Nuclear Weapons And Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Nuclear war became the biggest fear in the late 1950s. Even today it still sits in the back of people's minds. The cold wars arms race began when the soviet union had the nuclear bomb. Americans grew paranoid, so in return they

However, in the months following this Resolution, evidence to suggest Iraq’s non-compliance concerning the removal or destruction of Weapons of Mass Destruction could not be verified through the United Nations. Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei were still investigating when the United States declared war, however, prior to the declaration, they reported no evidence of non-compliance. Colin Powell’s plea to the UN to sanction the use of armed force was not obliged, in response to this in March 2003, the United States claimed diplomacy had failed, thus the only rational course of action was toppling Saddam’s regime. The United States had attempted to acquire a UN-sanctioned invasion but failed to do so. This begs the question; why did the United States use an argument that cited UNSCRs, yet themselves, fail to comply with United Nations demands?

As mentioned above, in the summer of 1945, the United States was the first to use the nuclear bomb. It showed the world the ability of the States to bring destruction. Since then, other countries (most notably Russia and China) have also produced nuclear warheads. Given history, it seems surprising that the world has not gone the way of nuclear war. However, there is an easy answer, it would have had the effect of MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction). There seems to be an acceptable rationale or thought process in this; for countries, not to use the bomb would be because one country already did, and they will know that if that country is attacked, they will unquestionably use nuclear weapons. We can see it stated in the book The Politics of Nuclear

A lot of people have been affected by the dangers and hazards of working around radioactive material. In the article, Most likely to succeed against Nuclear Weapons, it states that, “Many of these individuals suffer from exposure to materials like cesium 137, strontium 90, and tritium.” (Benedict 2) A good example of people standing up to this problem is when a US government facility at Rocky Flats, Colorado, was closed in 1989 after years of worker protests.

If a nuclear weapon is used on a city, all people and buildings would be ruined in a flash. As an example, the United States dropped

The threat of chemical weapon attack is very real; either in conventional warfare or by a lone wolf terrorist group. This fact is buttress by the facts in the reading assignments, continue efforts by some government to acquire chemical weapon technology, and open declaration by some terrorist groups of their intention to use it if they can lay their hand on it.

The United States government has a responsibility to assess and prepare for the weapons of mass destruction threat posed by terrorists. Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) is a term that individuals often use to generalize groups of distinct weapons into one main category when discussing acts of terrorism (Mauroni, 2010). A more precise way of describing WMD terrorism is by addressing the weapon by the appropriate classification, in order to understand the significance of the type of weapon.. Throughout this paper, these weapons will be classified by chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN). These weapon types have different protocols, which makes it imperative that each weapon is adequately understood in terms of probability and the potential impact (Mauroni, 2010). Generally, all weapons are low probability but they each have different impacts on society and the likelihood of each weapon being deployed by terrorists vary. According to Meulenbelt and Nieuwenhuizen (2015), "Chemical weapons seem to be relatively easily obtainable, biological

Vietnam is mindful of the dangers that Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) engender. WMD has been a persistent threat to international peace and security. Vietnam supports counter proliferation of WMD, and encourages multinational collaboration.

Weapons of Mass Destruction Weapons of Mass Destruction (1) Introduction (2) The Term * 1 Early uses of term * 1.1 Evolution of its use * 2 Definitions of the term * 2.1 United States * 2.1.1 Strategic * 2.1.2 Military * 2.1.3 Criminal (civilian) * 3 Common hazard symbols * 3.1 Radioactive weaponry/hazard symbol * 3.2 Biological weaponry/hazard symbol (3) Treaties * 1 General

Nuclear proliferation is the global spread of nuclear weapons and technology. At the end of World War II, the spread of nuclear weapons was happening at an accelerated rate. Countries like the Soviet Union, United Kingdom, France, and China were developing nuclear weapons against the wishes of the United States. In an attempt to stop proliferation, a group of scientists peacefully protested the development of nuclear weapons by sending a petition to the United Nations. The United Nation agreed that proliferation was causing political tension so decied to inact the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty in 1968. Many nation-states, including the United States and the Soviet Union, signed the treaty. This treaty has stopped the spread of nuclear weapons in a peaceful way but this treaty is becoming outdate in modern international politics. Global powers worry countries like North Korea will obtain nuclear power. Also, there is a growing concern that nuclear weapons are causing irreversible damage to the environment. The growing issue of nuclear proliferation can be evaluated through the Global Governance and Environmental lenses. Possible solutions are to allow select countries to develop their own nuclear weapons or to establish stronger legislation where the super powers prevent the spread of nuclear weapons.

