Nuclear War Research Paper

In today’s society people must consider the possible devastation a major war could bring to the world and society as a whole. Throughout history the US has successfully avenged threats made to our nation, homes, and citizens but, what if the menace becomes mass destruction? According to Johan Galtung, the author of On the Social and Cultural Implications of Nuclear War, a war with such ambivalent outcomes would produce a more broken world, stating, “We live already, to a large extent, in a world of wounded nations, wounded by insults suffered in the past or at least perceived as such. A nuclear attack would add to the insults, deepening old traumas, imprinting nations with the new ones,” (Galtung). The government has made the nation aware of weapons of mass destruction and the possibility of a nuclear war for many years, and it is still one of the major topics brought up today. As a society we are unable to control the weapons themselves but, we face the menace of a nuclear war and situations like Hiroshima on our homeland. Analyzing situations from the past that contained the threat of nuclear peril can enlighten today’s society to possible solutions for this problem, while current situations like the possible conquest of Kim Jong Un exposes the weakness of how unprepared the US is for a nuclear war. Using the past, the three sociological perspectives, and understanding the possibility of a war in the future, analysis of the problems a

“All classes of individuals … have flown to the standard, with the determination of supporting their national character, and defending their country from the unhallowed

That it would be injustice to order them on duty of any kind, Recreation of a garrison life to give opportunity to recover. “The right of each state to order and control its own domestic institution according to its own judgment exclusively. That the balance of power on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depend.” They have the right to do whatever needs to be done to help their government. The have no oath to destroy their government, but protect, preserve and defend their government. Help their government

August 6, 1945. The day the world and warfare were changed forever. After the first nuclear warhead was dropped, humanity was, and will forever be on the brink of destruction. A single press of a button could end humanity as we know it, bringing total chaos and destruction to the earth. Nuclear weapons are considered to show the power of a country, have nearly been set off due to a false alarm, nuclear weapons are vulnerable to cyberterrorism, and if set off will surely bring an end to the world as we know it.

There were many impacts of the nuclear arms race. Some we're positive, and some were negative. The nuclear arms race was a race to advance nuclear technology. This race was primarily between the Soviet Union and the United States. There were large monetary investments from both nations into their nuclear arms programs. Everyone thought both sides would be destroyed in the end, both economically and physically. The nuclear arms race impacted civilians, economies, military, and technology in both nations.

The overwhelming majority of our citizens expect their Government to see that the tools of defense are built; and for the very purpose of preserving the democratic safeguards of both labor and management, this Government is determined to use all of its power to express the will of its people, and to prevent interference with the production of materials essential to our nation's security. (Roosevelt, Announcing an Unlimited

In Korea, the U.S. found itself unprepared to fight a conventional war having put far too much stock and time into the creation of nuclear weapons. Up to that point, two dominant views had prevailed in the U.S in regards to the future of war. One view held that the threat of a nuclear war would abolish warfare altogether through mutually assured destruction while the other reaction was that any new war would be a nuclear one and would lead to the destruction of the human race. The Korean war illustrated to Americans their previous miscalculations regarding the new face of war and also affirmed their fears of an inhuman and cruel communist enemy. It drew the Americans attention to the Soviet-Chinese-Korean effort that seemed to signal the drive

Nuclear Energy has many proponents and much opposition. Many of the groups that oppose nuclear power have legitimate concerns, mainly with the dangers of nuclear material in relation with human health concerns and environmental troubles that are risked by allowing nuclear power plants to increase in number. Yet, many of these opposition groups have made outspoken and radical claims about the “hidden” motives of why nuclear power is promoted and subsidized by our federal government. For example, The Nuclear Information and Resource Service claim that the federal government has the intention of committing genocide against Native Americans because uranium mining is predominantly done on reservations. Another cry out by nuclear

“No one in the United States has become seriously ill or has died because of any kind of accident at a civilian nuclear power plant.” says Joe Barton. This is a highly controversial topic where there are many conflicting opinions. Some people believe that these plants are too dangerous to exist while other think that they are the edge of tomorrow. When analyzing it from a purely statistical and analytical standpoint, nuclear energy is clearly worth the possible risks they pose.

“While the CDC is focusing on how our enemies could attack us, our military is focused on who may attack us, John Linder”. This means that the military job is not just to protect us, but also to prevent horrible events from happening. The only problem many people have is knowing how to balance when to use the military forces and when not to use military forces according to the historical statics. For the simple fact, that if something goes horribly wrong when the military decides to act, then, they will be hated by the same people they are trying to keep safe and if the military doesn’t act then they will also be hated by the people. The way we will determine when to use the military forces is when war happens, also when a crime is too big

Today on Earth there are all kinds of destruction that people play in today's society that could lead to a total global breakdown of are civilization. Today there are all kinds of different ways that it could happen; every country has nuclear warheads, are farmland is depleting rapidly because they are being used to house are growing population. And the Doomsday Clock says it all.

In 1970, Glenn T. Seaborg, the chairman of the United States Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), predicted that by the year 2000, more than 1000 nuclear energy reactors would be operational in the United States. However, as of 2015, only 99 nuclear power plants are currently in use. What could have led to such a dramatic difference between the expectation and reality of nuclear power? The nuclear industry has always been dependent on the public’s graces, and it seems that their opinion of atomic energy has flipped back and forth from the 1960’s to the present. Many different events and issues have influenced the public’s attitude on the issue of nuclear energy, including the Cold War, nuclear incidents such as Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima, and media portrayals such as The China Syndrome. Additionally, the safety, environmental impact, and economic feasibility of nuclear power compared to other sources of energy was a major influence. These shifts in public opinion were the primary factor in the rise and fall of nuclear energy in the United States.

While demand for energy continues to rise due the continuous need of energy in developing and developed countries and the fast decrease of natural non renewable sources of energy such as oil and gas, many countries face serious challenges regarding the security of their energy supply. As Juan Pablo Perez Alfonzo said “the oil is the evil’s excrement” therefore we can legitimately wonder what is the nuclear energy. For

America today learns from the 20th century’s experimentation in nuclear technology because of its dangerous capabilities. However, America’s fear of the destruction does not stop it from researching into safe side of nuclear energy. America has learned from the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, fear of nuclear energy, and the affliction of the Three Mile Island Accident. America today has learned from these life-changing incidents by taking political, military, and revisional actions.

In 2014, 32 658 innocent people died in five third world countries do to terrorism, 6 531 of these people died because of aiding countries missile attacks to help prevent terrorism. These developing countries have lots of conflicts within their own country and with others. When more developed countries get involved, more innocent people get killed. Once one developed country gets involved, more countries will get involved to help, so the war gets bigger, and these countries that are at war could decide to go to nuclear warfare.