Nursing Case Study Alarm Management

The National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG) program was created in 2002 by the Joint Commission to help organizations identify and address issues with patient safety. The people who determine what the safety goals are and how they should be addressed is called the Patient Safety Advisory Group. This group is composed of medical professionals who have “hands-on experience in addressing patient safety issues in a wide variety of health care settings.”(The Joint Commission, 2015) The first group of goals set by the advisory group were published Jan. 1, 2003. Currently, there are 6 hospital patient safety goals:

The Joint Commission focuses on certain goals each year. For patient safety and positive outcomes, hospitals are required to follow certain standards. National Patient Safety Goals were established in 2002 to help identify areas of concern with patient safety. This group is made up by a panel of experts including nurses, doctors, pharmacists and many other healthcare professionals. They advise the Joint Commission on how to address these different patient safety issues. Two goals to be discussed are improving the accuracy of patient identification and medication safety. To improve patient

"To continuously improve health care for the public, in collaboration with other stakeholders, by evaluating health care organizations and inspiring them to excel in providing safe and effective care of the highest quality and value” (Jointcommission.org, 2015). These requirements are regimented in the National Patient Safety Goals and are enforced via surveys and internal inspections to ensure that healthcare institutions abide by the safety mechanisms put in place to facilitate the optimal patient outcomes and environments.

The process is an action plan that tends to illuminate on the strategies to be employed with the purpose of reducing the risk of a similar sentinel event such as that of Mr. B’s scenario. It addresses the responsibility for the oversight, implementation, pilot testing, as well as timelines and strategies for the measurement of actions that are effective (Lewis et al, 2014). All the root cause analysis (RCA) findings conducted above should help in the determination of the appropriate action plan. The appropriate improvement plan in this scenario should encompass the reevaluation of the events that led up to the code blue of Mr. B. The plan should look at the staffing mix, if the licensed personnel are trained appropriately, the patient to nurse ratio in the ER and the types of patients that were in the ER at the time. When

The following are the National Patient Safety Goals for 2016: improve the accuracy of patient identification, improve the effectiveness of communication of caregivers, improve the safety of using medications, reduce the harm associated with clinical alarm systems, reduce the risk of health care- associated infections, and for the hospital to identify safety risks inherent in its patient population (Hudson 2016 page 2). Under each category there are specific goals, such

Keeping patients safe is essential in today’s health care system, but patient safety events that violate that safety are increasing each year. It was only recently, that the focus on patient safety was reinforced by a report prepared by Institute of medicine (IOM) entitled ” To err is human, building a safer health system”(Wakefield & Iliffe,2002).This report found that approx-imately 44,000 to 98,000 deaths occur each year due to medical errors and that the majority was preventable. Deaths due to medical errors exceed deaths due to many other causes such as like HIV infections, breast cancer and even traffic accidents (Wakefield & Iliffe, 2002). After this IOM reports, President Clinton established quality interagency

healthcare organization accrediting bodies, and to maintain credibility with patients and peers alike, must adhere to the National Patient Safety Goals. As stated by Ulrich and Kear (2014), "Not only are nurses responsible for providing safe patient care, we are also responsible for creating an environment in which others can provide safe patient care, and for being the last line of defense when needed between the patient and potential harm. Having a deep understanding of patient safety and patient safety culture allows nurses to be the leaders we need to be in ensuring that our patients are always

The Joint Commission has instituted a number of goals nationally; the aim is to improve patient’s safety. The goals selected look at areas that are of concern in the healthcare industry particularly how it affect patients safety and make recommendations how to reduce if not eradicated these. The Joint Commission is the governing body that accredited hospitals and other health care organizations. The two hospitals that this paper will be comparing, using the goals and criteria recommended by the Joint commission, is Holy Cross Hospital located at 1500 Forest Glen Road, Silver Spring, MD and Shady Grove Hospital situated at, 9901 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD.

Human interaction between individuals and systems does not occur in a vacuum, rather it occurs in a dynamic and multidimensional setting. From a structural and procedural system performance perspective, the nursing care environment “is perfectly designed to get the results it gets” (LLoyd, Murray, & Provost, 2015). When mistakes happen in healthcare, all Joint Commission accredited healthcare organizations are obligated to analyze the care environment to assess for opportunities to improve the structural and procedural elements that lead to care failures, as in the fictitious sentinel event case of Mr. B who presented to the emergency department for a

Alarm fatigue in health care has grown to be an ever-growing concern in the health care arena, especially when looking at patient safety concerns. There must be an understanding of the problem before we can develop policies and effective strategies to counter this problem. The concept of alarm fatigue in health care will be evaluated utilizing the method developed by Walker and Avant (2010) that identifies and gives the significance of the attributes, antecedents, and end-consequences of alarm fatigue in health care. This will be developed based

As the Joint Commission aims to nationally improve health care systems through health care organizations collaborations, it publishes recommended patient safety goals. As stated by the Joint Commission, “the first obligation of health care is to “do no harm””. The Joint Commission’s 2015 National Patient Safety Goals for hospitals include : Identify patients correctly; Improve staff communication; Use

Goal 6: Know Your Alarms. Alarms familiarity on your unit is integral to the best patient safety. Take faulty

Back in 2003, the Joint Commission created a National Patient Safety Goal due to 23 occurrences of death or injury to a patient where alarms had been applied incorrectly or the alarms had been muted (Sendelbach & Funk, 2013). By 2004, Joint Commission had removed it from their National Patient Safety Goal list and made it a requirement for Joint Commission accreditations (Sendelbach & Funk, 2013). In 2013, it was brought to the attention of the Joint Commission regarding many alarm-related events, including multiple deaths, permanent loss of function, and prolonged hospital stays due to health care worker’s decreased response times to alarms (Horkan, 2014; Joint Commission, 2013). The Joint Commission reinstated a National Patient Safety Goal in 2013 and had requirements for all hospitals that had to be met by July 1, 2014 (Joint Commission, 2013). These goals included being able to make alarm safety a priority and develop a plan to decrease the amount of alarms. This plan could include preventing unnecessary patient monitoring, clarifying who is allowed to monitor and silence alarms, setting the cardiac monitors to have multiple tones, and having a brief delay in the alarm to see if the patient can self-resolve. The second phase of the Joint Commission’s plan was to be implemented by January 2016, to where the hospital must have followed through with their designated plan (Joint Commission, 2013).

Clinical alarm systems in acute and critical care health care settings are an assistive way to maintain communication between the client and the nurse. Awareness and comprehension of health devices is crucial to provide nurses with appropriate strategies for critical or non critical interventions that can lead to sentinel events. The ECRI, a nonprofit institute, has identified alarm hazards as the “Top Ten Health Technology Hazards” for 2014. (cite) In 2013 The Joint Commission published a Sentinel Event Alert proposing a National Safety Goal to focus on alarm safety (cite). This topic is pertinent information to be recognized and set as an achievable action in improving patient safety.

The alarms on clinical devices have the intended purpose of calling the caregiver’s attention to patient or device situations that require the caregiver to intervene. This intervention may be with respect to the patient’s condition, or to correct some aspect of the operation of the medical device. An example of a patient issue is low heart rate while an example of an equipment issue is a leads-off alarm. Alarm situations may be urgent in that the patient’s well being would be compromised if there were not a quick response. In other situations there may be little or no urgency, although the situation still requires attention. An unfortunate aspect of most clinical alarms is that the sounds that they make do not usually distinguish urgent situations