Nurad Inc. Case Summary

In 2005, “Destiny USA”, a green-promised project of Destiny USA Holdings, considered as the borrower, was funded by three sources which are Destiny Holdings, bonds provided by the City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (SIDA), and loans (nearly $155 million) issued by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp as the lender. After that, the parties officially came into a construction loan agreement which clearly stated the roles and responsibilities of all parties in the project. Specifically, Citigroup would perform as a lender and an agent, in charge of funding money from the remaining parties ($365 million in total). After seventeen construction disbursements without any problems, the lender indicated Deficiencies under the agreement with the Tenant Improvement Costs (TI Costs) in its calculation. Subsequently, the lender started sending Deficiency notices to the borrower every month, and on May 20th, 2009, after sending an out-of-balance notice that the Deficiencies were over $15 million and getting no cure from the borrower within 10 business days, the lender stopped disbursing the remaining construction proceedings (at that time the project was almost 90% complete). Consequently, the borrower sued the lender in order to look for a preliminary injunction requesting the lender to maintain the funding for the

The plaintiff (Southern Prestige Industries, Inc.) initiated an action against the defendant (Independence Plating Corp.) in a North Carolina state court for a breach of contract. The plaintiff alleged that defects in the defendant’s anodizing process caused the plaintiff’s machine parts to be rejected by Kidde Aerospace. The defendant being a New Jersey corporation and having its only office and all of its personnel situated in the state filed a motion to dismiss citing lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motion and the defendant appealed arguing that there were insufficient contacts to satisfy the due process of law requirements

The issue is whether the appelles, Avanell Looney and Rita Alexander, had acted for or on behalf of J&R Construction at the time of signing the contract.

UCM: CPSW received a phone call from Ms. Bensalih. CPSW scheduled office visit for Ms. Bensalih on 11/10/16 12pm at Brookdale office. CPSW asked about the phone calls and Ms. Bensalih not calling back. CPSW mentioned to Ms. Bensalih that this writer called to schedule office visit and Ms. Bensalih has not been sucussfull returning phone calls to her CPSW. CPSW mentioned to Ms. Bensalih that this writer is concerned about Ms. Bensalih not responding and following through with the department's recommendation. CPSW asked Ms. Bensalih to complete her UA's consistency and her color code is red. Ms. Bensalih stated that she did not complete any UA's at this time and that she will start doing UA's very soon. Also, Ms. Bensalih reported that she has done a random UA's at Tubman Chrysalis.

Question Presented is to provide an advice to the client (Sam) on inclusion of the most favorable provisions of corporate documents provision under the following facts:

Neser aptly observes that the persuasive value of Griffin’s testimony regarding the intent of the HCGPP is discounted by the fact Griffin articulated his statements regarding the section’s intent after this question into the nuances of this provision arose. Indeed, the persuasive value of Griffin’s testimony is discounted to the extent that it might constitute an ad hoc iteration of the agency’s subsequently articulated intent. Griffin’s testimony regarding the intent of this provision is nevertheless consistent with the subsequent amendment made to adopt the Board’s interpretation of the statute. “While amendments are not controlling as to the meaning of prior iteration of the same statutory scheme, ‘nevertheless, subsequent legislation

The Phillips then filed a lawsuit against the Higginses, the Hargroves, the Fitzgeralds, HFE, and AJ in the Circuit Court for Talbot County, entitled Phillips v. Hargrove Family Enterprises, LLC, et al., Case No. 20-C-12-7991 (the “Previous Litigation”). After several months of litigation and discovery, the Phillips, the Higginses, and the Hargroves negotiated a settlement in late March 2013. The Phillips, the Higginses, and the Hargroves entered into written settlement agreements (the “Settlement Agreements”). The Higginses and the Hargroves also entered into Membership Interest Purchase Agreements with the Phillipses and the Phillipses’ new business partner, Defendant Edward Mikowski (“Mikowski”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreements, the parties released their claims against one another, and the membership interests in Easton Golf and Riverhouse held by HFE and AJ were sold to the Phillipses and Mikowski. After the settlement between the Phillipses, the Higginses, and the Hargroves, the Previous Litigation continued between the Phillipses and the