Particularly, this strategy was implemented to prevent nuclear attack by these nations. Simply speaking, deterrence nearly guaranties mutual destruction through retaliation to the nations who attack with nuclear weapons and those who are attacked. The deterrence strategy allows for the creation of nuclear arms in order to maintain an arsenal enough for defense of the country. Deterrence in the United States provides safety for both the US and its allies. While this belief has a logical reason for nuclear weapon creation, the US and other countries should work to abolish this precedent to allow for a complete nuclear weapon free world.

Biochemical weapons distribute deadly toxins and microorganisms, such as viruses and bacteria, with the intent too inflict disease among humans, animals, and agriculture. Biochemical attacks could in fact result in destruction of food plots, temporarily upsetting a small community, and killing large amounts of people, or more outcomes. The way that a biochemical weapon is dispersed depends on many factors. Such as: the agent itself; the preparation; its durability; and route of infection. most agents can be spread as an aerosol, which means the agent can be inhaled or can infect a susceptible place on the skin, like a cut or wound. Attackers can also

Radioactivity has been around for as long as this earth has been in existence, and it’s not going away anytime soon. It’s been 228 long years since the discovery of Uranium, and in that time period we have learned how to enrich it, how to manipulate, and to use it for strategic purposes (Hardy 1). Of course, I’m talking about nuclear weapons. The destruction, the aftershock, and the necessity that they are to the world. These weapons of mass destruction aren’t being built in silos to collect dust, and make the world seem unsteady, they serve defined purposes. Nuclear Weapons go hand-in-hand with nuclear power, Nuclear weapons gives the United States populous a feeling of security, and Nuclear weapons have been, and are continuing to be, the number one deterrent of war. There is no denying the role that nuclear capabilities will play in the near future, and where this world goes. This is important to get right, and until we can, as a world dismiss the destructive capabilities of this power, we, as a nation, must be prepared for anything.

Fuel Enrichment is the process by which a sample of nuclear material either plutonium or uranium is brought from initial grade to weapons grade there are three common methods for enrichment of uranium isotope into weapons grade fissionable material these are gaseous diffusion, gas centrifuge, and laser separation. The first method used by the united states was gaseous diffusion which gave rise to the Plant at Oak Ridge Tennessee “ the plans for the facility were laid out in the autumn of 1942 when the army corps of engineers started buying up large tracts of land in the area the facility was one hundred square miles 1” this gives you an idea of how much space refinement of uranium at

Weapons of mass destruction, (WMD), as the name would imply are extremely powerful and very deadly. There are three types of WMDs, chemical, biological, and nuclear (Chernotsky and Hobbs 2013: 103). The difference between WMD and conventional weapons is that WMD kill a lot more and with no discrimination. Chemical weapons, such as mustard gas, are banned in war because of how inhumane it was during the world wars. Biological weapons can be just as deadly as chemical weapons if the disease is released in a highly populated area. This can cripple a country without even firing a single bullet (104). Nuclear weapons are commonly viewed as the most destructive force on the Earth. There are currently 15,000 nuclear weapons in the world with 1,800 are on high alert and can be launched at a moment’s notice (Kristensen and Norris 2017: 289). This is more than enough nuclear weapons to end the world. Nuclear weapons are very powerful and if the initial blast does not kill a person, the shockwaves, and radiation will(Nuclear Threat Initiative, “Nuclear 101”, Module 4). Most of the nuclear weapons belong to the United States and Russia, each with around 7,000. The rest of the UN security council have nuclear weapons as well, but not nearly as many. France comes the closest with 300 and China and England have around 200 each. Pakistan, India, and Israel all have nuclear weapons but they have even fewer than China and England. It is unknown how many nuclear weapons North Korea has, but