Nullification Theory Of Nullification

Clay argued that the West, which opposed the tariff, should support it since urban factory workers would be consumers of western foods. In Clay’s view, the South, which also opposed high tariffs, should be supportive because of the market for cotton in northern mills. This last argument was a tough

Therefore, it is apparent that it is the citizen’s job to secure the blessings of liberty. The citizen’s began to take action to secure their blessings of liberty prior to the Nullification Crisis, when they attempted to pass the Tariff of 1828 through Congress in hopes to aid Jackson’s re-election. Due to Jackson’s popularity, he was re-elected even without the help of the tariff. Yet the tariff was passed in 1828, and the citizen’s made a firm effort to nullify the tariff as soon as it was enacted. They believed they had the right to nullify the tariff, which sought their own privileges in liberty. The citizens further pushed for the nullification by trying to pass this though South Carolina’s legislature, but another group of citizens seeking to secure their

In 1828, Andrew Jackson passed a tariff that put a tax on foreign goods. This angered the South and they believed he was favoring the North.

Since the Civil War brought extensive economic change to the United States, civilians in the North and South faced many economic challenges. "In the North the arms, metalworkings, boot making, and shipbuilding industries boomed, but the scarcity of cotton caused widespread layoffs and closures in the textile industry" (Keene, 391). Even though workers' salaries rose by forty percent, prices increased even faster, resulting in inflation that averaged fifteen percent. Despite the North's economic hardships, the problems the South faced were far worse. "The Southern economy was hit hard by the cessation of trade with the North and Europe due to the Union blockade" (Keene, 391). Southern industry and agriculture were limited by persistent

During the late 1820s, John C. Calhoun believed that the tariff of 1816 was responsible for the decline of the South Carolina economy. Calhoun believed that if he developed the Theory of Nullification people in his home state would view him differently. The Theory of Nullification is the idea that states (unions) have the rights to void any law that is created by the government that is seen unconstitutional. States are the foundation of the Union, so they have the power to refuse any unconstitutional laws, and really states usually have the final say. What really caused the Nullification Crisis were many series of Protective Tariffs. Protective Tariffs are taxes placed on imported goods that are from foreign countries and their duty is to raise the price of foreign goods, making them less attractive to consumers protecting them from foreign competition such as; The Tariff of 1816 that placed a 20-25 percent tax on foreign goods, The Tariff of 1824 which placed a 35 percent duty on imported iron, wool, hemp, and cotton, finally the Tariff of 1828 which is also known as the Tariff of Abominations it was the third protective tariff and increased taxes to almost 50 percent.

The Nullification controversy was a tax that was placed on exports in 1828. South Carolina opposed a tax because they thought it hurt their economies. The tax then hurt the British when they bought things, such as cotton, from the southern states. South Carolina came up with the nullification, they thought any state should be able to nullify or ignore any law within its border.

State’s rights were the main interest of John C. Calhoun during the nullification crisis. He argued that states had the right to nullify a law or an act passed by the government, such as a tariff, and render it void. Through a convention held in South Carolina discord arose as the result of the convention clearly expressed that the tariff’s taxes were not to be collected within that state. Although it was Calhoun that approved the convention’s ruling, it was the majority that favored the idea of stronger state’s rights, and the ability to nullify what they viewed as unconstitutional. Consequently this resulted in a swift response from Jackson in the form of the Force Bill, allowing the use of military to enforce the acts in South

In a world where there will always be constant opposition, humanity must learn to use it as a weapon rather than a weakness. The stronger an individual or in this case a nation is, the more challenges and trials one must face. As the federal government’s power increased, the more rebellion and revolution surfaced. Many will say that the more power equaled less problems. However, that is simply untrue, because someone will always have to make a choice, like how as long as there is strength in this world, there will be a vulnerability to overcome. For example, the Whiskey Rebellion and the Nullification Crisis were determining factors of how opposition will come as long as there is power in the midst. Therefore, these two specific historical markers help show the true colors of a nation through the motives and effectiveness of federal power and constant opposition. In every abyss of darkness, there will be a light to shine through and break that barrier. History is what makes the world’s character as well the inhabitants that remain within. The Whiskey Rebellion was a way for people who appear as commoners to finally take a stand against the government, especially Alexander Hamilton’s taxes that were being put into place. Which brings the other tipping point, which is known as the Nullification Crisis, it gave the federal government a wake-up call, for it showed no matter how much power increased, there will always be a voice out there ready to be heard. And the Nullification

For example, farming was the main source of income for the Confederate states. The main southern chief crop which came to be known as King Cotton, accounted for 57% of all U.S. exports (“Civil War”). However, in order to produce these large amounts of cotton, the southern Confederate states depended heavily on slave labor. Since cotton production began to dominate and fuel the southern economy, the South felt that they did not need to industrialize like their northern neighbors did. This caused the South to manufacture very little goods and caused them to purchase manufactured goods from the industrialized North or to purchase imported goods from overseas.

Considered to be the sparkplug for the formation of the infamous Civil War, the Nullification Crisis of 1832 was a hostile conflict between the state of South Carolina and the United States government over the controversial concept of Nullification. Although the crisis concluded without a physical war or casualties, the impact of the tensions created from the Nullification Crisis would leave a lasting mark on the unsteady nation and highlight the problems rising throughout the country. Occurring during the presidency of contentious American president Andrew Jackson and his fiery vice president John C. Calhoun, this political emergency would also serve as a defining moment towards the legacies of these two American icons. This paper will seek

As time passed the rapidly changing society in the nineteenth century, in 1820 the north and south began to have serious conflicting problems that were proved unfixable by compromise. During this time, the north underwent major social, economic, and industrial changes known as the Antebellum Period. While the south generally clung to king cotton and slavery and thus remained essentially the same. This arose a manifold of controversies with how issues such as tariffs, slavery, and land should be handled. Both the Union and the Confederacy tried to create compromises to resolve these problems, yet both sides were never completely satisfied no matter how hard they tried. This made it very close to impossible for them to completely put their

Britain therefore determined American industry at this point due to its need of cotton and 'It was the behaviour of prices that decided the way southern development was to take place.'

Before the Civil War broke out in the United State the North and South had differences contributing to the tensions between the two regions in manufacturing and economics. Some of these differences included value of manufacturing and major railroads in the South and North. During 1860 the Northern states made 1,130,200,000 billion dollars more in manufacturing than the south. This difference is because during 1860 the South’s main source of income came from slavery, cotton, and tobacco. They did not have any reason to manufacture and have factories for they weren’t making much money off it.

With Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin in 1793, cotton became very profitable. This machine was able to reduce the time it took to separate seeds from the cotton. However, at the same time the increase in the number of plantations willing to move from other crops to cotton meant the greater need for a large amount of cheap labor, i.e. slaves. Thus, the southern economy became a one crop economy, depending on cotton and therefore on slavery. On the other hand, the northern economy was based more on industry than agriculture. In fact, the northern industries were purchasing the raw cotton and turning it into finished goods. This disparity between the two set up a

In 1787, the creation of the U.S. Constitution would grant the national government dominance over the states. However, the southerners still felt that they should be able determine whether or not they accepted certain acts, and the idea of nullification was proposed. John C. Calhoun was first to present the states right to nullify, or ignore federal laws in which they disagreed, in his doctrine.[6] Things seemed to have remained calm until the commencement of Lincoln’s presidency when nullification was no longer allowed.