CCIB received a SOC 341 via email stating that facility staff reported to RP, patient Effie had no injury as of 0400 hours (4 AM). RP reported Effie was found after fall with urine soaked clothes and large bruising. In addition, the report states that Effie also had dried blood/scars in the head and a large bruise on left elbow all which were not from 10 min prior. RP reported that staff from the home stated that Effie fell on 5/2/2017 and that they called the paramedics (no detail). RP reported that Effie disclosed to RP in private that she fell the day before (5/1/2017). RP reported that Effie was taken to Kiser in Santa Rosa to receive medical attention on 5/2/2017.

(4th Amend. Compl. ¶¶ 45.) According to her allegations, Nenn “definitively learned” that her medical issues were connected to the mold exposure at the property. (4th Amend. Compl. ¶ 53.) Thereafter, Nenn allegedly hired mold testing experts to inspect the property, who allegedly “confirmed” the dangerously high mold levels. (4th Amend. Compl. ¶¶ 49-50.) Plaintiffs also allege that the Village of Algonquin inspected the property and, “upon information and belief,” confirmed that the property was in disrepair and had dangerously high mold levels; however, Plaintiffs have not attached any documentation to support that allegation. (4th Amend. Compl. ¶¶ 69-70.) Plaintiffs allege that they were unable to return to the property after their diagnoses and the September 2014 inspection. (4th Amend. Compl. ¶ 74.) Plaintiffs vacated the premises on October 3, 2014, 41 days after first notifying Defendants of the alleged toxic mold. (4th Amend. Compl. ¶

On Friday May 29, 2015 I talked to Diversion Investigator (DI) Frank Ringenbach, DEA case agent, via telephone and he explained DEA’s investigation of Dr. Ishida.

A judge in Upstate New York dodged the boot after he was charged of more than two instances of judicial misconduct. A counsel for the state Commission on Judicial conduct recommended Hastings Town Justice Michael R. Clark to be removed from the bench two years ago. Last week its 11-member panel unanimously ruled to punish the judge for a variety of misconduct in 2010 and 2011.The commission ruled Clark dismissed or reduced certain charges without giving information to the prosecution, did not provide a defendant with the opportunity to speak on bail. Clark also forced conditions of release with no legal basis and made inappropriate comments about the defendant’s appearance.

In 2012, a marine project manager called Bellingham Marine Inc. (“Bellingham”) hired Major Engineering Marine Inc. (“Major”) for a project to build a travel lift pier at a harbor. Bellingham then hired a civil engineering firm, Moffatt & Nichol

have a legally binding contract to sell the warehouses in six months to a third

RoboCorp designs and manufactures robots for industrial purposes; most recent developments have been pick and place material handling robots and robotic welding arms which are being used by huge corporations for various purposes. Montex Industries are one of the most valuable customers accounting for a major share of revenue for RoboCorp. The pick and place material handling robots are used extensively in their power plants and they now require robotic arms with optical scanners to automate the inspection of the parts inside the nuclear plants. Though there is a lot of research and development at RoboCorp, there is not enough expertize to design and manufacture optical sensors which could be used with robotic arms, especially considering the

Pharmed First Inc. is a widely successful chain pharmaceutical company with 85 drugstores located in Canada’s Atlantic provinces. George Brenner is one of the 6 regional managers and Angela MacFee is a store manager in a mall located in Dartmouth. One of MacFee’s loyal customers have purchased 9 packages of Diet Magic on September 2011 however wanted to return them on May 2012. Subsequently, MacFee reacted hastily and defensively, arguing with Johnston in spite of Pharmed First Inc. return policy (Figure 1). As a result, Johnston wrote a letter to Frank Chen, the president of Pharmed First Inc. and told Brenner to deal with it. He proposed that the company gives Johnston a $500 voucher and that MacFee apologizes. However, MacFee remained inflexible as she also challenged Brenner’s authority.