containment center, Chernobyl was an exception to a rather safe way of producing energy.

A nuclear weapon is “an explosive device whose destructive potential derives from the release of energy that accompanies the splitting or combining of atomic nuclei.” (dictionary.com). There are two types of nuclear explosives. One is fission, and the other is a combination of fission and fusion. Countries having nuclear weapons may cause the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the world. What’s more, it can also result in potential danger if they are taken advantage of by terrorists one day. In my opinion, nuclear weapons are dangerous for human society. No country in the world should have these harmful weapons.

Chernobyl, Fukushima and Three Mile Island — all known as major nuclear power disasters. Nuclear power might be a good source of power, but in the long run it can be a real hazard and should be banned. If we rely on nuclear power to be our primary power source, it will cause major problems to humans and the environment. Nuclear power is hard to dispose of, expensive to run, and the reactors can easily be disrupted and cause the release of massive amounts of radiation.

Storing nuclear waste is a political problem as no one wants it stored near them, so there is a dispute about where radioactive waste should be stored. But after all the advantages of using nuclear energy outweigh its disadvantages as nuclear plants emit less than one-hundredth of carbon dioxide gas compared to coal or gas-fired energy plants so there is a very little effect on the environment. Humans living next to coal-fired power plants are exposed to higher radiation doses than those living near nuclear plants, where the former is harmful to human health and may be responsible for acid rain. On the other hand dependence on nuclear energy is now increasing in most countries as nuclear reactors use uranium as a fuel which is found everywhere on earth. It is inexpensive and easier to transport than other fuels which makes them less dependent on oil and foreign fuel from other countries.

In 2013, a study conducted by NASA shows that nuclear energy has “prevented 1.84 million deaths from 1971 to 2009 with an average of 79,000 deaths (prevented)/ year from 2000 to 2009 (Kharecha and Hansen, 3). Even if one were to include the death tolls from both Chernobyl and Fukushima, nuclear energy ranks last in death per unit generated per year (see fig. 2). And although nuclear waste is toxic and harmful to humans (as it can cause cancer and death), it is usually stored in a safe location away from other resources and most importantly, away from humans. On the other hand, the toxic byproducts of fossil fuels are being released into the air every day. And by reducing the amount of fossil fuels burned, countless cases of cancer and lung disease as well as coal mining accidents have been avoided. For as long as nations use fossil fuels, nuclear energy saves much more lives than it

Another reason why nuclear power is bad, it can be used to create nuclear weapons. nuclear power can be turn into nuclear weapon. In Article 3 in the last paragraph states “In the same way U.S nuclear power plants have not eliminated the threat of nuclear weapons despite 20 years.” Just because we have not seen nuclear weapons in the past 20 years does not mean that they can not make a comeback. Moreover, “Spent fuel, if not disposed of properly could contaminate water supplies or be used by terrorist to create a dirty bomb”(1,8). Terrorist could use this against us causing a lot of damage. Lately with all the craziness happening around us it will not be the best decision.

Nuclear plants gives a country the ability to create material that could be used for nuclear weapons that could bring about mass destructions were ever they are detonated. Such weapons give an upper hand to countries that have them. This imbalance of power around the world could lead to wars that could kill and vaporize thousands of people. An example is the use of such weapon at the end of World War II by USA on cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Killing people with such weapons is an immoral act, as civilians are not guilty for the act of their government, and are defenseless against such

There are currently 61 nuclear plants in the united states and that is dangerous to us and our wildlife. What if one day we were going to have a earthquake and the tubs where they keep their chemicals broke. What would we do? What would happen to all the animals that died of radiation? What would happen if our drinking water gets contaminated? Theses are things we should have thought about before we put over half a hundred dangerous plants in our nation. Nuclear plants just don't have an effect on the environment they also have an effect on civilization. They way they affect society is a nuclear power and war. With today's amazing technology we have created nuclear bombs that can wipe out whole world out, that can kill almost everything on our planet with just a push of a button. We humans have made something so powerful we use it has a weapon and use to blackmail other countries. North Korea has used their powerful nuclear bombs as a threat for a long

Pollution is another topic with both pros and cons. Fossil fuels release harmful pollutants into the air such as carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Nuclear power does not release any of those toxins into the atmosphere. However, a pollution problem with nuclear energy is thermal pollution, where a plant’s “hot effluents” are put into a nearby body of water, and raise the temperature by a small amount but enough to cause a disturbance in the ecosystem of the lake or reservoir. Nevertheless, this could easily be solved by cooling the effluents before releasing them into the water. The other problem facing nuclear energy is waste disposal. Nuclear waste is radioactive and very dangerous. Therefore, it must be kept buried and sealed up for a long period of time until the radioactivity dies [Plasma-Material]. One positive fact about nuclear energy that is not disputed is its abundance.

Nuclear weapons tend to get a bad rap most of the time. Nuclear weapons have been the cause of some of the most catastrophic events in history. However, nuclear weapons have protected the United States throughout many wars fought in the past. There are always horrific aftermaths when it comes to nuclear weapons and it results in terrible affects within the atmosphere, misunderstood country relations, and trust. Nuclear weapons are used as precautions when it comes to war and protecting our country, but nuclear weapons have done more harm to our world than good.

The risk that comes with nuclear weapons is that the lack of morals. Nuclear weapons in wrong hands can be dangerous. Such as Iran. Iran is a nuclear threshold state. Iran claimed to wipe Israel off the map. Iran’s supreme leader predicted that Israel would not exist in 25 years. Iran seeks to build and even use nuclear weapons to stabilize, and to kill Americans and Israelis. Iran foments terrorism around the world. Look in the history of terrorism, on 9/11